<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bramble: High Court of Australia</title>
    <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/high-court-of-australia</link>
    <description>Stories involving High Court of Australia, told neutrally, with how each side covers them.</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <atom:link href="https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/high-court-of-australia/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court of Australia rules planners must weigh climate harm in Mount Pleasant coal mine case</title>
      <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/australia-s-high-court-rules-for-community-group-in-hunter-valley-coal</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/australia-s-high-court-rules-for-community-group-in-hunter-valley-coal</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 04:11:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Climate</category>
      <description>Three of five High Court judges sided with a Hunter Valley residents' group, finding planning approval for the Mount Pleasant coal mine expansion had to account for climate effects. Mach Energy said it was disappointed but accepts the decision. (2 outlets: 2 left · 0 centre · 0 right)</description>
      <media:content url="https://live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au/75912ca2129d11b23d106a98b10d270f?impolicy=wcms_watermark_news&amp;cropH=1628&amp;cropW=2895&amp;xPos=0&amp;yPos=151&amp;width=862&amp;height=485&amp;imformat=generic" medium="image"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
