Skip to content
Bramble

US

Air Force orders $694m production of AGM-183A hypersonic missile from Lockheed Martin

The Department of the Air Force announced a $694 million contract with Lockheed Martin to produce the AGM-183A ARRW hypersonic missile, three years after it moved to end the programme. Coverage differs on whether to stress the programme's reversal or the global hypersonic race.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: Newsweek

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 1The Department of the Air Force announced on Monday a $694 million contract with Lockheed Martin for production of the AGM-183A Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW), the Air Force's first hypersonic missile. Right · 1According to the Washington Examiner, an Air Force press release said the contract was signed on Sept. 29 but only revealed Monday, and it was awarded under the Enterprise-Wide Agile Acquisition Contract. Mixed · 2Air Force Secretary Troy Meink called the move "a turning point in our advanced weapons roadmap" that gives combatant commanders a "credible, high-speed strike weapon", while Chief of Staff Gen. Ken Wilsbach described "a flexible and rapid response option for highly contested environments".

Centre · 1Newsweek reports the contract is part of the "Arsenal of Freedom" unveiled by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a Pentagon push to produce more weapons. Mixed · 2The programme had nearly ended: in March 2023, after several failed tests, the Air Force's acquisition executive Andrew Hunter told the House Armed Services Committee it did not intend to pursue follow-on procurement of ARRW, favouring the RTX and Northrop Grumman Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM). Mixed · 2The Washington Examiner says the HACM stalled while ARRW testing succeeded in 2024, and that the Air Force's fiscal 2027 budget request included $296 million to begin ARRW Increment 2 technology efforts; Newsweek says the HACM was flight tested in Australia earlier this month.

Mixed · 2The ARRW is launched from a B-2 or B-52 bomber, carried to the upper atmosphere by a rocket booster, then glides to its target at more than Mach 5 on a shallower trajectory than a ballistic missile and can manoeuvre, making interception harder. Right · 1The Washington Examiner says the weapon has been touted for its ship-killing ability against China in a possible Pacific conflict. Centre · 1Newsweek places the order in a wider context: it says the US lagged Russia and China after de-prioritising hypersonics following early-2000s investment, that the US has no operational hypersonic weapons, and that the GAO estimates hypersonic missiles will cost nearly $70 million each versus about $4 million for a Patriot interceptor or Tomahawk.

Centre · 1Newsweek adds that the Trump administration wants military spending of $1.5 trillion, with around $38 billion for hypersonic programmes according to congressional research, and quotes Council on Geostrategy fellow William Freer saying the revival suggests final test data was positive and priorities or budgets have shifted.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Uses the contract as a hook for an explainer on how US hypersonic efforts compare with Russia and China.
Emphasis
Russian and Chinese systems, other US programmes, cost per missile, and the defence budget.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the contract's signing date and contracting vehicle, the fiscal 2027 ARRW Increment 2 request, and the Pacific/ship-killing role.
Charged language
“Arsenal of Freedom”“pump out”
For example
“to pump out a previously-shelved hypersonic weapon” — Newsweek
“Western countries have trailed behind Russia and China in developing hypersonic weapons” — Newsweek

Right1 outlet

Framing
Frames the order as a reversal and a 'triumph for Lockheed Martin' after the programme nearly ended, with emphasis on its role against China in the Pacific.
Emphasis
Contract details, programme history, budget request, and how the weapon works.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives little on cost per missile, comparison with Russian and Chinese programmes, or other US hypersonic efforts.
Charged language
“triumph for Lockheed Martin”“leapfrogged”
For example
“marks a triumph for Lockheed Martin” — Washington Examiner
“the ARRW soon leapfrogged over it” — Washington Examiner

Ask about this story

Loading…