Skip to content
Bramble

US

California billionaire tax, Proposition 40, faces record opposition spending a week before vote

Californians vote on 3 November on Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' assets, after opponents raised over $300m against $32m for supporters. Coverage differs on the polls, the economic effects and the split among Democrats.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Al Jazeera
Image: Washington Examiner

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Californians vote on 3 November on Proposition 40, a one-time 5 percent tax on the assets of the state's billionaires. Left · 1Al Jazeera reports that tech billionaires, including Sergey Brin, Tony Xu, Patrick Collison, Chris Larsen, John Doerr, Michael Moritz and Vinod Khosla, have donated more than $300m to oppose the tax, while supporters have raised $32m. Sonoma State's David McCuan says this makes it the most expensive ballot measure ever. Left · 1Brian Galle, a UC Berkeley professor who helped write the measure, said a flyer he received claimed the tax could fall on anyone, including their retirement savings. A volunteer for Patriotic Millionaires, which supports the tax, said voters often tell her it has secret provisions to tax everyone, which she said is "not entirely true".

Mixed · 2Democrats are split over the proposition. The state party has endorsed the tax, but Governor Gavin Newsom, gubernatorial nominee Xavier Becerra and former congresswoman Katie Porter oppose it, and Newsom has called it "poorly written". Mixed · 2Unions are divided as well. The Washington Examiner says AFSCME, the Teamsters and the California Labor Federation support the tax, the California Teachers Association, California Medical Association and Planned Parenthood oppose it, and statewide SEIU has taken no position, although SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West put it on the ballot. Al Jazeera quotes an SEIU health workers union official saying they are confident of winning, and that 3,000 volunteers have been canvassing. Mixed · 2Opponents have also backed two other measures, which the Examiner identifies as Propositions 41 and 42. One bars new state taxes on personal property or imposed retroactively, and the other requires auditors to review tax measures before a vote. If either passes with more votes than Proposition 40, it could void the billionaire tax even if that passes.

Mixed · 2Polling is mixed. A Public Policy Institute of California poll found a small margin of support for the tax, and also for the two measures opposing it. The Washington Examiner cites a California Post/McLaughlin poll with the tax trailing 32.5% to 52.6% and a Citrin/Politico poll with it ahead 46% to 43%. Right · 1The Examiner's opinion pieces argue that the tax would hurt the state. One cites a National Bureau of Economic Research paper by Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh, which found that 85 percent of simulated outcomes gave a negative net present value of state revenues (negative $38.9 billion in its central estimate) because of billionaire departures. It also says the tax would raise an estimated $30 billion. Mixed · 2The Examiner says several wealthy people have left California since the measure was announced, citing a Stanford finding of seven billionaires leaving with some $540 billion in taxable income. Al Jazeera reports that Mark Zuckerberg, who has not donated against the tax, told Meta's board he would buy a home outside California, and that Meta created a new share class he could use to pay the tax.

Left · 1Al Jazeera frames the money as a democratic fairness problem, quoting Galle and UC Berkeley's Francesco Trebbi on the influence of wealth after Citizens United. Pollster Mark Baldassare noted that only about a third of citizen initiatives pass. McCuan called the contest a proxy fight between progressives and moderates ahead of the 2028 presidential race.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Al Jazeera presents the campaign as a lopsided contest in which tech billionaires' spending, misinformation and Democratic infighting threaten a measure backed by supporters.
Emphasis
The $300m versus $32m funding gap, misleading flyers and ads, Citizens United, and the progressive-moderate split in the Democratic Party.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives little on projections that the tax could cost the state revenue through departures, or on the individual poll results the Examiner cites.
Charged language
“precarious road from rich opposition”“Alice in Wonderland alternate reality”
For example
“The billionaire fundraising has far outstripped that of the supporters, who only raised $32m.” — Al Jazeera
““The irony is that Prop 40 [the billionaire tax proposal] is meant to make democracy more equal, but the billionaires are using their money to avoid that,”” — Al Jazeera

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Washington Examiner presents the tax as destructive and likely to fail, stressing Democratic divisions, billionaire departures and projected revenue losses; two of its pieces are opinion.
Emphasis
The NBER revenue estimate, departures of wealthy residents, falling revenue projections, polling deficits and property rights.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the $300m campaign spending or the gap with supporters' funding.
Charged language
“destructive wealth tax”“confiscation”“soak the rich and sink the state”“loot”
For example
“California Democrats have disagreed with each other for the first time on a major issue, and they have still managed to damage the state’s future as a result.” — Washington Examiner
“which means that using the state to loot isn’t just wrong; it’s destructive.” — Washington Examiner

Ask about this story

Loading…