Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Boldmere Christmas festival cancelled after Sutton Coldfield council refuses funding

Organisers say the 15-year-old Boldmere Christmas festival will not run for a second year because Sutton Coldfield Town Council voted not to fund it. The council had not commented in the coverage.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Express
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2The Boldmere Christmas festival in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, will not go ahead for a second year in a row, according to its organiser, unless alternative funding is found. Right · 2Paul Long, chairman of the not-for-profit Boldmere Futures CIC, announced this on Facebook, saying the town council had voted to refuse to fund the event for the second year running. Right · 2Long wrote that the festival began 15 years ago under the then Boldmere Traders' Association and, without new funding, "this is a goodbye from the Christmas Festival".

Right · 2The festival costs £24,000 to run, and about £14,000 comes from stalls, the funfair and street food, with voluntary entrance donations helping cover core running costs. Right · 2Long said the group asked for money to cover the shortfall and core costs, expecting at least a partial grant, but "we weren't offered a penny"; according to him, the council's stated reason was that the festival was not financially sustainable. Right · 2Long also criticised the council, saying the high street relies on such events and that it gets only "a few dull flowers, wi-fi that is not needed, and the occasional visit from town rangers".

Right · 2Residents and a business owner reacted on social media with disappointment: one called the decision "very disappointing and short-sighted", another joked "Scrooge is alive and well", and a business owner said they were "gutted". Right · 2Both outlets said they had contacted the council for comment; no council response is reported, so its reasoning is known only through the organiser. Right · 1GB News added that a Christmas night market in Faversham, Kent, will also not run this year, because scaffolding around the Guildhall, which is being restored, prevents it.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets present a community loss caused by an unresponsive council, leading with the organiser's Facebook post and resident anger.
Emphasis
Long's criticism of the council, the £24,000 cost against £14,000 income, and resident reaction.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither reports a council response or its reasoning beyond the organiser's account. Neither gives the amount requested or details of the council vote.
Charged language
“Fury”“big blow for high street”“locals fume”“SECOND year in a row”
For example
“Fury as UK Christmas market at risk of being cancelled again in 'big blow for high street'” — Daily Express
“Christmas market cancelled for SECOND year in a row as locals fume with council for refusing funding” — GB News

Ask about this story

Loading…