Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Book 'Princes and Thieves' alleges Kushner took Emirati money; he denies it

Matthew Cole's book 'Princes and Thieves' alleges Jared Kushner managed or received Gulf money tied to Mohamed bin Zayed, relying largely on anonymous sources. Kushner's lawyers call the claims false and defamatory.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Reason
Image: Raw Story

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 1Investigative journalist Matthew Cole's new book, 'Princes and Thieves', accuses Emirati leader Mohamed bin Zayed (MBZ) of sending billions of dollars to mercenaries and political operators, including Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law. Right · 1Vanity Fair published an excerpt reporting that Dutch military intelligence hacked Kushner's phone in 2018 and found hundreds of millions of dollars in bank transfers connected to MBZ; the publication date was moved forward from October 27. Right · 1According to Cole's sources, MBZ and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman put a collective $2 billion into Emirati and Israeli bank accounts managed, but not technically owned, by Kushner, and parts of this fund allegedly went to Libyan warlord Khalifa Haftar, contractor Erik Prince and Felipe Vidal.

Left · 1In a later excerpt reported by The New Republic and relayed by Raw Story on 27 October, the book alleges the UAE paid Kushner to help push out Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, with $50 million routed through Azerbaijan to a Cyprus bank account a month after Tillerson's March 2018 firing. Mixed · 2The book also alleges that Qatari officials told Kushner they would help secure his property at 666 Fifth Avenue after Tillerson's exit, and that the Qatari royal family authorised and paid for the 2018 Brookfield investment, which Cole's three sources claim; it is unclear what Trump knew. Right · 1Kushner's lawyers called the allegations 'incredible and false', said he never accessed foreign accounts and followed all rules, denied any relationship with Haftar, Prince or Vidal apart from one meeting with Prince, and said any suggestion of a quid pro quo with Qatar is false and defamatory.

Left · 1Kushner has called earlier claims 'completely insane, categorically false', his lawyers called an excerpt 'defamatory per se', and his attorney denied he sought or accepted money from MBZ or held a Cyprus account. Right · 1Reason notes that the most explosive claims rest on anonymous sources, so it comes down to Cole's word against Kushner's; it also reports that Israeli negotiator Gershon Baskin questioned the claim because the Bank of Israel does not offer private banking, which the book answers by saying the money sat in what appeared to be a government account. Right · 1Cole says in the epilogue that he considered the lawyers' responses and remains confident his reporting is accurate; Reason also notes the US government regards the May 2019 tanker attack as genuinely Iranian, not an Emirati false flag.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Leads with the new, most pointed allegation: a $50M foreign payoff to Kushner to oust Rex Tillerson, via The New Republic.
Emphasis
The payment route, Tillerson's removal and Qatar's offer on 666 Fifth Avenue; denials come after the allegations.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives little on the book's documentary support, the Baskin objection or the lack of verification.
Charged language
“Explosive”“foreign payoff”
For example
“Explosive book accuses Kushner of taking $50M foreign payoff to oust Trump Cabinet member” — Raw Story

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Sceptical, explanatory review that weighs documented background against anonymous-source claims.
Emphasis
Which claims are corroborated, Kushner's lawyers' denials, the Baskin critique and the sourcing.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the Tillerson and $50M Cyprus allegation.
Charged language
“explosive claims”“slush fund”
For example
“Cole's reporting combines well-documented connections with secondhand accounts from anonymous sources.” — Reason

Ask about this story

Loading…