BBC Studios expects one or two of its labels to bid in Doctor Who tender
BBC Studios' scripted head Jamie Hall says one, potentially two, of its production companies will bid to make Doctor Who. The BBC's tender closes on 2 October 2026.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Jamie Hall, who runs scripted at BBC Studios, told Deadline that "we've probably got one, potentially two companies" going for the tender to produce Doctor Who. DeadlineN “Hall said “we’ve probably got one, potentially two companies” going for the multi-million pound tender” Read at Deadline ↗ Radio TimesN “"probably got one, potentially two companies"” Read at Radio Times ↗ Hall said the show "should sit within the BBC and the whole group should reap the rewards of it". Radio TimesN “Doctor Who "should sit within the BBC and the whole group should reap the rewards of it"” Read at Radio Times ↗ A successful bid would bring the show back in house after two seasons made by Sony-owned Bad Wolf, starring Ncuti Gatwa. DeadlineN “which if successful would bring the show back in house following two seasons made by Sony-owned Bad Wolf, starring Ncuti Gatwa” Read at Deadline ↗
Hall would not name the companies but said he would "100%" be happy for more than one to enter; he added that he has not seen their proposals and wants the bid not to become a distraction, since the process is onerous and costly. DeadlineN “Hall wouldn’t reveal the names of the indies but said he would “100%” be happy for more than one to enter the race.”““I have to make sure that it doesn’t become a distraction from the day job,”” Read at Deadline ↗ BBC Studios has an in-house drama label that made Doctor Who before Bad Wolf, and owns indies including Clerkenwell Films, Lookout Point and House Productions. DeadlineN “BBC Studios runs an in-house drama label, which made Doctor Who before Bad Wolf” Read at Deadline ↗ Other interested companies include World Productions, owned by ITV Studios, and Electric Entertainment, while Quay Street, run by Nicola Schindler, has said it will not bid. DeadlineN “they will likely join Line of Duty producer World Productions” Read at Deadline ↗ Radio TimesN “multiple other companies have expressed interest, including Electric Entertainment and World Productions.”“her company, Quay Street, will not be entering a bid” Read at Radio Times ↗
The BBC seeks a multi-episode series, including specials, for transmission in 2028/29, with pitches due on 2 October 2026 and a decision in spring 2027. Radio TimesN “The deadline for pitches is 2 October 2026 and a decision will be made in spring 2027.” Read at Radio Times ↗ The tender asks for a "relevant, surprising, brave and inspiring" vision and is open to pitches using episodic writers rather than a showrunner model. DeadlineN “Notably, it said it is happy for indies to pitch a series using “episodic writers” rather than a “showrunner model,”” Read at Deadline ↗ Hall said he would like the show to return to the feel of the Matt Smith and David Tennant eras, using its time off screen to let audiences rediscover it. DeadlineN ““It will be off screen for two or three years and that gives the audience a great chance to have a break then rediscover, while also bringing a new audience.”” Read at Deadline ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets report Hall's comments as industry news on the race to produce Doctor Who. Deadline leads with the exclusive interview; Radio Times summarises it and adds tender details.
- Emphasis
- Deadline stresses BBC Studios' labels and the bringing of the show back in house; Radio Times stresses the tender's creative requirements, the deadline and the decision date.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Radio Times omits the named BBC Studios indies, the Bad Wolf and Disney+ context and the showrunner-model flexibility. Deadline omits the 2 October deadline, the spring 2027 decision and Quay Street's withdrawal.
- Charged language
- “throwing its hat in the ring”“beloved BBC sci-fi”
- For example
-
“At least one BBC Studios indie will be throwing its hat in the ring to become the next producer of Doctor Who” — Deadline
“The beloved BBC sci-fi recently released its invitation to tender” — Radio Times
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- Jamie Hall said BBC Studios has probably one, potentially two companies going for the tender.
- Hall said Doctor Who should sit within the BBC and the group should reap the rewards.
- The new series is targeted for transmission in 2028/29.
- World Productions is among interested bidders.
Jamie Hall person
Hall says BBC Studios expects one or two labels to bid and that Doctor Who should benefit the whole BBC group. He wants a return to the Tennant and Smith-era feel.
“Hall said “we’ve probably got one, potentially two companies” going for the multi-million pound tender” — Deadline
“he explained that he wanted to return to the feel of the show in the David Tennant and Matt Smith eras.” — Radio Times
BBC Studios organisation
BBC Studios CEO Tom Fussell said it would apply "with gusto"; the group runs an in-house drama label and owns several scripted indies.
“His comments followed BBC Studios CEO Tom Fussell recently saying BBC Studios would be applying “with gusto.”” — Deadline
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre2 articles
-
‘Doctor Who’: Multiple BBC Studios Labels Likely To Apply For Tender
Neutral Trade exclusive built on Hall's interview, placing the bids within the competition and Bad Wolf context.

-
Doctor Who competitive tender tipped to get multiple BBC Studios applications to take on series
Neutral Fan-oriented news report that relays Hall's comments and details the BBC's tender brief and timetable.

Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 30 Sep 10:30 First DeadlineN ‘Doctor Who’: Multiple BBC Studios Labels Likely To Apply For Tender
- 30 Sep 11:40 +1h 11m Radio TimesN Doctor Who competitive tender tipped to get multiple BBC Studios applications to take on series
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.