Skip to content
Bramble

US

Senate Judiciary Democrats demand Grassley apologise to Jack Smith and release withheld records

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Dick Durbin, wrote to Chairman Chuck Grassley demanding records they say were withheld before a hearing at which Sen. Eric Schmitt wrongly suggested Jack Smith had perjured himself, and an apology to Smith.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Raw Story
Image: Washington Examiner

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by ranking member Dick Durbin (D-IL), sent a letter to Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), dated Wednesday and obtained by Politico, demanding that he apologise to former special counsel Jack Smith on the committee's behalf and hand over withheld records. Mixed · 2The letter stems from a hearing on Sept. 29, at which Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) displayed text messages from Smith's team placing him at a 'Hawks' game on Feb. 3, 2024, and suggested Smith had secretly attended an NBA game in Atlanta to meet prosecutors on the Georgia election case against Donald Trump. Mixed · 2Smith denied it and said he had been at the University of Maryland that day, at a women's basketball game between the Terrapins and the University of Iowa Hawkeyes, according to the Washington Examiner.

Right · 1Schmitt told Smith, 'I think you've already perjured yourself,' and called him 'a dirtbag', which the Democrats' letter says was 'beneath the dignity of this Committee and the Senate'. Left · 1The Democrats say the episode caused 'needless confusion', slowed the committee's business and risked false information entering the record uncontested; they also say they did not receive Schmitt's materials in advance, so had to respond in real time. Mixed · 2They accuse Grassley of violating Senate rules by not providing relevant records before the hearing, including a readout of an Aug. 17, 2024 call between Smith and the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section that Schmitt and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) both cited; the letter says they still have not received these records.

Mixed · 2Grassley spokesperson Clare Slattery replied that 'it's Jack Smith who owes an apology to the thousands of Americans he and his staff ran roughshod over'; the Washington Examiner says Schmitt has maintained that no error was made.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Frames Grassley as 'under fire' for 'hiding' documents, focusing on the withheld records and Schmitt's embarrassment.
Emphasis
Withheld committee records, the Aug. 17, 2024 call readout, and Grassley's spokesperson's response.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention that Schmitt maintains no error was made, nor the Maryland-Iowa game explanation.
Charged language
“under the gun”“hidden docs”“botched attack”“embarrassing himself”
For example
“is under fire from Democrats for hiding documents related to former special counsel Jack Smith” — Raw Story

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Treats it as a continuing embarrassment for Schmitt, centred on the sports-team mix-up, while reporting the Democrats' demands in detail.
Emphasis
The Hawks/Hawkeyes confusion, the 'dirtbag' remark and Schmitt's refusal to concede a mistake.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include Grassley's spokesperson's rebuttal.
Charged language
“perjury flub”“gaffe”“embarrassing gaffe”
For example
“Schmitt was caught in the embarrassing gaffe last month during the congressional questioning of Smith” — Washington Examiner