Boldmere Christmas festival cancelled after Sutton Coldfield council refuses funding
Organisers say the 15-year-old Boldmere Christmas festival will not run for a second year because Sutton Coldfield Town Council voted not to fund it. The council had not commented in the coverage.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2The Boldmere Christmas festival in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, will not go ahead for a second year in a row, according to its organiser, unless alternative funding is found. Daily ExpressR “A UK town will miss out on its Christmas market for the second year in a row unless funds to hold it can be urgently found.” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “An annual Christmas Market in the West Midlands has been scrapped for the second year running” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Paul Long, chairman of the not-for-profit Boldmere Futures CIC, announced this on Facebook, saying the town council had voted to refuse to fund the event for the second year running. Daily ExpressR “"the town council have voted to refuse to fund the Boldmere Christmas Festival for the second year running"” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “According to Mr Long, councillors voted against providing money for the celebration for the second year running.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Long wrote that the festival began 15 years ago under the then Boldmere Traders' Association and, without new funding, "this is a goodbye from the Christmas Festival". Daily ExpressR “After 15 years since it was started by the then Boldmere Traders' Association” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “then this is a goodbye from the Christmas Festival.” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2The festival costs £24,000 to run, and about £14,000 comes from stalls, the funfair and street food, with voluntary entrance donations helping cover core running costs. Daily ExpressR “The festival costs £24,000 to run, and Boldmere brings in £14,000 from stalls, the funfair, and street food” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “Voluntary entrance donations also contribute towards the organisation's core operating expenses.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Long said the group asked for money to cover the shortfall and core costs, expecting at least a partial grant, but "we weren't offered a penny"; according to him, the council's stated reason was that the festival was not financially sustainable. Daily ExpressR “we asked for funding that would cover the shortfall and our core running costs, expecting at least a partial grant, but we weren't offered a penny” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “The council justified withholding support by saying the festival lacked financial sustainability, according to the organiser.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Long also criticised the council, saying the high street relies on such events and that it gets only "a few dull flowers, wi-fi that is not needed, and the occasional visit from town rangers". Daily ExpressR “a few dull flowers, wi-fi that is not needed, and the occasional visit from town rangers” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “the authority offers little of value to the local high street” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2Residents and a business owner reacted on social media with disappointment: one called the decision "very disappointing and short-sighted", another joked "Scrooge is alive and well", and a business owner said they were "gutted". Daily ExpressR “Another joked: "Scrooge is alive and well".” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “One resident described the move as "very disappointing and short-sighted,"” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Both outlets said they had contacted the council for comment; no council response is reported, so its reasoning is known only through the organiser. Daily ExpressR “The Daily Express has contacted Sutton Coldfield Town Council for comment.” Read at Daily Express ↗ GB NewsR “GB News has contacted Sutton Coldfield Council for comment.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1GB News added that a Christmas night market in Faversham, Kent, will also not run this year, because scaffolding around the Guildhall, which is being restored, prevents it. GB NewsR “Scaffolding surrounding the historic Guildhall, which is undergoing major restoration, has forced organisers to scrap the festive evening event” Read at GB News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present a community loss caused by an unresponsive council, leading with the organiser's Facebook post and resident anger.
- Emphasis
- Long's criticism of the council, the £24,000 cost against £14,000 income, and resident reaction.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither reports a council response or its reasoning beyond the organiser's account. Neither gives the amount requested or details of the council vote.
- Charged language
- “Fury”“big blow for high street”“locals fume”“SECOND year in a row”
- For example
-
“Fury as UK Christmas market at risk of being cancelled again in 'big blow for high street'” — Daily Express
“Christmas market cancelled for SECOND year in a row as locals fume with council for refusing funding” — GB News
What every side reports
- The festival is organised by Boldmere Futures CIC and began 15 years ago.
- It costs £24,000 to run, with about £14,000 of income from stalls, the funfair and street food.
- The organiser says the town council voted not to fund it for the second year running.
- Neither outlet reports a council response.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the festival is definitely cancelled
- Right
- The Express says it is cancelled but also that it is 'at risk' unless funds are found; GB News says it has been scrapped, while noting the future 'hangs in the balance' without alternative funding.
Sutton Coldfield Town Council organisation
No comment from the council is reported; its reason, that the festival was not financially sustainable, comes only from the organiser.
“The Daily Express has contacted Sutton Coldfield Town Council for comment.” — Daily Express
“The council justified withholding support by saying the festival lacked financial sustainability, according to the organiser.” — GB News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Fury as UK Christmas market at risk of being cancelled again in 'big blow for high street'
Critical Frames the story as a possible cancellation and a council failing a high street, built on the organiser's quotes and resident reaction.

-
GB NewsR ·
Christmas market cancelled for SECOND year in a row as locals fume with council for refusing funding
Critical Reports the cancellation as settled and focuses on locals' anger at the council, adding a Faversham market as a comparison.

- 26 Oct 15:46 First Daily ExpressR Fury as UK Christmas market at risk of being cancelled again in 'big blow for high street'
- 28 Oct 12:14 +44h 29m GB NewsR Christmas market cancelled for SECOND year in a row as locals fume with council for refusing funding
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…