Skip to content
Bramble

World

CENTCOM rejects Iran's claim of intimidating civilian crews over radio

US Central Command called false an Iranian complaint to the IMO that US forces misuse an emergency radio channel to pressure civilian crews. It defended its months-long blockade of Iran.

2 outlets · 0L · 2C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Anadolu Agency
Image: Gulf News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Centre · 2US Central Command (CENTCOM) said on Wednesday 14 October that an Iranian claim that American forces were using threatening language against Iranian sailors was false. Centre · 1Iran filed a formal protest with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) the previous week, saying US forces were misusing an emergency channel as "an instrument of military intimidation and psychological pressure against civilian crews." Centre · 1According to Gulf News, Iran's ambassador to the IMO said US forces were using VHF Channel 16, the international distress and safety frequency, to address Iranian crews in Persian with "threatening, abusive, and provocative language", and that in some cases the transmissions urged crews to abandon their vessels.

Centre · 1Iran asked the IMO to circulate its protest and take action, arguing that no armed conflict or blockade justifies turning a protected safety channel into an instrument of intimidation. Centre · 2In a statement on X, CENTCOM said the US blockade of Iran had been in place for months and was "professionally communicated". Centre · 2CENTCOM also accused Iran of being "the only country attacking civilian mariners transiting regional waters" and said commercial traffic continues to flow through the Strait of Hormuz with coordinated protection from US forces and regional partners.

Centre · 2Both outlets note that the CENTCOM statement gave no details or evidence on the specific allegations; Gulf News adds that it did not address the radio transmissions cited in Iran's complaint. Centre · 1Gulf News reported that attacks on commercial vessels near the Strait of Hormuz have intensified, with maritime authorities reporting projectiles striking a tanker and a container ship north of the Musandam Peninsula on 13 October, after six incidents two days earlier.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets report the exchange as a US rebuttal of an Iranian IMO complaint, set against Hormuz shipping tension, with both sides' claims attributed.
Emphasis
CENTCOM's rejection and its blockade defence; Gulf News adds the Channel 16 detail, Iran's request to the IMO and recent ship attacks.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither gives evidence for either side's claims or names the Iranian ambassador.
For example
“The statement comes as Iran and the US remain at odds about navigation through the strategic strait amid heightened maritime tensions.” — Anadolu Agency
“The dispute comes as attacks on commercial vessels near the Strait of Hormuz have intensified.” — Gulf News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…