<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bramble: Nutritional value of crops</title>
    <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/nutritional-value-of-crops</link>
    <description>Stories involving Nutritional value of crops, told neutrally, with how each side covers them.</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <atom:link href="https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/nutritional-value-of-crops/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Study claims UK and other crops have lost 20–50% of some nutrients since the 1960s</title>
      <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/research-suggests-uk-crops-far-less-nutritious-than-in-the-1960s</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/research-suggests-uk-crops-far-less-nutritious-than-in-the-1960s</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:12:06 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>Science</category>
      <description>A report by the UK firm Deep Science Ventures says many common crops now hold 20–50% less of key minerals than in the 1960s, which it links to soil decline. The Daily Mail notes that not all scientists agree on the scale of the problem. (2 outlets: 0 left · 0 centre · 2 right)</description>
      <media:content url="https://i.dailymail.com/1s/2026/10/07/10/111700533-0-image-a-9_1791365920011.jpg" medium="image"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
