Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Two opinion pieces dispute what Trump's Russian diesel licence means

The US Treasury's General License 135 allows Russian diesel imports until April 2027. A Washington Examiner op-ed reads it as bargaining leverage; a South China Morning Post column sees sanctions treated as tradable.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: South China Morning Post

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 1On Oct. 9, President Donald Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the Treasury Department issued General License 135, which authorises the sale, delivery and import of Russian diesel through April 7, 2027, according to the Washington Examiner op-ed. Mixed · 2Both pieces say the first tanker, carrying about 40,000 tons of diesel, is due in New York four days after the Nov. 3 midterm elections. Centre · 1The South China Morning Post column describes the licence as temporary and meant to bring down pump prices before the midterms, and notes that Congress banned such imports in 2022. It says lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether the licence fits that ban.

Right · 1The Examiner op-ed argues the deal cannot lower diesel prices before the election: even the 300,000 tons Trump promised would cover roughly half a day of US distillate demand, and AAA put the average price at $6.32 a gallon on Oct. 18, higher than the week before. Mixed · 2Both pieces say Trump also suspended tariffs on the biggest buyers of Russian oil and gas. The Examiner says that on Oct. 16 Trump signed an order waiving the sanctions law's 500% tariff on Russian goods and 100% tariffs on the five biggest buyers, and that the waiver stays in place only until the president or secretary of state decides further action is needed. Right · 1The Examiner op-ed, by a former Georgian counterintelligence officer, rejects Bill and Hillary Clinton's criticism that Trump is abandoning Ukraine and acting as a "Putin puppet". It reads the licence and waiver as holstered pressure that can be reinstated if Putin stalls, and says Republican criticism makes that threat more credible in Moscow.

Right · 1As evidence of leverage, the Examiner points to a Russian partial easing of its diesel export ban, a prisoner swap of 270 each and a body exchange on Oct. 22–23, Putin's agreement in principle to resume three-way talks after Nov. 10, and continued Ukrainian refinery strikes. It also lists costs: Russian strikes on Kyiv's power plants left 600,000 people without electricity during an "energy ceasefire". Right · 1It also notes that Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) has introduced a bill to nullify the diesel licence and promised a discharge petition, which needs 218 signatures. Centre · 1The South China Morning Post column compares the deal to Ronald Reagan's 1982 offer to sell the Soviet Union grain 18 days before the midterms, after Reagan had sanctioned the Soviet gas pipeline. It argues the diesel deal shows that US sanctions bend to domestic politics: "Every government living under American restrictions now knows that they are for sale".

Centre · 1The column's main concern is China. It says China, the largest buyer of Russian oil and a major beneficiary of the waiver, will meet Trump at next month's APEC summit in Shenzhen seeking looser chip controls, and warns that trading those away would undermine the Netherlands and Japan, which restricted chip-equipment sales to China at Washington's request.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
A South China Morning Post column frames the licence as a Reagan-style election-year concession that teaches China and allies that US sanctions are negotiable.
Emphasis
Legal doubts over the licence, the arrival date after the midterms, China's gain, and the consequences for Dutch and Japanese chip-export controls.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the prisoner swaps, planned talks or Ukraine's strikes that the Examiner cites as evidence of leverage.
Charged language
“for sale”“diesel diplomacy”
For example
“Reagan’s grain offer taught Europeans that American sanctions bend to domestic politics.” — South China Morning Post
“This is where Trump’s diesel diplomacy does its real damage.” — South China Morning Post

Right1 outlet

Framing
A Washington Examiner op-ed defends the diesel licence as part of a bargaining strategy and rebuts the Clintons' "puppet" charge as a verdict reached before the evidence.
Emphasis
Prisoner and body exchanges, planned talks, Ukraine's continued refinery strikes, and the waiver's reversibility; the costs borne by Kyiv.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives little attention to allied or Chinese consequences, and does not discuss the legal question over the 2022 import ban.
Charged language
“Putin puppet”“A sanction in a holster”
For example
“A verdict delivered before the evidence is a mood, not a finding.” — Washington Examiner
“Every Republican denunciation of the waiver makes reinstatement more believable in Moscow.” — Washington Examiner

Ask about this story

Loading…