Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Judgment due on legal challenge to ban of Drumcree Orange Order parade

Belfast High Court is expected to rule on a judicial review brought by an Orange Order member against Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Bryant's 9 October ban on the Drumcree parade in Portadown, and against the role of PSNI chief constable Jon Boutcher.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Evening Standard
Image: The Irish Times

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2A judgment is expected from Belfast High Court on a legal challenge to the decision by Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Bryant to ban the Drumcree Orange Order parade in Portadown. Mixed · 2Earlier this year the Parades Commission allowed the parade to complete its traditional route down the mainly nationalist Garvaghy Road for the first time in almost 30 years. Centre · 1The move drew large crowds to the road in opposition to the parade's return to a former flashpoint that saw serious disorder and violence in the 1990s.

Mixed · 2Police assessed that officers could not safely escort the parade along the Garvaghy Road while the crowds remained, and Orange men stayed on Drumcree Hill for almost two weeks, making several attempts to complete the parade by approaching the police line. Mixed · 2Bryant banned the parade on 9 October, after hosting talks with the two sides and being unable to find an agreed resolution. Centre · 1A member of the Orange Order sought a judicial review of Bryant's intervention and of the role of PSNI chief constable Jon Boutcher, in what is described as the latest in a series of legal challenges around the dispute.

Mixed · 2Last week Mr Justice Scoffield heard a challenge to the "legality of the decision-making route" to ban the parade, while counsel for Bryant argued he could have taken "no other decision". Left · 1The court also heard PSNI intelligence that dissident republicans may have mounted gun attacks on police had officers cleared a path for the parade.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Same PA-credited court report, led by the ban's background after failed talks, with links to related Irish Times pieces on public opinion and the Orange Order.
Emphasis
Context of public attitudes, via links to a poll showing more than 50% in NI back the ban.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not name the judge, Mr Justice Scoffield, and refers to the Secretary of State without the 'Sir' title.
Charged language
“visceral hatred”
For example
“NI Secretary banned parade after hosting talks with both sides and being unable to find a resolution” — The Irish Times
“More than 50% of people in NI back move to ban Orange Order parade at Drumcree” — The Irish Times

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Straight court-report framing, led by the judicial review naming Chief Constable Jon Boutcher alongside Chris Bryant.
Emphasis
The legal challenge and the Secretary of State's decision; text closely matches the Irish Times copy, which is credited to PA.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the polling on the ban or Catholic–Orange Order tensions that the Irish Times links to.
For example
“PSNI chief constable Jon Boutcher is also named in the judicial review at Belfast High Court.” — Evening Standard

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…