Skip to content
Bramble

US

Democratic doctors and scientists win in US midterms, dubbed 'Stem swing'

Democratic candidates with medical and scientific backgrounds won seats in the 2026 US midterms, including two Senate races, a governorship and several House flips. A group that backed them calls it a rebuke of Robert F Kennedy Jr's health agenda, and some races are still uncalled.

3 outlets · 3L · 0C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: Scientific American
Image: Wired

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Left · 2Democratic doctors, scientists and other health and science professionals won races across the ballot in the 2026 US midterms, which a political group that backed them calls the "Stem swing" and "revenge of the nerds". Left · 1Abdul El-Sayed, an epidemiologist who previously led Detroit's public health department, was elected to the Senate in Michigan, and pediatrician Annie Andrews flipped a Senate seat in South Carolina, defeating incumbent Republican Darline Graham. Left · 1The Guardian notes that the last time a Democratic doctor held a US Senate seat was in 1969.

Left · 1Amy Acton, Ohio's public health chief during Covid-19, beat Vivek Ramaswamy to become governor, and Josh Green won a second term as Hawaii's governor; Scientific American says they are the only two physician-governors in the country. Left · 1In the House, Democrats with science or health backgrounds flipped seats including Iowa's first district, where Christina Bohannan, an environmental engineer and lawyer, beat Republican physician Mariannette Miller-Meeks by nearly 10 points, and Wisconsin's first, where ER nurse Mitchell Berman narrowly beat Bryan Steil. Left · 1Other new House members include Rebecca Bennett (New Jersey's 7th, defeating Tom Kean Jr), Jasmine Clark (Georgia's 13th, described as the first Black woman with a science Ph.D. in Congress), Adam Hamawy (New Jersey's 12th), Daniel Biss (Illinois's 9th), Richard Pan (California's 6th) and Jacqui Irwin (California's 26th), while Elaine Luria returns for Virginia's 2nd.

Left · 2Republicans with medical or scientific backgrounds also won, including neuroscientist John Cowan in Georgia's 11th and re-elected physicians Andy Harris, Ronny Jackson, John Joyce, Rich McCormick and Bob Onder; Senate candidate Roger Marshall, an ally of Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, lost in Kansas. Left · 2All incumbent Democratic doctors won their races, and the Guardian says races for three more Republican doctors were too close to call; Scientific American lists several uncalled races involving scientists or health professionals of both parties. Left · 1Erik Polyak, executive director of 3.14 Action, which worked to elect Democratic health professionals and scientists, said "2026 was a healthcare election" and claimed the group had flipped at least 10 Republican seats, with the final number in the low 30s; the group is still tallying results in hundreds of state races.

Left · 1The Guardian ties the result to years of upheaval at US health and science agencies under Trump and Kennedy, citing a reported loss of up to a third of CDC staff during a record measles outbreak, and says Democrats ran more than 158,000 healthcare ads against 61,000 for Republicans, per the Cook Political Report; 3.14 Action spent $23m on independent ads. Left · 1Richard Besser of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said voters' message was "enough", citing frustration with living costs and the healthcare system. Left · 2Looking ahead, the Guardian says the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's most severe cuts, including Medicaid work requirements, take effect on 1 January 2027 and are expected to leave 17 million people without insurance over a decade, while public health groups are already calling for Kennedy's removal; Scientific American notes the current Congress has a record 20 physicians, a figure the next could surpass.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left3 outlets

Framing
The Guardian leads with the political meaning, a win for science and a rebuke of Maha and Trump, relying on 3.14 Action and health-policy voices. Scientific American gives a service-style profile list of elected scientists and clinicians across both parties.
Emphasis
Guardian: Kennedy's cuts at CDC, NIH and FDA, ad spending, and coming Medicaid cuts. Scientific American: each winner's professional background and district.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither includes Republican, Kennedy or administration responses. The Guardian says little about Republican scientists who won; Scientific American does not discuss policy drivers.
Charged language
“revenge of the nerds”“Stem swing”“stunning rebuke of Trumpism”“draconian cuts”“zealots”
For example
“is calling the stunning rebuke of Trumpism the “Stem swing” and “revenge of the nerds”.” — The Guardian
“Kennedy disrupted and defunded federal work on vaccines to placate a base of zealots” — The Guardian
“Here’s what you need to know about some of the politicians who will be bringing a scientific background into public office.” — Scientific American

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…