Skip to content
Bramble

US

DC election board asks National Guard to keep troops away from ballot drop boxes

The D.C. Board of Elections asked the National Guard to limit where troops stand near drop boxes after a video showed Guard members beside one the day before drop boxes opened. Outlets differ on how many troops were pictured and how serious the episode was.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Raw Story
Image: Washington Examiner

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The D.C. Board of Elections has asked the National Guard to keep troops away from ballot drop boxes after complaints about Guard members posted beside one just before voting began. Mixed · 2Board spokesperson Sarah Graham said the board was addressing the concerns with the Guard directly and had asked it to limit the placement of Guard members near drop boxes and other voting locations in the District. Mixed · 2The complaints followed a video filmed Thursday. Raw Story says it was filmed by D.C.-based commentator Bryan K. Randolph and showed what he said were three Guard members in front of a drop box by the Foggy Bottom-GWU Metro station. The Washington Examiner describes it as posted by a left-wing account on X and showing two Guard members standing by a box.

Right · 1The Examiner notes the drop boxes did not open until Friday, after the video was taken, so the box was not yet in use. It says the account nonetheless said the troops looked "like they're guarding" the box and were committing a federal crime. Right · 1A National Guard spokesperson said the Guard was "aware of imagery circulating online" and was "actively addressing this specific instance." Left · 1The city's 55 drop boxes opened Friday and will accept ballots through Election Day on Nov. 3. More than 63,000 D.C. voters used them in the June primary, roughly 40% of votes cast, according to the Washington Sun as cited by Raw Story.

Left · 1Raw Story cites a federal statute barring anyone in federal civil or military service from keeping "any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held" unless needed "to repel armed enemies of the United States." Left · 1Monica Hopkins of the ACLU of the District of Columbia said "Armed troops do not belong near ballot boxes" and called the deployment "an affront to democracy." Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton had demanded answers in June over a different video of Guard members gathered around a drop box. Right · 1President Donald Trump first deployed the Guard to Washington in August 2025 to crack down on crime, and the administration extended the deployment through 2029 in July. The administration cites reduced crime, a Niskanen Center study found a reduction of about 24 percent, and critics point to the cost, which the Congressional Budget Office put at about $3 million per day.

Left · 1Raw Story adds that Trump told Time on Oct. 1 "I don't rule anything out or in" when asked about declaring a state of emergency before the midterms, and told The New York Times in January he "should have" ordered the Guard to seize ballot boxes in 2020, per Democracy Docket.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Treats the placement as a troubling sign of military presence near voting, with legal and political context on the Guard and Trump.
Emphasis
Federal law on troops at elections, ACLU and Norton criticism, and Trump's comments on emergencies and ballot boxes.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not note the box was not yet in use when filmed or give the Guard's response.
Charged language
“Alarm bells ring”“troubling”“like an occupying force”
For example
“Alarm bells ring at 'troubling' National Guard placement at DC drop boxes as voting begins” — Raw Story
“Especially jarring in the nations capital, like an occupying force,”” — Raw Story

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Presents the board's action as a response to an online complaint from a left-wing account, stressing that the box was not yet in use.
Emphasis
Guard statement, crime reduction, the Niskanen study, and costs.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the federal statute, the ACLU and Norton criticism, the June precedent and Trump's election remarks.
Charged language
“left-wing account”“nonchalantly”
For example
“The outcry came after a left-wing account on X posted a video” — Washington Examiner
“meaning the box wasn’t in use.” — Washington Examiner