Daughter awarded £127,500 by High Court for caring for her mother at home
Bern Rogers, 71, of Bristol, was awarded £127,500 from her late mother's estate for 850 days of care, after being acquitted of theft and fraud over a £100,000 withdrawal. The executor, her brother Andrew Wills, disputes that a contract existed, and the BBC reports the estate intends to appeal the amount.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2A High Court ruling has entitled Bern Rogers, from Bristol, to be paid £127,500 from her late mother Sheila Wills's estate for caring for her at home. BBC NewsN “she was owed £127,500 for the 850 days of care she provided” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “The court found Ms Rogers had provided care for 850 days and awarded her £150 per day, totalling £127,500.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Mixed · 2Mrs Wills moved into Ms Rogers's Bristol home in September 2017. She had dementia and physical health problems including a painful prolapse, and she was cared for there for about two-and-a-half years until she died in April 2020. BBC NewsN “After Sheila moved into Bern's house in Bristol in September 2017” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “Mrs Wills eventually required 24-hour help with personal care, assistance eating, support with incontinence and treatment for a painful prolapse.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Mixed · 2Ms Rogers and her husband Jon describe the care as round-the-clock, saying they could not leave Mrs Wills alone and that Ms Rogers slept on the floor of her mother's bedroom in the final weeks. Ms Rogers says her mother wanted to be cared for by her daughter rather than by paid carers or in a home, and insisted she be paid. BBC NewsN “He remembered that in Sheila's final weeks, his wife was sleeping on the floor of her mother's bedroom” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “My mum kept saying, "I don't want charity.” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Mixed · 2Shortly after her mother's death, Ms Rogers transferred £100,000 from the estate. The money was seized or recovered by banks amid fraud concerns, she was reported to police for theft and fraud and charged, and a jury at Bristol Crown Court found her not guilty in 2022. BBC NewsN “But, at a trial at Bristol Crown Court in 2022, she was found not guilty by a jury.” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “The money was recovered by the banks and returned to the estate amid concerns of possible fraud” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Mixed · 2Ms Rogers then went to the civil courts. In 2025 a High Court judge ruled she had entered into an informal contract with her mother for payment of a reasonable sum for her care, and the estate was ordered to pay her legal costs. The Daily Mail adds that the court also found the estate had benefited from the care through unjust enrichment. BBC NewsN “a High Court judge ruled she had entered into an informal contract with Sheila for payment of a reasonable sum for her care.” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “even without a contract, her mother's estate had benefited from her care through the legal principle of unjust enrichment.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Mixed · 2In August 2026 a second High Court judge set the amount at £150 a day for 850 days. Messages from Ms Rogers's five siblings shown in court said she should be paid something for the care, though no sum was agreed. Daily MailR “awarded her £150 per day, totalling £127,500” Read at Daily Mail ↗ BBC NewsN “Multiple messages from Bern's siblings were shown in court saying that she should be paid something for the care, although no amount was agreed.” Read at BBC News ↗
Mixed · 2Her brother Andrew Wills, the estate's executor, said the siblings knew only of an agreement to give her £50 a week 'keep' and ensure she was not out of pocket, and were not told of any other contract. He said the estate was willing to pay genuine expenses plus a gratuity, and that Ms Rogers rejected its offers and issued proceedings. The Daily Mail quotes him calling the judgment 'disappointing' and saying he doubts his 'frugal' mother would have agreed to commercial care rates for family. BBC NewsN “The estate has always been willing to pay Bernadette her genuine expenses as well as an additional gratuity in recognition of her efforts for our mother.” Read at BBC News ↗ Daily MailR “As a frugal person, I very much doubt that my mother would ever have agreed to pay commercial care rates to one of her own family for care.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Centre · 1The BBC reports that the ruling on entitlement cannot be appealed, but the estate intends to appeal the second ruling on the amount. BBC NewsN “the estate intends to lodge an appeal against the second ruling that decided the amount owed.” Read at BBC News ↗ Centre · 1Legal experts told the BBC the ruling does not automatically set a precedent but is likely to prompt similar claims. Emma Holland of Stewarts said courts are willing to apply ordinary contract principles to family relationships, and Beth Middleton of JMW said it would 'open a floodgate of claims'. BBC NewsN “this case does not automatically set a legal precedent, it is likely to lead to similar claims in future.”“open a floodgate of claims” Read at BBC News ↗
Right · 1Ms Rogers says the estate was worth over £400,000, including about £235,000 from the sale of her mother's Norfolk home, and that her siblings received their shares while she received nothing. The couple say they remain estranged from the siblings, all five of whom gave statements against her in the criminal case. Daily MailR “The estate was reportedly worth over £400,000, which included Mrs Wills's Norfolk home sale of around £235k after her death”“they remain estranged from Ms Rogers's siblings” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- A human-interest report built on Ms Rogers's relief at vindication, followed by legal experts on what the ruling means for future claims, with the estate's statement included.
- Emphasis
- The legal significance for other carers, with three named solicitors, and the estate's intention to appeal the amount.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not give the £150 daily rate, the unjust enrichment finding or the estate's value.
- Charged language
- “phenomenal”“hugely significant”“open a floodgate of claims”
- For example
-
“Legal experts said the "hugely significant" High Court ruling would lead to other claims.” — BBC News
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- A personal-grievance story told through Ms Rogers and her husband, with the headline and lede centred on feeling like a criminal after the family dispute.
- Emphasis
- The family rift, the criminal trial, the estate's size and her siblings' inheritances, plus the £150-a-day calculation.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The visible text does not include the legal experts' caution that the ruling is not automatically a precedent, and does not mention the estate's planned appeal. The lede says she 'took £127,500' although the £100,000 withdrawal and the award were separate.
- Charged language
- “terrible criminal”“bitter family court battle”“scapegoat”
- For example
-
“I went from being held up as a saint for looking after mum to suddenly being this terrible criminal.” — Daily Mail
What every side reports
- Bern Rogers was awarded £127,500 for 850 days of care for her mother Sheila, who died in April 2020.
- She transferred £100,000 from the estate, was charged, and was acquitted at trial.
- A 2025 High Court ruling found an informal contract for payment of a reasonable sum.
- Executor Andrew Wills says the siblings knew of no contract beyond £50 a week 'keep' and covering expenses.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Mrs Wills agreed to pay her daughter for care
- Centre
- The High Court found an informal contract; the executor says the siblings knew only of £50 a week and expenses.
- Right
- The same court finding is reported, plus unjust enrichment; Mr Wills doubts his 'frugal' mother would have agreed to commercial rates.
-
Whether the case sets a precedent
- Centre
- Experts say it does not automatically set precedent but is likely to be influential and lead to more claims.
- Right
- Ms Rogers says it 'is going to set a precedent and create case law'.
-
Length of the dispute
- Centre
- Ms Rogers calls it a journey of nine years.
- Right
- Describes a six-and-a-half-year dispute.
Bern Rogers person
Says she cared for her mother 24 hours a day under an agreement that she would be paid, feels vindicated, and hopes the case helps other carers, while describing her siblings' treatment of her as a betrayal.
“It has been absolutely wonderful to be vindicated.” — BBC News
“That was my contract with her.” — Daily Mail
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
Daughter wins £127k claim for caring for mum at home
Sympathetic Sympathetic to Ms Rogers but balanced with the estate's statement and legal experts on wider implications.

Right1 article
-
Sympathetic Personal-grievance account that foregrounds Ms Rogers and her husband's testimony and her siblings' inheritances, with the executor's view later and shorter.

- 26 Oct 06:23 First BBC NewsN Daughter wins £127k claim for caring for mum at home
- 29 Oct 00:50 +66h 27m Daily MailR My siblings made me feel like a criminal after I cared for our dying mother 24 hours a day, says daughter who has now won £127,500 from her estate after bitter family court battle
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…