Skip to content
Bramble

US

ABC and Disney ask federal judge to block FCC's early review of ABC station licences

At a Washington hearing on 6 October, ABC and Disney asked U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan to block FCC Chair Brendan Carr's early review of licences for ABC's eight owned stations. They say it is retaliation for ABC's speech; the government says it concerns a hiring investigation.

4 outlets · 3L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from CBS News, Deadline.

Image: Raw Story
Image: CBS News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Left · 1ABC and its parent company Disney asked U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan in Washington on Tuesday 6 October to block an early review by FCC Chair Brendan Carr of the licences for all eight ABC-owned stations. Centre · 1ABC sued the FCC in August after the agency's order requiring its eight broadcast stations to submit to an early renewal proceeding; Deadline calls the action highly unusual and the suit the first major media challenge to the FCC's regulatory threats since Trump returned to office. Left · 2Carr ordered the review in April, a day after President Trump urged ABC to fire late-night host Jimmy Kimmel; Trump has repeatedly called for Kimmel's firing for mocking him and has denounced ABC's The View as unfair.

Left · 1ABC's lawsuit says the administration is targeting the network because it "disapproves of what ABC broadcasts"; ABC attorney Beth Wilkinson told the judge the conduct is unconstitutional. Centre · 1In a two-hour hearing, Wilkinson said "We are watching everything we do," pointed to Trump's call for ABC to lose its licences over the July speech, and likened the threat to a "death penalty" for stations and to a guillotine. Left · 1The government's lawyer said the review grew out of an anti-discrimination investigation into ABC's diversity and hiring practices, and was about ABC's failure to fully answer the FCC's hiring inquiries rather than about the licences themselves.

Left · 1ABC's lawyers countered that the FCC cannot legally renew a licence more than 30 days before it expires and that some licences are not up for renewal for years, so early renewal is a tool about licences; they also noted that Carr said ABC's July decision not to air a prime-time Trump speech live would be part of the review. Left · 1The government also argued that the court lacks jurisdiction, saying the case belongs in a federal appeals court, and that ABC has suffered no lasting harm because its licences remain active; ABC replied that it is challenging a pressure campaign, not a final ruling, and that it is chilled, with Wilkinson saying it is making different editorial decisions. Centre · 1Assistant U.S. Attorney Dimitar P. Georgiev, for the FCC, said ABC is a regulated entity under regulatory inquiry and could have appealed the media bureau's order to the full commission; Wilkinson replied that the commission could still reject the appeal, letting Carr delay proceedings for years.

Left · 1ABC says The View has not invited a political candidate on air since February because of the FCC's pressure. Centre · 1The View's decision to forgo clips of political candidates in its Hot Topics segment follows an FCC investigation launched in February after Texas Senate candidate James Talarico appeared; the equal time rule requires comparable time for rivals, and ABC contends The View falls under a news-programming exemption. Left · 1The judge pressed both sides: she asked whether the government's position undercut its hiring-only explanation and whether the FCC's aim might be to force cooperation rather than punish speech, and she called the argument that ABC can absorb the costs "curious"; the government's lawyer conceded ABC's broadcasts are protected speech.

Mixed · 2Judge AliKhan made no ruling on Tuesday and asked the parties for additional submissions with deadlines through 14 October; the FCC has promised the court 48 hours' notice before sending ABC's licences to a formal hearing.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left3 outlets

Framing
Raw Story's live-hearing report relays ABC's lawyers and free speech advocates with approving commentary ("damning", "nuts"); NPR's opening stresses Trump's attacks on Kimmel and The View.
Emphasis
Trump's calls to fire Kimmel, ABC's arguments and supporters' commentary on the hearing.
Leaves out or plays down
The government's case is relayed mostly through ABC-side observers; no FCC or administration statement appears directly.
Charged language
“tore into”“damning”“nuts”
For example
“"The government's position is nuts!" Cohn wrote” — Raw Story
“Trump has also routinely denounced ABC's The View, accusing it of being unfair.” — NPR

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Deadline gives a procedural account of the hearing: ABC's chilling-effect argument alongside the jurisdictional hurdle the network must overcome.
Emphasis
The jurisdiction and exhaustion question, which took up much of the hearing, the 14 October submissions, and the equal time rule's effect on The View.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report the 30-day renewal rule argument or the judge's questions to the government on Trump's statements.
For example
“A large portion of Tuesday’s hearing was devoted to a critical jurisdictional question the network must overcome first.” — Deadline

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.