Skip to content
Bramble

World

Berlin SPD and Greens halt coalition talks with Left Party over antisemitism pledges

On 13 October the Berlin SPD and Greens interrupted exploratory coalition talks with the Left Party, which won the 20 September state election. They want to check whether last week's agreement on antisemitism still stands after the Left's lawmakers adopted their own text.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Straits Times
Image: Deutsche Welle

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2On the evening of Tuesday 13 October 2026, Berlin's Social Democrats (SPD) and Greens broke off exploratory talks on forming a state government with the Left Party. Mixed · 2In a joint statement, the Greens' Werner Graf and the SPD's Steffen Krach said they had to interrupt the negotiations to evaluate whether last week's agreement still stands, and that they expect the Left to make clear to what extent it takes the agreements seriously and intends to implement them. Mixed · 2The statement followed a constituent meeting of the Left's 44 members of the new Berlin parliament, which signed off on a different text from the one the three parties had agreed when opening talks.

Centre · 1According to Deutsche Welle, the Left's text says it stands by Israel's right to exist and by Palestine's right to exist, and it omits the joint text's description of Israel's right to exist as "non-negotiable" and its list of possible sanctions, up to expulsion from the party. Right · 1Reuters reported that the agreed measures would allow lawmakers accused of antisemitism to be expelled if a panel reached consensus, with experts called in if it did not, and that the Left had admitted lawmaker Vanessa Emde, who has caused controversy over her stance on Israel, to its new parliamentary group. Centre · 1Deutsche Welle also traced the breakdown to criticism over an organized crime figure who attended the Left's election-night party, and said the joint statement had covered distance from organized crime as well as antisemitism and Israel.

Mixed · 2The SPD and Greens did not close the door on the Left; Deutsche Welle said the exploratory talks could potentially restart. The Left did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. Mixed · 2The Left, led in Berlin by Elif Eralp, was the largest party in the 20 September election with 25.7%, followed by the CDU on 18.8%, the Greens just over 14% and the SPD just over 12%, so the three left-leaning parties would hold a slim majority together. Centre · 1The CDU argues that the SPD and Greens should negotiate with it instead, and Chancellor Friedrich Merz said allegations of impropriety against the Left cannot be "dismissed with a piece of paper." DW noted that an SPD–Greens–CDU alliance would have an even more fragile majority.

Right · 1Reuters described antisemitism and the Israel-Gaza conflict as a major fault line in German politics, with the SPD and Greens insisting on binding safeguards before talks with the Left.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Deutsche Welle, in a live roundup, explains the breakdown as a clash between the Left's own text on Israel and the joint statement, with added context on organized crime concerns, CDU and Merz reactions, and coalition arithmetic.
Emphasis
The differences between the two texts, the Left's internal criticism of the joint text, the door left open, and the seat and vote arithmetic.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention Vanessa Emde or the expulsion-panel mechanism described by Reuters.
Charged language
“unusually stern line”
For example
“They did leave the door open to potentially restart the exploratory talks, however” — Deutsche Welle
“But the text subsequently faced criticism from within the Left's own ranks.” — Deutsche Welle

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Straits Times runs a short Reuters wire report presenting the move as a pause to assess whether the antisemitism measures still stand, centred on the admission of controversial lawmaker Vanessa Emde.
Emphasis
Expulsion-panel mechanism, Emde's admission, the Left's lack of response, and antisemitism as a political fault line.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the Left's alternative text, the organized crime issue, or the CDU and Merz reactions.
Charged language
“far-left”“hard-left”
For example
“The decision comes after the Left admitted lawmaker Vanessa Emde, who has sparked controversy over her stance on Israel” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…