Barrister ordered to pay about £7,000 after joining tribunal hearing from a train in Germany
Employment barrister Michael Engelhardt-Sprack was ordered to pay wasted costs after a Birmingham tribunal hearing was aborted when they joined by video from a noisy train in Germany.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Barrister Michael Engelhardt-Sprack has been ordered to pay wasted costs of £6,767.44, reported as about £7,000, after joining an employment tribunal hearing by video link from a train in Germany. Daily MailR “Mr Engelhardt-Sprack was ordered to pay £6,767.44 in wasted costs.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “An employment law barrister has been ordered to pay £7,000 in wasted costs” Read at GB News ↗ Engelhardt-Sprack, an employment and housing law specialist at Garden Court Chambers in London, told the tribunal they live permanently in Germany with their family while practising in the UK. Daily MailR “despite practising in the UK he lived permanently in Germany with his family” Read at Daily Mail ↗ They were representing Shannon Burns, a technology executive dismissed after falling asleep in a sauna while drunk. A tribunal found her male colleagues had also been drunk that night, and she won her case. Daily MailR “Ms Burns won her case after a tribunal found her male colleagues were also drunk the same night she fell asleep in a sauna.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “with the panel determining that her male colleagues had also been intoxicated on the same evening” Read at GB News ↗
A tribunal judge had allowed Engelhardt-Sprack to attend the first day remotely. The hearing was delayed by 20 minutes before they connected, wearing headphones on the train. GB NewsR “A tribunal judge had granted Mr Engelhardt-Sprack permission to attend the first day of the hearing remotely.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “The case was initially postponed for 20 minutes” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Engelhardt-Sprack said they could conduct the case, but the judge ruled the setting was "not a suitably quiet environment". Instead of finding a quiet place, they boarded another train. Daily MailR “the judge ruled it was 'not a suitably quiet environment'” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “the barrister opted to board a second train” Read at GB News ↗ Costs hearing judge Rachel Wedderspoon said passengers' background noise could be heard and the connection was poor. She ruled that one day of the hearing was "aborted and wasted". Daily MailR “'the internet connection was poor and it was difficult to hear the representative above the other noise'” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “Judge Wedderspoon determined that "one day of the hearing was aborted and wasted".” Read at GB News ↗
The case resumed the next day with Engelhardt-Sprack attending the Birmingham tribunal in person. Burns is now pursuing a £76million damages claim against the company, now owned by OpenAI, with a hearing to follow. Daily MailR “She has now claimed damages of £76million against the company” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “That claim is set to be heard at a future date.” Read at GB News ↗ Both outlets compare the case with that of solicitor Priyank Tanwar, struck off after falsely telling a county court judge he was working remotely from London when he was in Germany, and ordered to pay £7,500 in costs. Daily MailR “Priyank Tanwar being struck off the solicitors' roll” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “The court permanently barred him from practising law and ordered him to pay £7,500 in costs.” Read at GB News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets run the story as a light, embarrassing-lapse tale, leading on the noisy train and the £7,000 bill, with the sauna dismissal and the £76million claim as colour.
- Emphasis
- The train setting, the barrister's decision to board another train, the judge's quotes, and the comparison with the struck-off solicitor Priyank Tanwar.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither outlet includes a response from Engelhardt-Sprack or Garden Court Chambers, or says whether the order will be appealed.
- Charged language
- “noisy train”“dialling into”
- For example
-
“Instead of finding a quiet place, Mr Engelhardt-Sprack took another train.” — Daily Mail
“His case draws inevitable comparisons with that of solicitor Priyank Tanwar” — GB News
What every side reports
- Engelhardt-Sprack was ordered to pay wasted costs of about £7,000 after joining a hearing from a train in Germany.
- Judge Rachel Wedderspoon said the noise and poor connection made the hearing unworkable and that a day was wasted.
- The hearing resumed the next day in person in Birmingham.
- Shannon Burns won her case and is pursuing a £76million damages claim.
Michael Engelhardt-Sprack person
Engelhardt-Sprack is reported as having assured the tribunal they could conduct the case from the train. No comment on the costs order is reported.
“He assured the panel he could conduct the case” — GB News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Barrister has been ordered to pay £7,000 for dialling into hearing from noisy train while overseas
Mixed Presents the costs order as a mishap, adding the sauna dismissal, the OpenAI link and the Tanwar comparison; the headline says 'noisy train'.

-
GB NewsR ·
Barrister fined £7k for dialling into UK hearing from train while living abroad in Germany
Mixed Similar account, with a 'fined' headline though the order is wasted costs, and stresses the barrister chose a second train over a quiet location.

- 1 Oct 09:39 First Daily MailR Barrister has been ordered to pay £7,000 for dialling into hearing from noisy train while overseas
- 1 Oct 09:54 +15m GB NewsR Barrister fined £7k for dialling into UK hearing from train while living abroad in Germany
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.