Skip to content
Bramble

Business

Bank of America hit with $1.2bn US Treasury penalties over money laundering, sanctions failures

The US Treasury announced more than $1.21 billion in penalties on Bank of America for anti-money laundering and sanctions violations, the third-largest in its history. The bank admitted willful Bank Secrecy Act violations.

6 outlets · 2L · 2C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: NBC News
Image: BNO News
Image: New York Post
Image: The National
Image: ABC News

1 / 5

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The US Treasury Department announced on Tuesday 13 October 2026 that it was imposing more than $1.21 billion in penalties on Bank of America for violations of anti-money laundering and sanctions laws. Mixed · 2Treasury said the penalty is the third-largest in its history. Mixed · 2The total includes a $750 million civil money penalty from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), described by NBC News and BNO News as the largest in that agency's history; the OCC cited a "deficient and ineffective" anti-money laundering compliance program.

Mixed · 2In its resolution with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Bank of America admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act and failed to maintain an adequate anti-money laundering program, and NBC News reports it also admitted failing to file mandatory Suspicious Activity Reports. Mixed · 2Treasury said the bank failed to timely report to FinCEN over $5 billion in suspicious transactions, more than $1 billion of which implicated national security and other priority illicit finance risks, including indicators of Chinese money laundering networks, fraud and potential trade-based money laundering with a substantial nexus to the southwest border. Mixed · 3Separately, Bank of America agreed an $11.6 million settlement with the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) covering 475 apparent violations of sanctions programs, including those targeting Russia, Belarus, Iran, Burma, Somalia, narcotics and global terrorism.

Centre · 1According to BNO News, Treasury said the bank prioritised revenue while limiting compliance resources, and that FinCEN also ordered it to review past transactions and undergo independent reviews of its monitoring, customer checks and foreign-financial-institution accounts. Centre · 1BNO News also reports the OCC found significant deficiencies remained despite a December 2024 order requiring improvements. Mixed · 2Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that when a bank of this size fails its obligations, the consequences "extend far beyond its own walls", and that the actions "send a clear message that even the biggest financial institutions are not above the law".

Left · 1Bank of America is the second-largest US bank, with more than 70 million clients, and is due to report third-quarter earnings before 7:00 a.m. ET on Wednesday; the coverage quotes no response from the bank.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
NBC News leads with the scale of the penalty as 'historic' and gives the bank's size and customer reach as context.
Emphasis
Record OCC fine, bank's 70 million clients and payment volumes, sanctions programs involved, upcoming earnings.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the December 2024 OCC order or Treasury's finding that the bank prioritised revenue.
Charged language
“historic”
For example
“Bank of America ordered to pay historic $1.2 billion over alleged sanctions law violations” — NBC News

Centre2 outlets

Framing
BNO News gives a detailed, factual rundown of each agency's penalty and findings.
Emphasis
Compliance failings, revenue prioritised over compliance, required reviews, the December 2024 order, OFAC details.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the bank's response.
For example
“The Treasury Department said the bank prioritized revenue while limiting compliance resources, allowing suspicious activity to remain uninvestigated for extended periods.” — BNO News

Right2 outlets

Framing
Washington Examiner and the New York Post (AP copy) present it as a Treasury enforcement action; the Examiner ties it to the administration's push on banks and to Chinese networks and the southern border.
Emphasis
Southern border and Chinese money laundering links, Bessent's statements, administration efforts.
Leaves out or plays down
The AP copy in the Post omits the breakdown and the admissions of willful violation; neither gives the bank's response.
Charged language
“criminals operating on the southern border”
For example
“facilitating payments that may have involved Chinese money laundering networks and criminals operating on the southern border” — Washington Examiner
“The penalties are part of the administration’s efforts to go after banks that don’t meet sanctions and anti-money laundering obligations” — Washington Examiner

Ask about this story

Loading…