<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bramble: Presidential Records Act</title>
    <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/presidential-records-act</link>
    <description>Stories involving Presidential Records Act, told neutrally, with how each side covers them.</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <atom:link href="https://news.ketelle.co.uk/entities/presidential-records-act/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals panel skeptical of DOJ claim that Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional</title>
      <link>https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/appeals-panel-doubts-doj-argument-that-presidential-records-act-is-unc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://news.ketelle.co.uk/stories/appeals-panel-doubts-doj-argument-that-presidential-records-act-is-unc</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:30:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <category>US</category>
      <description>At a Friday D.C. Circuit hearing, judges appeared doubtful of the Justice Department's argument that the 1978 Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. Coverage differs in emphasis on the judges' remarks and on Trump's Mar-a-Lago history. (2 outlets: 1 left · 0 centre · 1 right)</description>
      <media:content url="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/AP26285774387521.jpg?resize=1200,683" medium="image"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
