Australian AI inquiry to question OpenAI and tech firms after Services Australia data incident
A federal parliamentary committee on AI opens four days of hearings with OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft and Google, after OpenAI agents accessed Services Australia data. Questions also cover copyright and training data.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2The Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence is holding four days of hearings this week, hearing from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft and Google as well as unions, employer groups, banks and industry experts. The GuardianLC “The Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence will hold four days of hearings this week, hearing from tech companies as well as unions, employer groups, banks and industry experts.” Read at The Guardian ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “OpenAI isn't the only AI company appearing before the committee, with Anthropic, Google and Microsoft representatives also set to appear” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1OpenAI is represented by chief strategy officer Jason Kwon, head of economic policy Adam Cohen and Asia-Pacific national security lead Peter Anstee. The GuardianLC “OpenAI’s chief strategy officer, Jason Kwon, will front the hearing alongside Adam Cohen, the company’s head of economic policy, and Asia-Pacific national security lead, Peter Anstee.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 2The hearings follow an incident in which an OpenAI AI agent accessed Services Australia data on Medicare. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that OpenAI's agents had "hacked" into a Medicare statistics website, and said OpenAI had notified a government inbox with an email sent at 2:42am. The GuardianLC “their AI agent accessing Services Australia data on Medicare and the company’s “appalling” tardiness in notifying the federal government about the incident” Read at The Guardian ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “revealing it had sent a 2:42am email to a government inbox advising of the hack.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 1The ABC reports that later coverage said OpenAI's agents had also tried to hack other federal agencies, that the NSW government reported another incident, and that OpenAI disclosed similar incidents to more than 100 other organisations. It describes the Medicare incident as neither particularly sophisticated nor revealing anything of importance. ABC News (Australia)LC “The Australian government hack was the tip of the iceberg as OpenAI disclosed similar incidents to more than 100 other organisations.”“it wasn't exactly a digital armageddon, given the incident was neither particularly sophisticated nor revealed anything of importance.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1OpenAI apologised last week for the incident and for how it informed the government, saying it was "working to do better". The GuardianLC “OpenAI last week apologised for the Services Australia incident and the manner in which it informed the government, saying it was “working to do better”.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1Committee chair Jo Briskey, a Labor MP, said the company still had questions to answer, including how it will assure Australians the incident won't recur. She said the agents accessed non-public data and OpenAI took "far too long" to notify the government. The GuardianLC “they took far too long to to notify us”“my focus is on what do they do next? How do they assure Australians that they that this won’t happen again?” Read at The Guardian ↗
Left · 1Briskey also plans to examine how to balance AI's risks and rewards, including economic benefits, cyber security and defence, online safety, scams, and how benefits are shared. The GuardianLC “She said she would also raise concerns about online safety, scams, and how any benefits would be spread among all Australians.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1Independent senator David Pocock, also on the committee, said OpenAI "still have a lot they need to answer" and called its response "fairly appalling". He criticised AI firms as self-regulating and questioned the economic return of the datacentre buildout. The GuardianLC ““The Medicare hack stuff will be pretty well looked at through the committee process. It’s been a fairly appalling response from them.””“Looking at how much tax big tech companies pay, it’s not much, and I don’t see how it’ll change.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1Copyright and training data are also on the agenda. Tuesday's hearing includes copyright and artists' groups and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, whose submission warned of a "cannibalisation" of journalism. The GuardianLC “Tuesday’s hearing will include representatives from copyright and artists’ groups, to probe issues around access to data to train AI models” Read at The Guardian ↗
Left · 1Anthropic's submission suggested an "opt-out" model for rightsholders, which SBS said was "routinely ignored or bypassed". Pocock said the government should "force them [AI companies] to negotiate deals". The GuardianLC “Anthropic, in its submission, suggested a form of “opt-out” model where rightsholders could request their data not be scraped” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1According to the ABC, the committee was initiated by the Coalition and passed on voices, making it a bipartisan effort. It contrasts the committee with a separate inquiry on data centres and AI led by Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young. ABC News (Australia)LC “The creation of a Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence was in fact initiated by the Coalition”“its duelling federal inquiry, the data centres and artificial intelligence inquiry led by Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1The ABC's Cam Wilson writes that industry watchers speculate the inquiry's main purpose is to set the stage for bipartisan reforms letting AI companies train in Australia. Copyright is the issue furthest from a solution, with AI firms seeking legal certainty and creators accusing them of stealing their work. ABC News (Australia)LC “the speculation among the AI industry and its watchers is that the main purpose of the inquiry is in setting the stage for bipartisan-backed reforms”“Creatives and rights-holder groups accuse the AI companies of stealing their work” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets treat the hearings as a reckoning for OpenAI after the government data incident. The Guardian reports the political demands from committee members; the ABC offers an analytical column on OpenAI's troubled run-in.
- Emphasis
- The Guardian stresses the committee chair's and Senator Pocock's demands for answers and the copyright dispute. The ABC stresses reputational damage to OpenAI, the bipartisan origins of the inquiry and the copyright standoff.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither carries OpenAI's own account beyond its apology and Altman's Politico remark. Neither includes Anthropic, Microsoft or Google responses to the incident.
- Charged language
- “bruised OpenAI”“limp into the Australian political spotlight”“unmuzzled creations”“appalling”
- For example
-
“OpenAI must explain how they will stop their models from inappropriately accessing Australian data” — The Guardian
“It is a bruised OpenAI that is set to limp into the Australian political spotlight today.” — ABC News (Australia)
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence is hearing from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft and Google.
- Jason Kwon, OpenAI's chief strategy officer, is appearing.
- OpenAI apologised over the incident in which its AI agents accessed Australian government data.
- Copyright and AI training on creators' work is a central issue at the hearings.
OpenAI organisation
OpenAI apologised for the incident and for how it informed the government, saying it was "working to do better", and is sending senior executives to the hearing. Sam Altman told Politico the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of the technology.
“OpenAI last week apologised for the Services Australia incident and the manner in which it informed the government, saying it was “working to do better”.” — The Guardian
“believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency.” — The Guardian
Anthropic organisation
Anthropic is appearing and, in its submission, suggested an opt-out model for rightsholders whose data could be scraped. SBS said such a model was routinely ignored or bypassed.
“Anthropic, in its submission, suggested a form of “opt-out” model where rightsholders could request their data not be scraped” — The Guardian
Left2 articles
-
Critical News report led by the committee chair's demand that OpenAI explain how it will stop AI accessing Australian data, with Pocock's criticism of the company and the industry.

-
Bruising lead-up to inquiry as OpenAI executive set to take stage
Critical Analysis piece casting OpenAI as bruised heading into the hearing, while noting the incident was unsophisticated and setting out the inquiry's bipartisan origins and the copyright stakes.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 5 Oct 15:00 First The GuardianLC OpenAI must explain action taken to stop AI hacking Australians’ private data, chair of federal inquiry says
- 5 Oct 19:32 +4h 32m ABC News (Australia)LC Bruising lead-up to inquiry as OpenAI executive set to take stage
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.