Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Barrister ordered to pay about £7,000 after joining tribunal hearing from a train in Germany

Employment barrister Michael Engelhardt-Sprack was ordered to pay wasted costs after a Birmingham tribunal hearing was aborted when they joined by video from a noisy train in Germany.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Mail
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Barrister Michael Engelhardt-Sprack has been ordered to pay wasted costs of £6,767.44, reported as about £7,000, after joining an employment tribunal hearing by video link from a train in Germany. Engelhardt-Sprack, an employment and housing law specialist at Garden Court Chambers in London, told the tribunal they live permanently in Germany with their family while practising in the UK. They were representing Shannon Burns, a technology executive dismissed after falling asleep in a sauna while drunk. A tribunal found her male colleagues had also been drunk that night, and she won her case.

A tribunal judge had allowed Engelhardt-Sprack to attend the first day remotely. The hearing was delayed by 20 minutes before they connected, wearing headphones on the train. Engelhardt-Sprack said they could conduct the case, but the judge ruled the setting was "not a suitably quiet environment". Instead of finding a quiet place, they boarded another train. Costs hearing judge Rachel Wedderspoon said passengers' background noise could be heard and the connection was poor. She ruled that one day of the hearing was "aborted and wasted".

The case resumed the next day with Engelhardt-Sprack attending the Birmingham tribunal in person. Burns is now pursuing a £76million damages claim against the company, now owned by OpenAI, with a hearing to follow. Both outlets compare the case with that of solicitor Priyank Tanwar, struck off after falsely telling a county court judge he was working remotely from London when he was in Germany, and ordered to pay £7,500 in costs.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets run the story as a light, embarrassing-lapse tale, leading on the noisy train and the £7,000 bill, with the sauna dismissal and the £76million claim as colour.
Emphasis
The train setting, the barrister's decision to board another train, the judge's quotes, and the comparison with the struck-off solicitor Priyank Tanwar.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither outlet includes a response from Engelhardt-Sprack or Garden Court Chambers, or says whether the order will be appealed.
Charged language
“noisy train”“dialling into”
For example
“Instead of finding a quiet place, Mr Engelhardt-Sprack took another train.” — Daily Mail
“His case draws inevitable comparisons with that of solicitor Priyank Tanwar” — GB News