Colorado sidewalk counselor appeals ruling upholding state's 8-foot 'bubble law'
Pro-life sidewalk counselor Wendy Faustin is challenging Colorado's "bubble law" at the 10th Circuit after a federal judge rejected her case. She says it restricts her speech, and the state attorney general's office has no comment beyond its filings.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Wendy Faustin, a pro-life sidewalk counselor who offers abortion alternatives outside clinics in Colorado, is challenging the state's so-called "bubble law", which she says turns what she considers a compassionate conversation into a legal risk. Fox NewsR “A Colorado woman who offers abortion alternatives outside clinics is battling a state law that prohibits her from approaching someone too closely” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “Wendy Faustin, a pro-life sidewalk counselor challenging Colorado’s so-called “bubble law,”” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1Colorado state law and a Denver municipal ordinance prohibit people from knowingly approaching within eight feet of another person without their consent to distribute literature or engage in protest, education or counseling within 100 feet of a health care facility entrance, including abortion clinics. Fox NewsR “prohibit individuals from knowingly approaching within eight feet of another person without their consent to distribute literature or engage in protest, education or counseling within 100 feet of a health care facility entrance” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 2Violations are classified as a petty offense, which carries a fine or possibly a short jail sentence. Fox NewsR “Violations are classified as a petty offense, which carries with it a fine or even a possible short jail sentence.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “Violations are classified as a petty offense, which carries with it a fine or even a possible short jail sentence.” Read at New York Post ↗
Right · 2Faustin says the rule stops her from quietly offering women information about pregnancy resource centers, adoption agencies and other alternatives to abortion, and forces her to speak from a distance where others may overhear. Fox NewsR “the restrictions prevent her from quietly offering women information about pregnancy resource centers, adoption agencies and other alternatives to abortion” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “potentially allowing others to overhear conversations she would prefer to keep private” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1A federal judge rejected her challenge to the law last July, and the case is now on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. Fox NewsR “Last July, a federal judge rejected her challenge to the Colorado law. Her case is currently on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 2The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Colorado's 1993 law in its 2000 decision in Hill v. Colorado, ruling that the restrictions did not violate the First Amendment. Fox NewsR “The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Colorado's 1993 law in its 2000 decision in Hill v. Colorado, ruling that the restrictions did not violate the First Amendment.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Colorado’s 1993 law in its 2000 decision in Hill v. Colorado” Read at New York Post ↗
Right · 2Her attorney, Roger Byron of First Liberty Institute, argues the dispute reaches beyond abortion, saying such laws would be struck down if they restricted anti-war protesters or striking union workers, and that Hill v. Colorado makes pro-life sidewalk counselors "second-class citizens". Fox NewsR “"These laws would be struck down immediately if they restricted anti-war protesters or union workers on strike outside of their employer's facility," Byron said.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “make sidewalk counselors, because of their pro-life message, second-class citizens.” Read at New York Post ↗ Right · 1Byron said he expects the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court whichever way the 10th Circuit rules. Fox NewsR “"I suspect either way, this case is going to end up in front of the U.S. Supreme Court," Byron said.” Read at Fox News ↗ Right · 2Fox News Digital asked the Colorado attorney general's office for comment, and a spokesperson said it has no comment beyond its filings, so the state's arguments are not set out in the coverage. Fox NewsR “a spokesperson said that the office has no comment beyond its filings.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “a spokesperson said that the office has no comment beyond its filings.” Read at New York Post ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Sympathetic profile of Faustin as a compassionate counselor facing legal risk, led by her and her attorney's First Amendment arguments. The New York Post article is bylined "Fox News" and carries the same text as the Fox News piece, so it is one report rather than two independent ones.
- Emphasis
- Jail risk, free speech, and the claim of unequal treatment of pro-life speech compared with other protest.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No opposing voices such as clinic staff, patients or supporters of the law, no explanation of the state's rationale for protecting patients, and no detail of the federal judge's reasoning.
- Charged language
- “second-class citizens”“oppressive one for pro-life sidewalk counselors”
- For example
-
“It literally creates two First Amendments. An oppressive one for pro-life sidewalk counselors, and the real one, the good one for everybody else.” — Fox News
“Pro-life advocate risks jail for offering abortion alternatives outside Colorado clinics” — New York Post
What every side reports
- Faustin is challenging Colorado's 8-foot, 100-foot buffer law.
- A federal judge rejected her challenge last July and the appeal is at the 10th Circuit.
- Hill v. Colorado (2000) upheld the law.
- The Colorado attorney general's office has no comment beyond its filings.
Wendy Faustin person
Says the law bars her from approaching within 8 feet to give alternative information, wants to be able to walk up and offer help, and says she gives only information on where to get help and on fetal development.
“"I would rather be able to just walk up to somebody, offer them alternative information, places where they can get help," she said.” — Fox News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Colorado pro-life sidewalk counselor battles state 'bubble law' she says curtails First Amendment
Sympathetic Presents Faustin's and her attorney's First Amendment case at length, with the state's response limited to a no-comment line.

-
Pro-life advocate risks jail for offering abortion alternatives outside Colorado clinics
Sympathetic Republishes the Fox News text under a headline stressing that she risks jail.

- 26 Oct 19:07 First Fox NewsR Colorado pro-life sidewalk counselor battles state 'bubble law' she says curtails First Amendment
- 26 Oct 22:45 +3h 39m New York PostR Pro-life advocate risks jail for offering abortion alternatives outside Colorado clinics
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…