Sydney currency trader fired after employer tracked laptop to Singapore hotel
Charles Graham, a Sydney-based trader at HIFX Australia (Xe), was dismissed after the company traced his laptop to a Singapore hotel while he claimed to be working from home. Australia's Fair Work Commission found a valid reason for the sacking but an unfair process, and ordered no reinstatement or extra compensation.
1 / 1
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Charles Graham, a Sydney-based currency trader at HIFX Australia, which trades as Xe, was fired in December 2025 after his employer found he and his laptop were in Singapore while he said he was working from home. The IndependentLC “Charles Graham had been working for HIFX Australia, which trades as currency exchange company Xe, for 20 months when his employer discovered that both he and his laptop were in Singapore, not Sydney.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “A Sydney-based currency trader was fired after his employer discovered that he was working from Singapore while claiming to be working from home in Australia.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2Xe had rejected his September 2025 request to relocate to Singapore for a year. He held a youth mobility visa he needed to use by mid-November 2025, but the company said his job was based in Sydney and it had no licence to operate in Singapore. The IndependentLC “The trader had a youth mobility visa that he needed to use by mid-November 2025, but the company said his job was based in Sydney and it did not have a licence to operate in Singapore.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “it did not have a licence to operate in Singapore” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2After the refusal, Graham sent a medical certificate saying an eye injury required him to work from home for three months, then took annual leave and went to Singapore. The IndependentLC “After his request was rejected, Mr Graham sent his workplace a medical certificate that claimed he had an eye injury that required him to work from home for three months.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “He then took annual leave and travelled to Singapore, as per the outlet.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Mixed · 2When he did not come back online on 17 November, his manager emailed an IT employee that she would need their "FBI skills" (as reported from The Straits Times), and the checks traced the laptop to an Ibis hotel in Singapore. The IndependentLC “The “FBI skills” tracked him to Singapore’s Ibis hotel.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “The company’s checks eventually traced Graham’s laptop to an Ibis hotel in Singapore.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2Graham said he had meant to return to Australia but postponed his flight because his partner developed a bacterial infection needing treatment. He said the change happened over a weekend, so he did not think to contact his manager, and that by the time he logged on he was swamped with emails, calls and a complaint from a high-value client. The IndependentLC “Mr Graham said he had intended to return to Australia but had to postpone the flight because his partner developed a bacterial infection and needed medical treatment.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “Graham claimed he was overwhelmed by hundreds of unread emails, incoming calls and a complaint from a high-value client” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2Xe's December 2025 termination letter said he had produced neither flight records showing an intention to return nor medical evidence of his partner's illness, and called his conduct "a serious breach of company policy, a failure to follow lawful and reasonable instructions, and an irreparable breakdown of trust and confidence". The IndependentLC ““Your conduct represents a serious breach of company policy, a failure to follow lawful and reasonable instructions, and an irreparable breakdown of trust and confidence,” the letter read.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “In a termination letter issued in December 2025, the company said that Graham had failed to provide flight records” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Mixed · 2Graham challenged the dismissal at the Fair Work Commission. He argued his location was found through "illegal tracking surveillance" and that he had worked from Bali several times in April and May 2025 without reprimand; his manager told the commission she did not know he had been working overseas. The IndependentLC “He argued that his location had been discovered through “illegal tracking surveillance” and said he had previously worked from Bali several times in April and May 2025 without being reprimanded” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “His manager, however, told the commission that she had not known he was working overseas during those earlier periods.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2The company's evidence included a Microsoft Teams message in which Graham asked to work from home to be present for a plumber dealing with recurring bathroom issues, when he was reportedly in Bali. The IndependentLC “Evidence from the company included a message on Microsoft Teams asking to work from home so he could allegedly be present for the plumber.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “The company said that at the time, he was actually in Bali.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗ Mixed · 2Commissioner Alana Matheson found that hiding his Bali location showed Graham knew he needed permission to work abroad, and that his failure to disclose his location before being caught in Singapore "was deliberate and amounted to dishonesty". The IndependentLC “She concluded that his failure to disclose his location before being caught in Singapore “was deliberate and amounted to dishonesty”.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “concealing his location in Bali demonstrated that Graham understood the company’s policy requiring permission to work from another country” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Mixed · 2The commission nonetheless criticised the process: Xe had not explained its reasons for the dismissal, denying him a fair chance to respond, and internal messages suggested the outcome was already decided. It ruled the process unfair last week but accepted Xe had a valid reason, and Graham was not reinstated or given further compensation, having already received four weeks' pay in lieu of notice. The IndependentLC “Mr Graham’s dismissal process was ruled as unfair last week, but the commission acknowledged that Xe had a valid reason to sack him.” Read at The Independent ↗ Hindustan TimesN “Graham, on the other hand, was not reinstated and received no additional compensation, as he had already been paid four weeks’ salary in lieu of notice.” Read at Hindustan Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Presents the case as an employee caught out in deception, leading with the tracked laptop and the "FBI skills" email, with the tribunal's findings in the second half.
- Emphasis
- Graham's earlier Bali trip and the plumber excuse, the medical certificate, and the commission's finding of dishonesty.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not stress that the commission found the dismissal process unfair until the end of the piece.
- Charged language
- “caught secretly on holiday”“FBI skills”
- For example
-
“A Sydney-based currency trader was fired after he was caught secretly on holiday in Singapore, while telling his employer he was “working from home”.” — The Independent
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- A rewrite of The Independent's report, framed as a viral workplace story, with a headline saying he "claims" to work from home and subheads such as "What did the commission say?".
- Emphasis
- The chronology of the deception, Graham's explanations, and the commission's findings.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Leaves out the first-hand detail of the Bali plumber story's origin in the Guardian and relies on The Independent for sourcing.
- Charged language
- “FBI skills”
- For example
-
“Charles Graham had worked for HIFX Australia for 20 months when the company discovered that he was overseas.” — Hindustan Times
“according to a report by The Independent” — Hindustan Times
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Graham, a Sydney-based trader at HIFX Australia (Xe), was fired after being found in Singapore while claiming to work from home.
- The Fair Work Commission found a valid reason for dismissal but an unfair process.
- Graham was not reinstated and received no extra compensation beyond four weeks' pay in lieu of notice.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Graham's earlier work from Bali was tolerated
- Left
- The Independent reports Graham said he had worked from Bali several times in April and May 2025 without reprimand, while his manager said she was unaware.
- Centre
- Hindustan Times reports the same competing accounts, and that his manager said she had not known he was working overseas.
-
Whether the partner's illness explains the delayed return
- Left
- The Independent says Graham gave this as his reason, and Xe "didn't buy it" without flight or medical evidence.
- Centre
- Hindustan Times says Graham "claimed" this and the company rejected it for lack of flight or medical evidence.
Charles Graham person
Says he meant to return but his partner's infection forced him to postpone; argues the tracking was illegal surveillance and that he had worked from Bali before without reprimand.
“He argued that his location had been discovered through “illegal tracking surveillance”” — The Independent
“He said that the change in plans happened over the weekend” — Hindustan Times
HIFX Australia organisation
Says the job was Sydney-based, it had no Singapore licence, and Graham breached policy and trust; its manager says she did not know he had worked abroad earlier.
“the company said his job was based in Sydney and it did not have a licence to operate in Singapore.” — The Independent
“His manager, however, told the commission that she had not known he was working overseas during those earlier periods.” — Hindustan Times
Left1 article
-
Australia-based trader caught working from Singapore after employer tracks laptop to hotel
Critical Tells it as a deception story with colourful detail, then sets out the commission's mixed ruling.

Centre1 article
-
Neutral Secondary retelling of The Independent's report, attributing claims to Graham and the company and summarising the commission's findings.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 13 Oct 06:44 First The IndependentLC Australia-based trader caught working from Singapore after employer tracks laptop to hotel
- 13 Oct 17:13 +10h 30m Hindustan TimesN Australian man claims to be working from home, gets fired after company tracks laptop to Singapore hotel
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…