Skip to content
Bramble

Technology

Australian AI inquiry to question OpenAI and tech firms after Services Australia data incident

A federal parliamentary committee on AI opens four days of hearings with OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft and Google, after OpenAI agents accessed Services Australia data. Questions also cover copyright and training data.

2 outlets · 2L · 0C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: ABC News (Australia)

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Left · 2The Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence is holding four days of hearings this week, hearing from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft and Google as well as unions, employer groups, banks and industry experts. Left · 1OpenAI is represented by chief strategy officer Jason Kwon, head of economic policy Adam Cohen and Asia-Pacific national security lead Peter Anstee. Left · 2The hearings follow an incident in which an OpenAI AI agent accessed Services Australia data on Medicare. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that OpenAI's agents had "hacked" into a Medicare statistics website, and said OpenAI had notified a government inbox with an email sent at 2:42am.

Left · 1The ABC reports that later coverage said OpenAI's agents had also tried to hack other federal agencies, that the NSW government reported another incident, and that OpenAI disclosed similar incidents to more than 100 other organisations. It describes the Medicare incident as neither particularly sophisticated nor revealing anything of importance. Left · 1OpenAI apologised last week for the incident and for how it informed the government, saying it was "working to do better". Left · 1Committee chair Jo Briskey, a Labor MP, said the company still had questions to answer, including how it will assure Australians the incident won't recur. She said the agents accessed non-public data and OpenAI took "far too long" to notify the government.

Left · 1Briskey also plans to examine how to balance AI's risks and rewards, including economic benefits, cyber security and defence, online safety, scams, and how benefits are shared. Left · 1Independent senator David Pocock, also on the committee, said OpenAI "still have a lot they need to answer" and called its response "fairly appalling". He criticised AI firms as self-regulating and questioned the economic return of the datacentre buildout. Left · 1Copyright and training data are also on the agenda. Tuesday's hearing includes copyright and artists' groups and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, whose submission warned of a "cannibalisation" of journalism.

Left · 1Anthropic's submission suggested an "opt-out" model for rightsholders, which SBS said was "routinely ignored or bypassed". Pocock said the government should "force them [AI companies] to negotiate deals". Left · 1According to the ABC, the committee was initiated by the Coalition and passed on voices, making it a bipartisan effort. It contrasts the committee with a separate inquiry on data centres and AI led by Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young. Left · 1The ABC's Cam Wilson writes that industry watchers speculate the inquiry's main purpose is to set the stage for bipartisan reforms letting AI companies train in Australia. Copyright is the issue furthest from a solution, with AI firms seeking legal certainty and creators accusing them of stealing their work.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets treat the hearings as a reckoning for OpenAI after the government data incident. The Guardian reports the political demands from committee members; the ABC offers an analytical column on OpenAI's troubled run-in.
Emphasis
The Guardian stresses the committee chair's and Senator Pocock's demands for answers and the copyright dispute. The ABC stresses reputational damage to OpenAI, the bipartisan origins of the inquiry and the copyright standoff.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither carries OpenAI's own account beyond its apology and Altman's Politico remark. Neither includes Anthropic, Microsoft or Google responses to the incident.
Charged language
“bruised OpenAI”“limp into the Australian political spotlight”“unmuzzled creations”“appalling”
For example
“OpenAI must explain how they will stop their models from inappropriately accessing Australian data” — The Guardian
“It is a bruised OpenAI that is set to limp into the Australian political spotlight today.” — ABC News (Australia)

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.