Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Court of Appeal rejects Garvaghy Road residents' challenge to Drumcree parade decision

The Court of Appeal in Belfast refused Garvaghy Road residents leave to appeal against the Parades Commission's decision to allow an Orange Order parade, though the parade has since been banned by the Secretary of State.

2 outlets · 0L · 2C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: BBC News
Image: Evening Standard

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Centre · 2The Court of Appeal in Belfast on Monday 12 October dismissed Garvaghy Road residents' bid to challenge the Parades Commission's decision to allow the Drumcree Orange Order parade along the predominantly nationalist road in Portadown. Centre · 2Lady Chief Justice Dame Siobhan Keegan held that the application for leave to appeal had "no reasonable prospect of success", upholding the High Court's earlier rejection of the residents' judicial review. Centre · 2The residents had argued that the commission failed to properly weigh what police told it about the risk of disorder and reached an "irrational conclusion"; the court found the commission properly dealt with the police assessment and gave adequate reasons.

Centre · 2The judges stressed that they ruled only on the lawfulness of the decision, not on whether the march should take place, and that the case was heard and decided before Secretary of State Sir Chris Bryant banned the parade on Friday. Centre · 1Bryant's ban followed advice from the PSNI chief constable, and residents ended their constant presence on the Garvaghy Road after it. Centre · 2The Parades Commission had announced in September that the parade could go ahead on 27 September, for the first time in 28 years, starting earlier and with fewer people than the Orange Order wanted.

Centre · 1On 27 September up to 1,000 people, including nationalist politicians, blocked the road, and repeated Orange Order attempts to walk the route since have been stopped by police. Centre · 2Loyalist activist Jamie Bryson called the day "seismic" and said the Portadown District had a legal right to walk the road and that objections were "unarguable as a matter of law". Centre · 1Residents' spokesperson Breandan Mac Cionnaith called the judgment "academic" because the parade is banned, said the ban was what residents sought, and said he and his legal team would consider a further challenge.

Centre · 1The Drumcree dispute began in the mid-1990s, nearly derailed the peace process and involved riots, roadblocks and murders; the Parades Commission was set up in 1998 to regulate parades.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets report the judgment straightforwardly, stressing the court's limited legal remit and the later ministerial ban; the Evening Standard leads on the opposing reactions.
Emphasis
BBC adds Drumcree history and the 27 September blockade; Evening Standard adds the legal arguments and residents' possible further challenge.
Leaves out or plays down
BBC carries no residents' reaction; Evening Standard gives less historical background.
Charged language
“seismic”“academic”
For example
“Loyalist Jamie Bryson hailed the judgment as ‘seismic’ while Breandan Mac Cionnaith said it was ‘academic’ as the parade remains banned.” — Evening Standard
“Judges said their decision was confined to the lawfulness of the decision, not in deciding whether or not the march should occur.” — BBC News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…