Privacy commissioner opens formal investigation into Chinese smart glasses app maker
Australia's privacy commissioner has opened a formal investigation into Shenzhen Qingcheng, the Chinese maker of the HeyCyan app used in cheap smart glasses sold by Kmart and others, after it failed to respond to her inquiries.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2The Australian privacy commissioner, Carly Kind, has launched a formal investigation into Shenzhen Qingcheng Future Technology Co, the China-based software company behind the HeyCyan app used in cheap smart glasses sold in Australia. ABC News (Australia)LC “The Australian privacy commissioner has launched a formal investigation into the Chinese software company behind an influx of cheap smart glasses to Australia.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The GuardianLC “The Australian privacy regulator has opened an investigation into the China-based software company behind the HeyCyan app in Kmart’s $89 smartglasses” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 2Kind said the company did not respond to her office's multiple attempts to obtain information and did not acknowledge receipt of them; the Guardian reports she also cited concerns from third-party analysis of the technology and the company's privacy policy. ABC News (Australia)LC “The company did not respond at all to our multiple attempts to obtain information” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The GuardianLC “as well as concerns arising from third party analysis of the technology itself as well as the entity’s privacy policy” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 2The regulator also made preliminary inquiries with Meta, Google, Kmart and importer BDI Technology, but none of them is subject to a formal investigation. ABC News (Australia)LC “The regulator also made preliminary inquiries with Meta, Google, Kmart, and an importer called BDI Technology” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The GuardianLC “None of the other companies will be investigated as part of this process, Kind said.” Read at The Guardian ↗
Left · 1An ABC investigation last month reported more than a dozen serious security flaws in the HeyCyan app and website; independent testing found users' email addresses, dates of birth, images and videos exposed, devices that could be hijacked over Bluetooth without a password, and data sometimes sent to Chinese servers. ABC News (Australia)LC “Independent testing of the low-cost glasses found Australians' sensitive data including email address, date of birth, images and videos were left exposed to hackers.”“the devices could be hijacked by nearby attackers without a password using only a Bluetooth connection, and that data was in some cases being sent to Chinese servers.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1Kind said the ABC's reporting raised the prospect that reasonable steps had not been taken to secure user information, and that her office had a range of concerns, including possible use of facial recognition technology. ABC News (Australia)LC “raised the prospect that there haven't been reasonable steps taken to secure [user] information”“She said her office had "a range of concerns" about the practices of the company” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1A formal investigation lets the commissioner compel the company to provide information; if it keeps ignoring her she can seek a court injunction to limit supply of its products, and Kind said the Privacy Act allows penalties of $50 million per contravention, which can be applied per individual, should concerns be borne out. ABC News (Australia)LC “A formal investigation means the privacy commissioner will now have the power to compel Shenzhen Qingcheng to provide information about how it is complying with Australian laws.”“$50 million per contravention … and that can be applied per individual” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 2Kind has written to the Australian Retail Council and other retailers putting them on notice and urging them to reconsider selling the product, and the Guardian reported the glasses had been removed from Kmart's website as of Wednesday, with Kmart approached for comment. ABC News (Australia)LC “We have written to the Australian Retail Council and to other retailers putting them on notice that this company is under investigation” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The GuardianLC “The glasses were removed from Kmart’s website as of Wednesday.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1Attorney-General Michelle Rowland asked the regulator in August to prioritise the issue amid calls for an import ban; the government has decided against an import ban for now but is considering a limited ban in public service workplaces. ABC News (Australia)LC “Attorney-General Michelle Rowland took the unusual step of asking the regulator in August to prioritise the issue amid calls for an import ban.”“The federal government has decided not to place an import ban on smart glasses at this stage” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1Public concern has been sizeable: a GetUp petition has more than 55,000 signatures, and councils including Canterbury-Bankstown, Sydney City, Brisbane and Yarra have banned the glasses from some venues. The GuardianLC “A GetUp petition has had more than 55,000 signatures calling to restrict the use of what has been labelled as “pervert glasses””“Canterbury-Bankstown and Sydney City are among the councils in Sydney to have banned the glasses from some venues” Read at The Guardian ↗
Left · 1Kind noted the Privacy Act covers companies and Commonwealth agencies, not individual users, and that retailers or manufacturers may have no obligations if they collect no personal information; the software provider is likely the entity that holds the data. She said proposed reforms, including a 'fair and reasonable' test, would raise the bar for what smartglasses can collect. The GuardianLC “the entity providing the software at use in the device is likely to be the entity that collects and holds the information for the purpose of privacy law.”“The most substantial change will be the replacement of the ‘reasonably necessary for an entity’s functions and activities’ test with a ‘fair and reasonable’ test” Read at The Guardian ↗ Left · 1A legal representative for Shenzhen Qingcheng told the ABC that engineers had fixed the flaws, but analysts from NSB Cyber and Abstract Shield found that as of 2 October many fixes had not worked or were incomplete. ABC News (Australia)LC “A legal representative for the company said engineers had since fixed security flaws pointed out by the ABC.”“many of the fixes had not worked, or were incomplete, as of October 2.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both left-leaning outlets treat the probe as a regulatory response to public alarm, using the 'pervert glasses' nickname. The ABC leads with its own security investigation and the company's silence; the Guardian leads with the regulator's announcement and the retail and legal context.
- Emphasis
- ABC: security flaws, company ignoring the regulator, penalties and the unfixed vulnerabilities. Guardian: public backlash (petition, council bans), limits of privacy law, proposed reforms.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The Guardian does not mention the security flaws found by the ABC or the company's claim to have fixed them; the ABC does not mention the petition, council bans or Kmart removing the product. Neither includes a response from the company beyond the ABC's legal representative.
- Charged language
- “pervert glasses”
- For example
-
“nicknamed "pervert glasses" by their detractors” — ABC News (Australia)
“following public outrage over the covert use of the devices” — The Guardian
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The privacy commissioner has opened a formal investigation into Shenzhen Qingcheng, maker of the HeyCyan app.
- Meta, Google, Kmart and BDI Technology were contacted but are not under formal investigation.
- The government is considering restricting the glasses in public service workplaces.
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner organisation
Through Commissioner Carly Kind, the regulator says the company ignored its inquiries, that it has concerns including possible facial recognition, and that it will pursue substantial penalties if concerns are borne out.
“That would be what we would be shooting for, should our concerns be borne out” — ABC News (Australia)
“Kind announced an investigation has been opened into Shenzhen Qingcheng after it failed to respond to inquiries” — The Guardian
Kmart organisation
Kmart is not under formal investigation; the regulator urged retailers to reconsider sales, and the glasses were removed from its website, with comment sought.
“The retailer has been approached for comment.” — The Guardian
“none of the other companies are the subject of a formal investigation” — ABC News (Australia)
Left2 articles
-
Chinese company to face Australian privacy probe over 'pervert' glasses
Critical Presents the probe as the result of the ABC's own investigation, stressing the company's silence and the unfixed flaws.
-
Privacy watchdog launches investigation into China-based company behind Kmart ‘pervert glasses’ app
Neutral Reports the probe within the wider public backlash and explains the limits of privacy law and planned reforms.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 6 Oct 20:00 First ABC News (Australia)LC Chinese company to face Australian privacy probe over 'pervert' glasses
- 7 Oct 03:00 +7h The GuardianLC Privacy watchdog launches investigation into China-based company behind Kmart ‘pervert glasses’ app
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.