Skip to content
Bramble

US

Appeals court rejects DOJ bid to force California to set aside ballots

A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 against the Justice Department's effort to make California set aside ballots from voters the administration suspects are noncitizens. The dispute returns to the trial court, with a hearing set for Tuesday.

4 outlets · 2L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: CBS News
Image: The Straits Times
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: Raw Story

1 / 4

The story, neutrally told

Left · 1A federal appeals court on Monday dismissed the Justice Department's effort to force California election officials to set aside thousands of ballots that the Trump administration claims may have been cast by alleged noncitizens. Left · 1Raw Story reported that the panel ruled 2-1 and that the ballots at issue came from more than 20,000 voters suspected of being noncitizens. Left · 1Judge Mark Bennett, appointed by Trump, joined Judge Gabriel Sanchez, appointed by Biden, in the majority, while Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee, dissented, according to Raw Story, which cited legal analyst Kyle Chesney.

Left · 1The majority wrote in its 91-page order that "The United States’s claimed emergency, at least in part, is a self-constructed one," and that the A.A.R.P. plaintiffs "acted as promptly as they could; the United States, here, has not." Left · 1CNN's Katelyn Polantz reported that the dispute now returns to the trial court, where a hearing is scheduled for Tuesday. Left · 1California officials have challenged the reliability of the federal government's voter data.

Left · 1CBS News noted that over the weekend Attorney General Todd Blanche said on "Face the Nation" that the Justice Department is not laying the groundwork to overturn unfavorable election results.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
CBS News ran a straight breaking-news report with a legal-battle explainer. Raw Story presented the ruling as a defeat for the Trump administration.
Emphasis
The court's rejection, the split panel including Trump appointees, and the majority's remark that the emergency was 'self-constructed'.
Leaves out or plays down
No reporting yet on the dissent's reasoning or on the DOJ's evidence for its noncitizen claims. No response from the DOJ.
Charged language
“stinging legal setback”“self-constructed”
For example
“Trump DOJ dealt stinging legal setback as judges toss out ‘self-constructed’ emergency” — Raw Story
“that the Trump administration claims may have been cast by alleged noncitizens” — CBS News

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…