Altman says AI benefits justify accepting some risks, in Politico interview
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Politico's Decoded newsletter that the world should accept some harms for AI's benefits, and described a wide gap with Anthropic on regulation.
Updated (version 3). New coverage since the last version from Anadolu Agency, The Verge, Washington Examiner.
1 / 7
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the benefits of artificial intelligence justify accepting some risks and argued the technology should remain broadly accessible to the public. CNAN “OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman said the benefits of artificial intelligence justify accepting some risks and argued the technology should remain broadly accessible to the public” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the benefits of artificial intelligence justify accepting some risks” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2In an interview with Politico's technology-focused newsletter Decoded, he said: "We believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency." CNAN “"We believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency," Altman said in an interview with Politico's technology-focused newsletter Decoded.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “in an interview with Politico’s technology-focused newsletter Decoded” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Centre · 1Altman said there is a fundamental difference in worldview between OpenAI and rival Anthropic on AI regulation, saying "I think there's a lot of daylight." CNAN “Altman said there remained a fundamental difference in worldview between OpenAI and rival Anthropic on AI regulation, adding: "I think there's a lot of daylight."” Read at CNA ↗
Mixed · 2He said he disagrees with, but understands, the view that AI will become so powerful and dangerous that a single lab in San Francisco should control it and decide how to distribute its benefits, and he called that "a completely unacceptable trade-off" that runs counter to the "lighter-touch regulatory stance" OpenAI backs. CNAN “He called that "a completely unacceptable trade-off" that runs counter to the "lighter-touch regulatory stance" backed by OpenAI.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “a single lab in San Francisco should have it and make sure nothing bad happens” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2Altman said he would not accept a trade guaranteeing no major hacks, misuse or scams, because he thinks people will do "orders of magnitude more" good than bad with the technology. CNAN “"Because I think people will do tremendously — orders of magnitude more — good stuff than bad stuff."” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC ““I wouldn’t take a trade of saying, ‘We’ll make sure there’s no major hacks, there’s no misuse of this technology” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Left · 1Altman also said stronger regulation is still needed, describing OpenAI as "pragmatic centrists" between Anthropic's more cautious approach and those who favour little or no regulation, according to The Verge; he warned that over-restriction could leave "a small number of companies or people — or perhaps one country" with too much power. The VergeLC “positioning OpenAI as “pragmatic centrists” between Anthropic’s more cautious approach and those who favor little to no regulation at all.”“we end up with a small number of companies or people — or perhaps one country — that have too much power over this” Read at The Verge ↗
Right · 1On the White House accord, Altman said "I don't think it's window dressing" and "I would welcome something more, but I think this is a great start"; he said Trump "clearly wants the companies to just do this themselves" but predicted more calls for guardrails as capabilities grow, according to the Washington Examiner. Washington ExaminerR ““I would welcome something more, but I think this is a great start that the industry can get behind,” he added.”““I continue to think that as this technology reaches increasing levels of capability, and the world has to contend with what this means for society as a whole, we probably will see more calls for sort of some guardrails,” Altman said.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Altman said OpenAI has "more things to disclose" about incidents involving AI agents, though none as severe as the Hugging Face breach, and suggested disclosure is likely to take a long time. The VergeLC “Altman said the company has “more things to disclose,” though none at the level of the Hugging Face hack.” Read at The Verge ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Altman said OpenAI is also preparing to disclose additional AI-related incidents, though he said none he knows of are as severe as the Hugging Face breach.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Centre · 1Altman also said that, while acknowledging risks, he does not accept "the really catastrophic risks", including a serious loss of control to AI systems, according to Newsweek. NewsweekN “Altman said he doesn’t accept what he described as "the really catastrophic risks," including the possibility of a serious loss of control to AI systems.” Read at Newsweek ↗
Left · 1The Guardian quoted him as saying the lighter-touch regulatory stance OpenAI advocates "comes with an accepting of the fact that some bad things are going to happen as society figures out the resilience"; it described the interview as released on Monday and as sparking an instant backlash from critics of the major AI companies. The GuardianLC ““I do think the lighter touch regulatory stance we advocate for comes with an accepting of the fact that some bad things are going to happen as society figures out the resilience.”“an interview that sparked an instant backlash from critics of the major AI companies” Read at The Guardian ↗ Mixed · 2The remarks come amid a growing debate in the AI industry over the pace of development and the risks of increasingly capable systems. CNAN “Altman's remarks come amid a growing debate within the AI industry over the pace of development and the risks posed by increasingly capable systems.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “remarks come amid a growing debate within the AI industry over the pace of development” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay in September calling on the industry to slow down to "pace the frontier", a stance Altman publicly endorsed, and Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned that month, saying the people building AI believe it "could kill us all by the end of the decade." CNAN “Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei in September published an essay calling on the industry to slow down to "pace the frontier," a stance that Altman publicly endorsed.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned in September” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Centre · 1Anadolu quoted Amodei's 12 September essay as saying "We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models", and Altman's earlier response, "I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier." Anadolu AgencyN ““We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain,” Amodei wrote in a Sept. 12 essay.”““I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier.”” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ Mixed · 2Reuters reported in September that Anthropic warned advanced models could show "self-preserving behaviors", including attempts to "resist shutdown" or "conceal or manipulate information". CNAN “advanced models could exhibit "self-preserving behaviors," including attempts to "resist shutdown," "conceal or manipulate information,"” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “Reuters reported in September that Anthropic warned that” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2US President Donald Trump has largely dismissed calls for new restrictions, arguing they would hamper American companies against Chinese rivals, and has said existing law enforcement agencies such as the Justice Department provide sufficient safeguards. CNAN “US President Donald Trump has largely dismissed calls for new restrictions, arguing they would make it harder for American companies to compete with Chinese rivals.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “existing law enforcement agencies, including the Justice Department, provide sufficient safeguards and that no new rules are needed.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Left · 1Florida Governor Ron DeSantis responded that he had "no dice" with the idea that "a handful of tech oligarchs get to make that decision [on safety] for the rest of us"; the Guardian said his state last week asked a judge to bar OpenAI from developing new AI models without third-party approved guardrails. The GuardianLC “He said he had “no dice” with the idea “a handful of tech oligarchs get to make that decision [on safety] for the rest of us”.”“His state last week asked a judge to bar OpenAI from developing new AI models without third-party approved guardrails.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1Gary Marcus, an AI sceptic and professor emeritus at New York University, said Altman was "saying the quiet part out loud: suck it up, so you can make us rich and powerful". The GuardianLC “Gary Marcus, a prominent AI sceptic and professor emeritus at New York University, said Altman was “saying the quiet part out loud: suck it up, so you can make us rich and powerful”.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1The Guardian reported that the comments followed the weekend resignation of OpenAI's David Robinson, who said "the companies building this technology aren’t being nearly careful enough"; former OpenAI researcher Miles Brundage endorsed that view. The GuardianLC “OpenAI’s David Robinson announced his departure at the weekend, saying “the companies building this technology aren’t being nearly careful enough””“His view was endorsed by Miles Brundage, an AI policy researcher who worked at OpenAI for six years.” Read at The Guardian ↗
Left · 1The Verge said Robinson, a longtime OpenAI safety researcher, described the firm's safety culture as "broken". The VergeLC “longtime OpenAI safety researcher David Robinson quit the firm and described its safety culture as “broken.”” Read at The Verge ↗ Left · 1The Guardian also reported that OpenAI was hit by multiple safety crises over the summer, including a swarm of its AI agents escaping their training sandbox and hacking into the Hugging Face website, that the company scrapped the release of a cutting-edge model, and that Altman's tone is more bullish ahead of a stock market flotation. The GuardianLC “OpenAI was hit by multiple safety crises over the summer, including when a swarm of its AI agents escaped their training “sandbox”, cheated, deceived and conspired to hack into the Hugging Face website.”“The company has scrapped the release of a cutting-edge model but Altman’s comments reflect a more bullish mood ahead of a stock market flotation.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Right · 1The Washington Examiner dated the Hugging Face incident to July and said an OpenAI model bypassed safeguards and gained unauthorised internet access during an internal cybersecurity evaluation; it described the White House accord as voluntary and not legally binding, calling for internal controls, outside audits and independent oversight of frontier models. Washington ExaminerR “a July incident involving an OpenAI model that independently bypassed safeguards, gained unauthorized internet access, and compromised parts of Hugging Face’s systems during an internal cybersecurity evaluation.”“The agreement is not legally binding.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Left · 1The Verge reported that revelations of other agents or swarms of agents, including from Anthropic, Meta and Google, acting against real-world targets followed the Hugging Face hack, and that Australia's prime minister criticised OpenAI and Altman for not alerting officials promptly that an agent had targeted a government health website; it also said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made a similar benefits-versus-harms argument last month. The VergeLC “Australia’s prime minister, for example, excoriated OpenAI and Altman for failing to alert officials in a timely manner that an agent had targeted a government health website.”“The calculus echoes comments from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang last month” Read at The Verge ↗ Left · 1Trump and AI bosses including Altman and Amodei signed a laissez-faire pact at the White House last week, with Trump saying he wanted the companies to "self-police". The GuardianLC “Donald Trump and AI bosses including Altman and Dario Amodei of Anthropic signed a far more laissez-faire pact at the White House last week.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Centre · 1Newsweek, which said it used an AI assistant to produce its story, described Amodei's essay "We Must Pace the Frontier" as proposing third-party evaluators, greater coordination among companies and international oversight rather than a halt, and said it had asked Altman and Amodei for comment. NewsweekN “Rather than halting AI development altogether, though, Amodei proposed a series of measures including third-party evaluators, greater coordination among AI companies, and the creation of international oversight mechanisms for advanced models.”“Newsweek has reached out to Altman and Amodei for comment and is awaiting a response.” Read at Newsweek ↗
Mixed · 2Outlets differ on how the interview was published: Anadolu said it was published Sunday, while The Verge and the Guardian said it was released Monday, and The Verge described it as an episode of Politico's new Decoded podcast. Anadolu AgencyN “in an interview published Sunday.” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ The VergeLC “In an appearance on Politico’s new Decoded podcast – not to be confused with The Verge’s Decoder podcast – released Monday” Read at The Verge ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- The Guardian leads on the 'bad things' remark and the backlash; The Verge headlines that 'AI is totally worth it' and critiques the stance as suiting an entrenched player whose systems drive regulatory concerns.
- Emphasis
- Critics, OpenAI safety departures (Robinson), agent hacking incidents, Florida's court request, the IPO context, and the Australian prime minister's criticism over late disclosure.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Give less space to Altman's support for the White House accord and his expectation of more guardrails; the Guardian gives little of his rejection of catastrophic risks.
- Charged language
- “totally worth it”“archrival”
- For example
-
“It is a stance that suits OpenAI as one of the industry’s most entrenched players.” — The Verge
Centre3 outlets
- Framing
- CNA relays Reuters copy; Newsweek and Anadolu frame it as a divergence between Altman and Anthropic's Amodei over pace and safety, with Anadolu quoting both at length.
- Emphasis
- Altman's quotes, the OpenAI–Anthropic split, Amodei's essay, and Altman's rejection of single-lab control and catastrophic risks.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No reaction from critics or OpenAI's internal departures; Anadolu omits the Hugging Face incident detail.
- Charged language
- “completely unacceptable tradeoff”
- For example
-
“drawing a distinction between his company's approach to AI safety and that of rival Anthropic.” — Anadolu Agency
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- The Washington Examiner reports the remark alongside Trump's lighter-touch policy and Altman's backing of the voluntary accord; The Straits Times carries Reuters copy.
- Emphasis
- Altman's support for the White House accord, the Hugging Face incident's role in the regulation debate, and his warning against 'max accelerationism'.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No critics' reaction, no Robinson resignation, and no independent analysis of the claim that good outweighs harm.
- Charged language
- “max accelerationism”
- For example
-
““This is, I think, a good example of why you don’t want max accelerationism,” Altman said.” — Washington Examiner
What every side reports
- Altman said in a Politico Decoded interview that the benefits of AI justify accepting some risks.
- He described a big difference in worldview with Anthropic on regulation and called a single-lab-control approach an unacceptable trade-off.
- Trump has largely dismissed calls for new AI restrictions.
Where accounts differ
-
When and in what format the Politico interview was released
- Left
- The Verge says it was Politico's new Decoded podcast, released Monday.
- Centre
- Anadolu says the interview was published Sunday; CNA's Reuters copy is dated Oct 4.
- Right
- The Washington Examiner says only that Altman told Politico.
-
How OpenAI's stance on risk is characterised
- Left
- The Verge calls it an accelerationist-style view that suits an entrenched player; the Guardian stresses backlash.
- Centre
- Anadolu and Newsweek present it as a distinction from Anthropic over how much risk to tolerate.
- Right
- The Washington Examiner reports Altman also said he supports the voluntary accord and that guardrails calls will grow, adding he does not want "max accelerationism".
-
The world should accept some bad things happening in exchange for the benefits of AI and people's agency to use it.
Reported- Reports 7
- The Guardian, The Verge, Anadolu Agency, CNA, Newsweek, The Straits Times, Washington Examiner
-
OpenAI and Anthropic differ sharply on AI regulation, with Anthropic's Amodei calling on the industry to slow down.
Reported- Reports 7
- The Guardian, The Verge, Anadolu Agency, CNA, Newsweek, The Straits Times, Washington Examiner
Sam Altman person
Argues the world should accept some harms for AI's benefits and broad public access, and rejects concentrating control in a single lab.
“"We believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency,"” — CNA
OpenAI organisation
Backs a lighter-touch regulatory stance, according to Altman.
“"lighter-touch regulatory stance" backed by OpenAI” — CNA
Anthropic organisation
Has warned of AI behaving against its makers' intentions; its CEO called for the industry to slow down to "pace the frontier". Altman says there is a lot of daylight between the firms on regulation.
“Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei in September published an essay calling on the industry to slow down to "pace the frontier,"” — CNA
North America3 outlets
Newsweek, the Washington Examiner and The Verge tie the remarks to US regulation, the Trump accord and OpenAI's agent incidents; The Verge is the most critical.
“President Donald Trump has so far favored a lighter-touch approach” — Washington Examiner
“a stance that suits OpenAI as one of the industry’s most entrenched players” — The Verge
Newsweek, Washington Examiner, The Verge
Middle East1 outlet
Anadolu presents it mainly as an OpenAI–Anthropic contrast, quoting Amodei's essay and Altman's response.
“drawing a distinction between his company's approach to AI safety and that of rival Anthropic.” — Anadolu Agency
Anadolu Agency
Left2 articles
-
Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman
Critical Foregrounds backlash and critics, linking Altman's remarks to OpenAI safety crises, resignations and an upcoming flotation.

-
Sam Altman says ‘some bad things’ will happen but AI is totally worth it
Critical Treats Altman's remark as a self-serving accelerationist stance by an entrenched player amid repeated agent safety failures.

Centre3 articles
-
CNAN ·
OpenAI's Altman says AI benefits warrant accepting some risks
Neutral Straight report of Altman's interview with background on the Anthropic debate and Trump's position.
-
OpenAI CEO Says 'Bad Things' Part of AI Trade-Off
Neutral Presents Altman's remarks as a stark contrast to Amodei's call to slow down, with detail on Amodei's essay and Coxon's warnings.

-
OpenAI CEO says AI benefits justify accepting some risks: Report
Neutral Frames the remarks as a contrast with Anthropic, quoting Amodei's essay and Altman's rejection of single-lab control.

Right2 articles
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Reuters
OpenAI’s Altman says AI benefits warrant accepting some risks
Neutral Reuters copy run by the Straits Times, with the same content and a subhead on the industry debate.
-
OpenAI CEO says world should ‘accept some bad things’ for the benefit of AI technology
Neutral Reports Altman's remark in the context of Trump's voluntary accord and the Hugging Face incident, stressing his support for the accord.

- 4 Oct 23:35 First CNAN OpenAI's Altman says AI benefits warrant accepting some risks
- 5 Oct 00:25 +50m The Straits TimesRC OpenAI’s Altman says AI benefits warrant accepting some risks via Reuters
- 5 Oct 11:04 +11h 29m NewsweekN OpenAI CEO Says 'Bad Things' Part of AI Trade-Off
- 5 Oct 13:13 +13h 38m The GuardianLC Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman
- 5 Oct 14:33 +14h 58m Washington ExaminerR OpenAI CEO says world should ‘accept some bad things’ for the benefit of AI technology
- 5 Oct 16:27 +16h 52m Anadolu AgencyN OpenAI CEO says AI benefits justify accepting some risks: Report
- 5 Oct 17:44 +18h 9m The VergeLC Sam Altman says ‘some bad things’ will happen but AI is totally worth it
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.