Skip to content
Bramble

US

Colorado sidewalk counselor appeals ruling upholding state's 8-foot 'bubble law'

Pro-life sidewalk counselor Wendy Faustin is challenging Colorado's "bubble law" at the 10th Circuit after a federal judge rejected her case. She says it restricts her speech, and the state attorney general's office has no comment beyond its filings.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Fox News
Image: New York Post

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2Wendy Faustin, a pro-life sidewalk counselor who offers abortion alternatives outside clinics in Colorado, is challenging the state's so-called "bubble law", which she says turns what she considers a compassionate conversation into a legal risk. Right · 1Colorado state law and a Denver municipal ordinance prohibit people from knowingly approaching within eight feet of another person without their consent to distribute literature or engage in protest, education or counseling within 100 feet of a health care facility entrance, including abortion clinics. Right · 2Violations are classified as a petty offense, which carries a fine or possibly a short jail sentence.

Right · 2Faustin says the rule stops her from quietly offering women information about pregnancy resource centers, adoption agencies and other alternatives to abortion, and forces her to speak from a distance where others may overhear. Right · 1A federal judge rejected her challenge to the law last July, and the case is now on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. Right · 2The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Colorado's 1993 law in its 2000 decision in Hill v. Colorado, ruling that the restrictions did not violate the First Amendment.

Right · 2Her attorney, Roger Byron of First Liberty Institute, argues the dispute reaches beyond abortion, saying such laws would be struck down if they restricted anti-war protesters or striking union workers, and that Hill v. Colorado makes pro-life sidewalk counselors "second-class citizens". Right · 1Byron said he expects the case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court whichever way the 10th Circuit rules. Right · 2Fox News Digital asked the Colorado attorney general's office for comment, and a spokesperson said it has no comment beyond its filings, so the state's arguments are not set out in the coverage.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Sympathetic profile of Faustin as a compassionate counselor facing legal risk, led by her and her attorney's First Amendment arguments. The New York Post article is bylined "Fox News" and carries the same text as the Fox News piece, so it is one report rather than two independent ones.
Emphasis
Jail risk, free speech, and the claim of unequal treatment of pro-life speech compared with other protest.
Leaves out or plays down
No opposing voices such as clinic staff, patients or supporters of the law, no explanation of the state's rationale for protecting patients, and no detail of the federal judge's reasoning.
Charged language
“second-class citizens”“oppressive one for pro-life sidewalk counselors”
For example
“It literally creates two First Amendments. An oppressive one for pro-life sidewalk counselors, and the real one, the good one for everybody else.” — Fox News
“Pro-life advocate risks jail for offering abortion alternatives outside Colorado clinics” — New York Post

Ask about this story

Loading…