Skip to content
Bramble

Business

Sydney currency trader fired after employer tracked laptop to Singapore hotel

Charles Graham, a Sydney-based trader at HIFX Australia (Xe), was dismissed after the company traced his laptop to a Singapore hotel while he claimed to be working from home. Australia's Fair Work Commission found a valid reason for the sacking but an unfair process, and ordered no reinstatement or extra compensation.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: The Independent

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Charles Graham, a Sydney-based currency trader at HIFX Australia, which trades as Xe, was fired in December 2025 after his employer found he and his laptop were in Singapore while he said he was working from home. Mixed · 2Xe had rejected his September 2025 request to relocate to Singapore for a year. He held a youth mobility visa he needed to use by mid-November 2025, but the company said his job was based in Sydney and it had no licence to operate in Singapore. Mixed · 2After the refusal, Graham sent a medical certificate saying an eye injury required him to work from home for three months, then took annual leave and went to Singapore.

Mixed · 2When he did not come back online on 17 November, his manager emailed an IT employee that she would need their "FBI skills" (as reported from The Straits Times), and the checks traced the laptop to an Ibis hotel in Singapore. Mixed · 2Graham said he had meant to return to Australia but postponed his flight because his partner developed a bacterial infection needing treatment. He said the change happened over a weekend, so he did not think to contact his manager, and that by the time he logged on he was swamped with emails, calls and a complaint from a high-value client. Mixed · 2Xe's December 2025 termination letter said he had produced neither flight records showing an intention to return nor medical evidence of his partner's illness, and called his conduct "a serious breach of company policy, a failure to follow lawful and reasonable instructions, and an irreparable breakdown of trust and confidence".

Mixed · 2Graham challenged the dismissal at the Fair Work Commission. He argued his location was found through "illegal tracking surveillance" and that he had worked from Bali several times in April and May 2025 without reprimand; his manager told the commission she did not know he had been working overseas. Mixed · 2The company's evidence included a Microsoft Teams message in which Graham asked to work from home to be present for a plumber dealing with recurring bathroom issues, when he was reportedly in Bali. Mixed · 2Commissioner Alana Matheson found that hiding his Bali location showed Graham knew he needed permission to work abroad, and that his failure to disclose his location before being caught in Singapore "was deliberate and amounted to dishonesty".

Mixed · 2The commission nonetheless criticised the process: Xe had not explained its reasons for the dismissal, denying him a fair chance to respond, and internal messages suggested the outcome was already decided. It ruled the process unfair last week but accepted Xe had a valid reason, and Graham was not reinstated or given further compensation, having already received four weeks' pay in lieu of notice.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Presents the case as an employee caught out in deception, leading with the tracked laptop and the "FBI skills" email, with the tribunal's findings in the second half.
Emphasis
Graham's earlier Bali trip and the plumber excuse, the medical certificate, and the commission's finding of dishonesty.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not stress that the commission found the dismissal process unfair until the end of the piece.
Charged language
“caught secretly on holiday”“FBI skills”
For example
“A Sydney-based currency trader was fired after he was caught secretly on holiday in Singapore, while telling his employer he was “working from home”.” — The Independent

Centre1 outlet

Framing
A rewrite of The Independent's report, framed as a viral workplace story, with a headline saying he "claims" to work from home and subheads such as "What did the commission say?".
Emphasis
The chronology of the deception, Graham's explanations, and the commission's findings.
Leaves out or plays down
Leaves out the first-hand detail of the Bali plumber story's origin in the Guardian and relies on The Independent for sourcing.
Charged language
“FBI skills”
For example
“Charles Graham had worked for HIFX Australia for 20 months when the company discovered that he was overseas.” — Hindustan Times
“according to a report by The Independent” — Hindustan Times

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…