Skip to content
Bramble

UK

BBC permanently removes 'bare nails' article after criticism over 'white supremacist' quote

The BBC took down an article on the bare nails trend that quoted a beauty journalist linking it to white supremacist beauty standards. The BBC later said it was permanently removed for reporting criticism without enough context or challenge.

3 outlets · 1L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from The Guardian. Previously: “BBC removes 'bare nails' class and race article after online criticism”.

Image: Breitbart
Image: The Guardian
Image: Fox News

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

The BBC removed an article about the "bare nails" trend after criticism, mainly from right-leaning media in the US and UK. The Guardian says the piece first ran on 27 September and looked at a "viral craze" for bare rather than decorated nails. It quoted beauty journalist Kristina Rodulfo saying the trend promotes "blankness" and erasure of culture for black and brown communities, and that words like "elegant" or "tasteful" are often euphemisms that perpetuate white supremacist standards of beauty.

Critics quoted by Fox included Sex Matters' Helen Joyce, who objected that licence-fee payers fund such work; Breitbart cited Baroness Sharron Davies, who called it "divisive tosh". The Guardian adds that the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, Fox News and a Telegraph columnist also criticised it. An archived version first said the article was "removed pending editorial review", and the original URL later returned a 404 error page, according to Fox.

The BBC has since confirmed on its corrections register that the article was permanently removed on 29 September because it reported criticism of the trend without sufficient context or challenge. The Guardian says the BBC has not said who made the decision. Fox and the Guardian both place the episode against Donald Trump's legal action over a Panorama edit of his speech, which the BBC apologised for but says did not defame him.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Guardian reports the removal as a media-standards story, led by the BBC's own explanation and the editorial fallout, with the criticism attributed to US and UK outlets.
Emphasis
The BBC's corrections-register wording, the lack of challenge to the quotes, who might have made the decision, and the deputy director general's editorial role.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote the individual critics or social media reactions that Fox and Breitbart feature.
For example
“Bosses concluded there was no challenge in the piece to the quotes linking bare nails to white supremacy” — The Guardian
“Corporation says story did not meet editorial standards after it attracts criticism from US and UK media” — The Guardian

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Fox frames the removal as a capitulation to backlash and ties it to the Trump lawsuit; Breitbart's Nolte, in an opinion column, treats it as proof of woke excess at a discredited broadcaster.
Emphasis
Social media mockery and critic quotes, licence-fee funding, the Trump lawsuit and BBC leadership resignations, and (Breitbart) ridicule of the reporters and subject.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither carries the BBC's stated reason for permanent removal. Fox notes the BBC did not immediately respond; its article predates the BBC's explanation.
Charged language
“disgraced, far-left BBC”“retardery”“formerly respected and now disgraced BBC”
For example
“That’s all this is — the BBC inventing racism.” — Breitbart
“The article quickly drew widespread criticism for linking nail design to racism or class warfare.” — Fox News