Australian regulator proposes tighter sunscreen SPF testing after Choice found 16 of 20 failed
The Therapeutic Goods Administration has proposed stricter SPF testing and reporting rules for sunscreens, following 2025 Choice tests in which 16 of 20 popular products missed their label claims. Some changes could come soon; others need consultation or legislation.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2Australia's medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), has released proposed reforms to tighten SPF testing of sunscreens. ABC News (Australia)LC “The proposed changes have been put forward today by Australia's medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “Australia is proposing tougher rules for sunscreen manufacturers” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2The proposals follow 2025 testing by consumer group Choice, which found that 16 of 20 popular sunscreens did not meet their SPF label claims. ABC News (Australia)LC “Choice testing revealed 16 out of 20 popular sunscreens failed to meet their SPF label claims.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “The findings came to light in 2025, when consumer group Choice tested popular sunscreens” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2One SPF 50+ product, Ultra Violette's Lean Screen Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen, returned an SPF of just four and was later recalled, followed by 19 other products sharing the same base formula; the company's co-founders apologised and offered refunds. ABC News (Australia)LC “One 50+ sunscreen that returned an SPF result of just four was later recalled, followed by 19 others which shared the same base formula.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “The company’s co-founders, Ava Chandler-Matthews and Bec Jefferd, apologised to customers last year, offered them refunds” Read at The Independent ↗
Left · 2Under the proposals, brands would have to test the finished product rather than just the base formula before listing it, retest periodically over its shelf life, and give results to the TGA in confidence before the product goes on sale. ABC News (Australia)LC “brands would need to do SPF testing on their finished product before listing it with the TGA, rather than just the base formula.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “Brands would have to submit their results to the regulator before putting products on sale and repeat testing throughout their shelf life.” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2Currently makers need not give SPF data to the TGA unless asked, and the TGA said it would not routinely check the data before products reach shelves. ABC News (Australia)LC “Currently, sunscreen makers do not have to provide SPF testing data to the TGA unless requested” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “the TGA would not routinely check the data before products reached shop shelves” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2The TGA considered making test results public but declined, citing confidentiality, intellectual property and the risk that technical data would be misinterpreted. ABC News (Australia)LC “there were concerns about confidentiality, intellectual property and potential misinterpretation of highly technical SPF data.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “citing concerns about commercial confidentiality, intellectual property and the risk that consumers might misinterpret technical data.” Read at The Independent ↗
Left · 1ABC News reports the TGA would also allow "in vitro" testing on plastic plates, instead of the current required "in vivo" testing on human volunteers, because of concerns about variability in in vivo results; in vivo would not be replaced entirely, as in vitro may not suit some formulations or water-resistance testing. ABC News (Australia)LC “Companies would be allowed to test their products using an "in vitro" method, which involves testing sunscreen by putting sunscreen onto a plastic plate instead of human skin.”“It said in vivo would not be replaced entirely, because the in vitro method may not be suitable for some formulations or water-resistant SPF testing.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1The TGA also proposes strengthened international accreditation of testing laboratories, which it does not currently regulate or accredit, while acknowledging this could make testing costlier and harder to access; ABC said its own investigation found more than half of the failing sunscreens had used an overseas lab whose results experts questioned. ABC News (Australia)LC “The TGA has also proposed improvements to oversight of laboratories performing SPF testing, as it currently does not regulate or accredit them.”“more than half of the sunscreens that failed to meet their SPF label claims had used an overseas lab, which had its results called into question by experts.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 2The Independent adds that the TGA wants to limit SPF claims on foundations and other cosmetics that can advertise SPF 50+ without sun protection being their main purpose, and that the TGA is still weighing changes to SPF labelling, including a "low" to "very high" format. The IndependentLC “The TGA wants to limit the SPF claims these products can make” Read at The Independent ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “Three options were proposed during consultation, including moving from the current number-based system to a "low", "medium", "high" and "very high" format.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 2TGA chief medical adviser Robyn Langham said the investigation found multiple factors that could contribute to low SPF results, not a single cause, and that the reforms aim to make SPF claims more reliable and give the TGA faster access to evidence. ABC News (Australia)LC “"Our investigation has identified multiple factors that could contribute to low SPF results — not a single cause,"” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ The IndependentLC “This is about making SPF claims more reliable, reinforcing suppliers’ responsibility for their products, and giving the TGA faster access to evidence when concerns arise,” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 1Choice's Andy Kelly welcomed the proposals, but Choice said results should be public and that the TGA should routinely monitor them and run its own compliance testing. The IndependentLC “Andy Kelly, Choice’s director of consumer impact, welcomed the proposals but said the regulator needed to go further.” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 2The reforms are not yet in force: the TGA received 119 submissions in a consultation from March to May 2026, and says some changes could come in the short term while others need further consultation or legislation. The IndependentLC “The TGA received 119 submissions during a consultation held between March and May 2026” Read at The Independent ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “others will require further consultation and may need legislative amendments.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 1Open questions remain: the TGA has not released the results of its investigation into the Choice findings, and it is unclear how the reforms would affect sunscreens already on sale. ABC News (Australia)LC “The TGA has not released the results of its investigation into Choice's sunscreen testing from more than a year ago, and it is unclear how the proposed reforms will affect sunscreens already on the market.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present the proposals as a regulatory response to a consumer-confidence scandal, noting the limits of the plan (confidentiality, no routine checks).
- Emphasis
- ABC stresses technical detail (in vitro testing, lab oversight, unanswered questions); The Independent stresses Choice's call for more transparency, the Ultra Violette case and skin cancer rates.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The Independent omits the in vitro testing change and lab-accreditation proposals; ABC omits Choice's response and the cosmetics SPF-claim limits.
- Charged language
- “sweeping reforms”“SPF scandal”
- For example
-
“Consumer faith was battered last year when Choice testing revealed 16 out of 20 popular sunscreens failed to meet their SPF label claims.” — ABC News (Australia)
“the regulator needed to go further” — The Independent
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Choice testing found 16 of 20 popular sunscreens missed their SPF claims.
- The TGA proposes finished-product testing, shelf-life retesting and confidential submission of results before sale.
- The TGA would not routinely check the data and decided against publishing results.
- Some changes could be short-term; others need consultation or legislation.
Therapeutic Goods Administration organisation
The TGA says the proposals make SPF claims more reliable and give it faster access to evidence, and that investigation found multiple causes of low results. It declined to make test data public and will not routinely check it.
“Australians expect the SPF on the label to be backed by robust evidence.” — ABC News (Australia)
“The TGA considered publishing the results but decided against it” — The Independent
Oceania1 outlet
ABC gives a technical, domestic-policy account focused on testing methods, lab oversight and unresolved questions.
“The TGA has also proposed improvements to oversight of laboratories performing SPF testing” — ABC News (Australia)
ABC News (Australia)
UK and Ireland1 outlet
The Independent summarises for an international audience, adding background on the Ultra Violette recall and Australian skin cancer rates.
“Australia has the highest rate of skin cancer in the world” — The Independent
The Independent
Left2 articles
-
Plans unveiled to tighten sunscreen testing after SPF scandal
Neutral Detailed explainer of the TGA's proposals, flagging gaps such as unreleased investigation results and unclear effect on existing products.
-
Australia to tighten sunscreen testing after popular products fail protection claims
Neutral Concise international report on the proposals, adding Choice's call for greater transparency and skin cancer context.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 26 Oct 19:01 First ABC News (Australia)LC Plans unveiled to tighten sunscreen testing after SPF scandal
- 27 Oct 09:27 +14h 26m The IndependentLC Australia to tighten sunscreen testing after popular products fail protection claims
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…