Skip to content
Bramble

Culture

Toronto art workers' group plans Oct. 22 Wikipedia edit-a-thon on Palestinian artists

An anti-Zionist Canadian art workers' group is holding a Wikipedia editing event in Toronto on Oct. 22 to add entries on Palestinian artists. Two right-leaning outlets report it and cite Wikipedia's neutrality policy.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: National Post
Image: The Jerusalem Post

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2A Canadian group of art workers is holding a Wikipedia editing event on Oct. 22. The group's stated aim is to "populate Wikipedia entries honouring martyred Palestinian artists and exposing the Canadian, Zionist backers of genocide." Right · 2The National Post names the group Stop Art Washing and the Jerusalem Post names it Artists Against Artwashing. Both quote the same self-description: art workers "across so-called-Canada demanding cultural institutions divest from settler colonialism and genocide." Right · 2According to the National Post, which cites the group's Instagram account, the event is a "Wikipedia 101 session" with "hands-on editing" in Toronto at an undisclosed location. The Jerusalem Post adds that the evening opens with Palestinian short films.

Right · 2Both outlets say the event conflicts with Wikipedia's neutrality rules. The National Post cites the policy against using the site as "a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda" and the requirement of a neutral point of view. The Jerusalem Post says that organising sessions around a predetermined political aim risks undermining the Neutral Point of View policy. Right · 2Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger told the Jerusalem Post that organising people to take a controversial point of view is "canvassing [and] they should be blocked." The National Post said Wikipedia did not respond to its request for comment. Right · 1The Jerusalem Post, which says Jewish Onliner reported the event first and that it confirmed the event independently, reports that the group held an earlier workshop in April targeting articles tied to the Azrieli Foundation. It says edits to the Azrieli Group article were made on April 28 at the time of that workshop, including by a newly registered account that made one edit. It says another account was warned in June about edit warring. The article does not say the edits were made by workshop participants.

Right · 2Both outlets set the event in a wider debate over Wikipedia's coverage of Israel and the conflict. The National Post cites Jimmy Wales calling the "Gaza genocide" entry "one of the worst Wikipedia entries" he had seen, and its own 2024 analysis finding "patterns of anti-Israel bias among power-user editors". The Jerusalem Post cites a new Anti-Defamation League report, "Damage Done", and describes training programmes such as Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor's "WikiRights" in Gaza. Right · 1The National Post also notes that Wikipedia's own page on the topic says edits on the conflict have surged since Oct. 7, 2023, and that its coverage has drawn criticism from "advocates on both sides for perceived bias." It says the Times of Israel reported a similar event in London in 2024. The group's own comment is not included in either report.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets present the event as an organised attempt to push a political viewpoint into Wikipedia, and measure it against the site's neutrality policy and a wider claim of anti-Israel bias on the platform.
Emphasis
The National Post stresses policy breaches and past bias analyses. The Jerusalem Post adds Larry Sanger's view, the group's earlier Azrieli-related workshop, Euro-Med's training in Gaza and the ADL report.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither quotes the organisers' response. Neither includes a Wikipedia editor or the Wikimedia Foundation explaining how such events are normally handled. Neither says what articles on Palestinian artists would need to meet in order to be kept, such as notability and sourcing. The Jerusalem Post does not show that the April edits came from workshop attendees.
Charged language
“anti-Zionist group”“flood Wikipedia”“anti-Israel group”“Hamas-linked organization”“bad-faith editors”
For example
“An anti-Zionist group is hosting an event in Toronto to flood Wikipedia with entries to honour what it refers to as “martyred” Palestinians.” — National Post
“Hamas-linked organization, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, has run several training sessions teaching Gazans to edit Wikipedia pages” — The Jerusalem Post

Ask about this story

Loading…