Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Belfast Court of Appeal overturns High Court ruling blocking A5 road upgrade

The Court of Appeal in Belfast overturned a 2025 High Court ruling that had stopped the A5 dual carriageway upgrade in its planned form, clearing the way for Northern Ireland's largest road project.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Irish Times
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The Court of Appeal in Belfast has quashed a High Court ruling that the delayed A5 road upgrade could not proceed in its current form, clearing the way for Northern Ireland's largest ever road project. Mixed · 2The cost is given as €2 billion by the Irish Times and £1.7 billion by GB News; the Irish Times describes a 93km stretch between Derry and Aughnacloy, Co Tyrone, while GB News says 58 miles. Left · 1The Department for Infrastructure approved the plans in 2024. In June last year a High Court judge, Judge McAlinden, ruled in favour of the Alternative A5 Alliance, a group of local residents and landowners, which claimed the upgrade would harm farmland and the environment.

Left · 1McAlinden found the scheme had not been shown to comply with the targets in the 2022 Climate Change Act, which requires Stormont departments to work towards net zero by 2050. He also found flaws in the consideration of human rights issues, because no time limit was imposed for construction, and in compliance with an Environmental Impact Assessment. He said further consultation was needed on estimating greenhouse gas emissions from induced traffic. Left · 1Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins appealed, and Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Minister Andrew Muir intervened in support. Their lawyers argued the High Court analysis was flawed. Mixed · 2Siobhan Keegan, the Lady Chief Justice, delivered the judgment. She said net zero by 2050 is not a prohibition on authorising a new road assessed, as far as possible, as consistent with emission reduction obligations, and that the High Court judge's fundamental error was failing to consider how the decision fitted within climate targets across Northern Ireland as a whole. GB News reports the court overturned the earlier ruling on all grounds.

Right · 1Keegan also criticised the departments' conduct of the litigation, saying their approach was "unsatisfactory and caused delay" and that the explanation the court received did not satisfy it that full thought had been given to the case at the appropriate stages. Left · 1The campaign group Enough is Enough, which represents families of people killed on the road, backed the appeal, arguing that rights to life and public safety must outrank any alleged breach of privacy. More than 50 people have been killed on the A5 since 2006, according to official figures. Right · 1Outside court, the group's Niall McKenna said he felt pride but that it was "not a time for celebration", because families' loved ones were already gone.

Right · 1Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the decision, saying the Irish Government supported the project and had guaranteed €600 million (£509 million) towards it, and that the road would bring road safety and economic benefits to the North-West.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Irish Times reports the ruling as a legal judgment, setting out the High Court's climate-law reasoning and the Court of Appeal's rebuttal.
Emphasis
Climate Change Act and net-zero legal reasoning, the grounds of the original challenge, and the victims' families' case.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote the court's criticism of the departments' handling of the litigation or the Taoiseach's reaction.
For example
““The legal obligations to achieve net zero by 2050 is not a prohibition upon the authorisation for a new road” — The Irish Times

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
GB News leads with the project going ahead 'despite protests', treating it as a win for the Government and quoting the campaigners' reaction.
Emphasis
The court's criticism of the departments, the Taoiseach's welcome and funding pledge, and the bereaved families' emotional response.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives little of the climate-law reasoning behind the High Court ruling and the appeal, and does not name the Alternative A5 Alliance.
Charged language
“victory for the Government”“No time for celebration”
For example
“overturned a previous ruling by the High Court on all grounds in a victory for the Government.” — GB News