Conservatives propose work scheme and new allowance for jobless 18-24s instead of universal credit
Ahead of their conference, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch proposed that jobless 18-24-year-olds join a work scheme on a conditional allowance rather than claim universal credit. The Guardian and Daily Mail both cover it, with different emphasis.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has drawn up proposals to require jobless young people to undergo intensive work coaching instead of signing on immediately for Universal Credit. Daily MailR “Kemi Badenoch has drawn up proposals to require jobless teenagers to undergo intensive work coaching instead of signing on immediately for Universal Credit.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ The Guardian says the plan would stop many under-25s claiming universal credit, the main unemployment benefit, and was announced as the party's conference began. The GuardianLC “stopping many under-25s from being able to claim universal credit, the main unemployment benefit.” Read at The Guardian ↗ According to the party's news release, all 18-24-year-olds who try to claim and have not previously worked continuously for six months would have to join a Get to Work scheme, receiving a Get to Work Allowance conditional on taking part. The GuardianLC “The Conservatives will require all 18-24 year olds who attempt to claim universal credit and who have not previously worked for a continuous period of 6 months to participate in a Get to Work scheme in exchange for welfare.” Read at The Guardian ↗
Exemptions would apply to those with six months of continuous work of at least 16 hours a week, and to young people not subject to work requirements because of health or caring responsibilities. The GuardianLC “Young people on UC who are not subject to work-related requirements, such as for health reasons or due to caring responsibilities, will be exempt.” Read at The Guardian ↗ The scheme would last up to six months. Those still out of work would then move to a Subsistence Allowance worth 70% of the current standard allowance, loaded onto a card that blocks spending on alcohol, cigarettes and gambling. The GuardianLC “This is paid at 70% of the current Standard Allowance and will be pre-loaded onto a Back to Work card that prevents claimants spending on alcohol, cigarettes and gambling.” Read at The Guardian ↗ Badenoch told the Spectator that it is unfair to people who go to work for others to earn more than them for not working, and that the system must force a change. The GuardianLC “It’s unfair to the people who get up and go to work, having others earn more than them for not working.” Read at The Guardian ↗
The Tories call it a 'tough love' approach to the roughly one million young people who are not in employment, education or training (Neets). The GuardianLC “The Tories are describing this as a “tough love” approach designed to deal with the problem of around one million young people being Neets” Read at The Guardian ↗ The Guardian's live blog notes Labour had not yet responded. It says Alan Milburn's inquiry into Neets is due to report before the budget and is expected to propose more conditions on benefits, probably with more carrot and less stick, with possible overlap. The GuardianLC “We have not heard from Labour yet, and that may be because the party is not sure yet how to respond.” Read at The Guardian ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Detailed, explanatory live-blog entry setting out the scheme, its conditions and the party's release, with context on Labour's likely response and the Milburn inquiry.
- Emphasis
- Mechanics of the Get to Work Allowance and Subsistence Allowance, exemptions, and the policy context.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No Labour reaction yet; the piece notes this itself.
- Charged language
- “tough love”“nanny state with menaces”
- For example
-
“Tories suggest ‘tough love’ approach amid issue of one million young people not in employment, education or training” — The Guardian
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads with Badenoch acting to stop school leavers going 'straight on the dole', set against a Labour leader portrayed as moving left.
- Emphasis
- Preventing 'wasted' young lives and contrast with Andy Burnham's conference remarks.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Little detail on the allowance, conditions, exemptions or the 70% rate in the available text.
- Charged language
- “lurches further Left”“straight on the dole”“young lives being wasted”
- For example
-
“Kemi to stop school leavers going straight on the dole: As Burnham lurches further Left” — Daily Mail
What every side reports
- Kemi Badenoch's Conservatives propose requiring jobless young people to take part in work-focused support rather than claim universal credit straight away.
Kemi Badenoch person
Presents the plan as fairness to working people and a necessary push from government to break benefit dependency.
“no one wants to be the one to get off the treadmill first. We need to force that. Government has to do that.” — The Guardian
Conservative Party party
Describes the plan as a 'tough love' approach requiring participation in exchange for welfare.
“The Tories are describing this as a “tough love” approach” — The Guardian
Left1 article
-
Neutral Explains the policy in detail from the party release and interview, noting a colleague's colourful description and Labour's absence of response.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Celebratory Presents the proposal as a Tory bid to rescue young people, framed against Labour's leftward drift.

- 1 Oct 03:28 First Daily MailR Kemi to stop school leavers going straight on the dole: As Burnham lurches further Left - and talks of a second Brexit referendum - Tories launch bid to stop young lives being wasted...
- 1 Oct 09:04 +5h 36m The GuardianLC Badenoch proposes welfare reform that would stop many jobless under-25s getting universal credit – UK politics live
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.