Right-leaning commentators assess DOGE's legacy: bureaucracy outlasted it, or it shrank it
Two right-leaning opinion pieces on 16 October 2026 reach different verdicts on Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency: one says entrenched bureaucracy ran out the clock on it, the other says it cut the federal workforce substantially.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Two opinion pieces published on 16 October 2026 by right-leaning outlets look back at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk during his time as a special government employee under President Trump. Washington ExaminerR “Give the Department of Government Efficiency its due.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Hot AirR “after spending his time as a special government employee, most observers deemed his tenure a failure.” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1In the Washington Examiner, David Richardson credits DOGE with taking on the federal bureaucracy, zeroing in on "a few particularly egregious federal offices" and showing there is an appetite for a smaller, cheaper federal government. Washington ExaminerR “DOGE identified the problem, zeroed in on a few particularly egregious federal offices, and proved there is an appetite for a smaller, cheaper federal government.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Right · 1Richardson quotes Machiavelli's The Prince, that "the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order", and his headline argues that "the swamp" ran out the clock on Musk. Washington ExaminerR “The reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order, and only lukewarm defenders in all those who would profit by the new.”“Outwitting DOGE: How ‘the swamp’ ran out the clock on Elon Musk” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1On Hot Air, David Strom says most observers deemed Musk's tenure a failure but argues that verdict was premature, drawing on a City Journal article by Judge Glock. Hot AirR “Yet...perhaps the declarations of Elon's failure were premature.”“Judge Glock in City Journal argues that disappointment with DOGE misses the fundamental changes it made to the federal government” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1Citing Glock, Strom says the civil service peaked at more than 2.3 million employees before Trump took office and has since shrunk by more than 270,000, a 12 percent drop he describes as the fastest decline in federal employment since the end of World War II. Hot AirR “Since then, it has shrunk by more than 270,000 people, a 12 percent drop—the fastest decline in federal employment since the end of World War II.” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1The piece says the largest cut by job type was more than 43,000 general administration, management and "program analysis" positions, with general attorneys, HR officials, clerks and general business managers each losing roughly 7,000 workers. Hot AirR “cut more than 43,000 general administration, management, and “program analysis” positions”“each losing roughly 7,000 workers” Read at Hot Air ↗
Right · 1By department, it says the former Department of Defense, now the Department of War, has over 85,000 fewer employees than at Trump's inauguration, and the Department of Veterans Affairs has 27,000 fewer; it says every agency took cuts, though Health and Human Services saw larger proportional shrinkage. Hot AirR “The department has over 85,000 fewer employees than it did at Trump’s inauguration, down more than 10 percent.”“has 27,000 fewer employees today than it did pre-inauguration” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1The Hot Air piece concedes that DOGE overpromised on total savings and says the criticism is fair; it also says DOGE made only modest reductions in contracting and a handful of grant cuts, and that the press focused on disputing its claims. Hot AirR “One area where Elon and company overpromised and under-delivered was in total savings, and the criticism is fair.”“DOGE made only modest reductions in government contracting and a handful of cuts to government grants” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1Strom says whether the reductions last depends on who succeeds Trump, noting the federal government "has more inertia than a Ford-Class carrier", and concludes DOGE accomplished at least some of what was intended despite opposition from the bureaucracy, the NGO complex and Democrats. Hot AirR “Whether that is a temporary dip in federal employment and an inconsequential shift in how business is done will depend on who succeeds Trump.”“it's pretty clear that DOGE accomplished at least some of what was intended” Read at Hot Air ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both opinion pieces are sympathetic to DOGE's aims. The Washington Examiner frames the story as entrenched bureaucracy outlasting a reformer; Hot Air frames DOGE as an underrated success measured in workforce cuts.
- Emphasis
- Washington Examiner: DOGE showed appetite for a smaller government, but 'the swamp' prevailed. Hot Air: headcount figures by agency and job type, and Musk's record of delivering 'late' rather than never.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither piece, as presented, quotes critics of DOGE or gives independent evidence on service impacts. Hot Air treats the savings shortfall briefly and does not weigh the costs of the job cuts beyond a remark about interior designers and creative-arts therapists.
- Charged language
- “the swamp”“Elon tamed the physics of government”“the NGO complex”“Bureaucracies are like mold”
- For example
-
“Outwitting DOGE: How ‘the swamp’ ran out the clock on Elon Musk” — Washington Examiner
“Elon can tame physics, but apparently bureaucracies are more stubborn in nature than the laws of nature.” — Hot Air
“Bureaucracies are like mold — they just keep growing and spreading.” — Hot Air
What every side reports
- Both pieces are right-leaning opinion commentary published on 16 October 2026.
- Both credit DOGE and Elon Musk with challenging the federal bureaucracy.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether DOGE ultimately succeeded against the bureaucracy
- Right
- Washington Examiner: 'the swamp' ran out the clock on Musk. Hot Air: DOGE worked, shrinking the civil service by more than 270,000, though lasting effect depends on Trump's successor.
Department of Government Efficiency organisation
Described by both commentators as having challenged the federal bureaucracy; one says it was outlasted, the other says it cut the civil service by about 12 percent.
“They took the federal bureaucracy head-on, a bane to the average American.” — Washington Examiner
“it had a massive impact on the federal civil service.” — Hot Air
Elon Musk person
Praised by both writers; Hot Air casts him as someone who delivers the impossible, but late, and says his government tenure was wrongly written off as a failure.
“I commend Elon Musk and all who worked with him at DOGE.” — Washington Examiner
“the line on Elon is that he delivers the impossible, but late.” — Hot Air
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
Washington ExaminerR · · Opinion
Outwitting DOGE: How ‘the swamp’ ran out the clock on Elon Musk
Mixed Op-ed that praises DOGE and Musk for exposing the problem but argues entrenched interests outlasted the effort.
-
Hot AirR · · Opinion
Elon's Forgotten Success: DOGE
Celebratory Op-ed arguing DOGE's workforce cuts were a real, overlooked success, while conceding it overpromised on savings.
- 16 Oct 14:00 First Washington ExaminerR Outwitting DOGE: How ‘the swamp’ ran out the clock on Elon Musk Opinion
- 16 Oct 17:00 +3h Hot AirR Elon's Forgotten Success: DOGE Opinion
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…