California billionaire tax, Proposition 40, faces record opposition spending a week before vote
Californians vote on 3 November on Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' assets, after opponents raised over $300m against $32m for supporters. Coverage differs on the polls, the economic effects and the split among Democrats.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2Californians vote on 3 November on Proposition 40, a one-time 5 percent tax on the assets of the state's billionaires. Al JazeeraLC “whether to impose the one-time tax of 5 percent on the assets of the state’s billionaires” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Washington ExaminerR “California’s “one-time” confiscation of 5% of billionaires’ wealth is polling underwater” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Left · 1Al Jazeera reports that tech billionaires, including Sergey Brin, Tony Xu, Patrick Collison, Chris Larsen, John Doerr, Michael Moritz and Vinod Khosla, have donated more than $300m to oppose the tax, while supporters have raised $32m. Sonoma State's David McCuan says this makes it the most expensive ballot measure ever. Al JazeeraLC “have donated more than $300m to block the additional tax on their assets”“The billionaire fundraising has far outstripped that of the supporters, who only raised $32m.”“Spending by the billionaires to oppose the tax has made this the most expensive ballot measure ever” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Left · 1Brian Galle, a UC Berkeley professor who helped write the measure, said a flyer he received claimed the tax could fall on anyone, including their retirement savings. A volunteer for Patriotic Millionaires, which supports the tax, said voters often tell her it has secret provisions to tax everyone, which she said is "not entirely true". Al JazeeraLC “including that the tax can be on anyone and even on their retirement savings”““They often tell me it has secret provisions allowing everyone to be taxed, which is not entirely true,” she said.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Mixed · 2Democrats are split over the proposition. The state party has endorsed the tax, but Governor Gavin Newsom, gubernatorial nominee Xavier Becerra and former congresswoman Katie Porter oppose it, and Newsom has called it "poorly written". Al JazeeraLC “California Governor Gavin Newsom has opposed it, as has Xavier Becerra” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Washington ExaminerR “California’s Democratic nominee for governor, Xavier Becerra, also opposes Proposition 40, but the California Democratic Party voted to endorse it.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Unions are divided as well. The Washington Examiner says AFSCME, the Teamsters and the California Labor Federation support the tax, the California Teachers Association, California Medical Association and Planned Parenthood oppose it, and statewide SEIU has taken no position, although SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West put it on the ballot. Al Jazeera quotes an SEIU health workers union official saying they are confident of winning, and that 3,000 volunteers have been canvassing. Washington ExaminerR “AFSCME, the Teamsters, and the California Labor Federation supporting the wealth tax, while the California Teachers Association opposes it”“the statewide SEIU has declined to take a position” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Al JazeeraLC “3,000 volunteers have spread out to knock on doors” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Mixed · 2Opponents have also backed two other measures, which the Examiner identifies as Propositions 41 and 42. One bars new state taxes on personal property or imposed retroactively, and the other requires auditors to review tax measures before a vote. If either passes with more votes than Proposition 40, it could void the billionaire tax even if that passes. Al JazeeraLC “a ballot measure that prohibits any new state taxes based on personal property or imposed retroactively” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Washington ExaminerR “Proposition 40 could pass and still be voided by Propositions 41 and 42 if either one passes with more support than Proposition 40.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Mixed · 2Polling is mixed. A Public Policy Institute of California poll found a small margin of support for the tax, and also for the two measures opposing it. The Washington Examiner cites a California Post/McLaughlin poll with the tax trailing 32.5% to 52.6% and a Citrin/Politico poll with it ahead 46% to 43%. Al JazeeraLC “Voters support the tax by a small margin, but also the two measures that oppose it, according to a recent poll by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC).” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Washington ExaminerR “trailing among voters, 32.5% to 52.6%, while a Citrin/Politico poll showed the proposition leading, 46%-43%” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1The Examiner's opinion pieces argue that the tax would hurt the state. One cites a National Bureau of Economic Research paper by Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh, which found that 85 percent of simulated outcomes gave a negative net present value of state revenues (negative $38.9 billion in its central estimate) because of billionaire departures. It also says the tax would raise an estimated $30 billion. Washington ExaminerR ““85 percent of plausible outcomes produce a negative net present value of state revenues.””“yielding a net present value of negative $38.9 billion.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2The Examiner says several wealthy people have left California since the measure was announced, citing a Stanford finding of seven billionaires leaving with some $540 billion in taxable income. Al Jazeera reports that Mark Zuckerberg, who has not donated against the tax, told Meta's board he would buy a home outside California, and that Meta created a new share class he could use to pay the tax. Washington ExaminerR “seven billionaires have already moved out of the state, taking with them some $540 billion in taxable income” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Al JazeeraLC “he would buy a home outside California to avoid paying the tax” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Left · 1Al Jazeera frames the money as a democratic fairness problem, quoting Galle and UC Berkeley's Francesco Trebbi on the influence of wealth after Citizens United. Pollster Mark Baldassare noted that only about a third of citizen initiatives pass. McCuan called the contest a proxy fight between progressives and moderates ahead of the 2028 presidential race. Al JazeeraLC ““It’s Sergey Brin v millions of Californians. This leads people to lose trust in the system ””““Only about a third of such citizen initiatives pass. So the burden is on the yes side,””““This is a broader proxy test between the party’s progressives and moderates.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Al Jazeera presents the campaign as a lopsided contest in which tech billionaires' spending, misinformation and Democratic infighting threaten a measure backed by supporters.
- Emphasis
- The $300m versus $32m funding gap, misleading flyers and ads, Citizens United, and the progressive-moderate split in the Democratic Party.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives little on projections that the tax could cost the state revenue through departures, or on the individual poll results the Examiner cites.
- Charged language
- “precarious road from rich opposition”“Alice in Wonderland alternate reality”
- For example
-
“The billionaire fundraising has far outstripped that of the supporters, who only raised $32m.” — Al Jazeera
““The irony is that Prop 40 [the billionaire tax proposal] is meant to make democracy more equal, but the billionaires are using their money to avoid that,”” — Al Jazeera
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- The Washington Examiner presents the tax as destructive and likely to fail, stressing Democratic divisions, billionaire departures and projected revenue losses; two of its pieces are opinion.
- Emphasis
- The NBER revenue estimate, departures of wealthy residents, falling revenue projections, polling deficits and property rights.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the $300m campaign spending or the gap with supporters' funding.
- Charged language
- “destructive wealth tax”“confiscation”“soak the rich and sink the state”“loot”
- For example
-
“California Democrats have disagreed with each other for the first time on a major issue, and they have still managed to damage the state’s future as a result.” — Washington Examiner
“which means that using the state to loot isn’t just wrong; it’s destructive.” — Washington Examiner
What every side reports
- The vote on Proposition 40 is on 3 November, and it would impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires' wealth.
- Governor Newsom and gubernatorial nominee Xavier Becerra oppose the measure, while the California Democratic Party endorsed it.
- Propositions opposing Proposition 40 could void it if they pass with more votes.
- Democrats and unions are divided over the measure.
Where accounts differ
-
State of the polls
- Left
- Al Jazeera says a PPIC poll shows a small margin of support, though opposition may have eroded it and the burden is on the yes side.
- Right
- The Washington Examiner says the proposition is on pace to lose, citing a poll with it trailing 32.5% to 52.6% and another with it at 46%-43%, short of a majority.
-
Economic effect of the tax
- Left
- Al Jazeera says the tax's wealthy opponents are spending heavily and spreading misinformation, and quotes supporters' claims that voters see through the ads.
- Right
- The Examiner argues it would reduce state revenue, cites the NBER paper, and says billionaires have already left.
-
Who is outspent and why it matters
- Left
- Al Jazeera stresses the $300m vs $32m gap as distorting democracy.
- Right
- The Examiner does not discuss the spending gap and focuses on Democratic divisions and capital flight.
California Proposition 40 (billionaire tax) other
Supporters including SEIU health workers and Ro Khanna say it makes the richest pay and that voters see through the opposition ads. Opponents including Newsom call it poorly written and argue it would drive out billionaires.
““We are feeling confident that we will have the votes. When voters see that billionaires are funding the ads, they see through them.”” — Al Jazeera
“Gov. Gavin Newsom opposes Proposition 40, recognizing that it will lead (and, in fact, already has led) to billionaires fleeing the state” — Washington Examiner
National Bureau of Economic Research organisation
A paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, by Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh, estimated that the tax would likely reduce California's net revenue; the Examiner cites it.
“A new paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research finds that the proposed levy, a one-time 5% tax on billionaires’ wealth, would likely leave California with less revenue.” — Washington Examiner
Middle East1 outlet
Al Jazeera, reporting from San Francisco, treats the campaign as a story about money in politics and Democratic divisions.
“Spending by the billionaires to oppose the tax has made this the most expensive ballot measure ever” — Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera
North America1 outlet
The Washington Examiner, a US outlet, treats it as a domestic fight over taxes and Democratic politics, in opinion pieces.
“The California wealth tax ballot proposition is dividing Democrats and their activists with a week left until the election” — Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
Left1 article
-
California’s billionaire tax faces a precarious road from rich opposition
Sympathetic Reports the opposition spending and misinformation as a threat to the tax and to democratic fairness, with backers' and academics' voices.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
California Democrats still butting heads over destructive wealth tax
Critical Opinion column portraying the measure as divisive and economically damaging, with Democrats split and the tax trailing in one poll.

-
Washington ExaminerR · · Opinion
California’s Proposition 40 would soak the rich and sink the state
Alarmist Opinion piece arguing the tax will backfire, citing the NBER paper and departures, and defending property rights.

- 26 Oct 09:08 First Al JazeeraLC California’s billionaire tax faces a precarious road from rich opposition
- 26 Oct 18:14 +9h 5m Washington ExaminerR California Democrats still butting heads over destructive wealth tax
- 26 Oct 18:14 +9h 6m Washington ExaminerR California’s Proposition 40 would soak the rich and sink the state Opinion
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…