Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Burnham wants welfare bill cut "as soon as we possibly can" but gives no timetable

Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the government is working to cut the welfare bill quickly but rejected "crude cuts", and did not commit to a reduction before the next election. Two reviews due in November are expected to set out more detail.

3 outlets · 1L · 2C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Mirror
Image: BBC News
Image: Anadolu Agency

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Prime Minister Andy Burnham said on Thursday 29 October that the government wants to get the welfare bill down "as quickly as possible" and is "working flat out to that end". Mixed · 2Asked by reporters whether benefit spending would fall before the next general election, due by 2029, Burnham gave no timetable; the BBC reported that he was unable to guarantee a cut before then. Mixed · 2Pressed again, he said: "We're working hard to cut the welfare bill as soon as we possibly can. But we're doing it in a way that supports people into work." He added that "crude cuts" would leave people in crisis and mean more public money spent elsewhere.

Mixed · 2He named the publication of the long-awaited report by former Labour minister Alan Milburn on young people not in education, employment or training (Neets) as the "big next priority", and said there was "no delay" in helping people off benefits and into work. Mixed · 2The remarks followed Wednesday's Budget, in which Chancellor John Healey deferred major welfare reform until two reviews report in November: Milburn's on Neets and a review of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) by DWP minister Sir Stephen Timms. Mixed · 2Both reviews were set up by former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after his 2025 attempt to restrict eligibility for some health-related benefits met a revolt by Labour MPs and was abandoned.

Mixed · 2The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts welfare spending to rise by £19bn this year to £353bn and to reach £431bn in 2031/32, driven mainly by health-related benefits and pensioner spending. Centre · 1The BBC said the 2031/32 figure includes £209.8bn on pensioners, £110.7bn on universal credit and legacy equivalents, and £69.6bn on disability benefits such as PIP. Centre · 1The BBC reported that the Treasury disputed that Healey had promised a cut before the election. On Radio 4's Today programme he had said "there will be a reduction in the benefits bill, we'll do that in a Labour way"; Treasury sources objected to this being read as a pledge, and Downing Street said it was "not setting an arbitrary target or timetable".

Centre · 1The prime minister's spokesman would not say whether the aim meant spending below its current level or rising more slowly than projected. Left · 1Healey told Good Morning Britain the government would be "tough" on young people who do not take up offers of support, while giving them "real support and advice". Centre · 1Opponents criticised the lack of detail: the Conservatives accused Labour of being "addicted to welfare", and Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said it "looks like foot in mouth syndrome is spreading". Former Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane, who has advised Burnham, said a plan showing "greater restraint" on benefits would "play spectacularly well" with financial markets.

Centre · 1The government has also pledged to reform the state pension triple lock from 2030.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Leads on Burnham's insistence that the government is working 'flat out' to curb benefit spending while rejecting 'crude cuts', presenting a reasoned work-first approach.
Emphasis
Burnham's quotes, the Chancellor's 'tough' but supportive stance on Neets, and Starmer's 2025 retreat on PIP.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report the Treasury and Downing Street dispute over Healey's remarks, the opposition criticism, or the spending breakdown.
Charged language
“crude cuts”“working flat out”
For example
“Andy Burnham has insisted the government is working flat out to curb spending on benefits - but dismissed "crude cuts" that would leave people in crisis.” — Daily Mirror

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Leads on Burnham's failure to give a timetable or guarantee a cut before the election, amid a row over what Healey had promised.
Emphasis
Treasury and Downing Street walking back Healey's remarks, opposition criticism from the Conservatives and Badenoch, Haldane's market view, and the OBR spending breakdown.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives less space to Healey's remarks on being tough on young people who decline support.
Charged language
“foot in mouth syndrome”“addicted to welfare”
For example
“The prime minister did not outline a timetable, while opponents questioned the Budget's lack of detail on welfare reform.” — BBC News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…