DOJ sues Alaska to block Senate certification over two Dan Sullivans on ballot
The Justice Department sued Alaska election officials to stop certification of the Senate race if Sen. Dan Sullivan loses, citing voter confusion over a second "Dan Sullivan" on the ballot. Attorney General Todd Blanche defends it as a ballot-preservation step; critics call it election interference.
1 / 8
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2The Justice Department sued Alaska election officials on Thursday, 22 October, asking a federal court to block certification of the state's U.S. Senate result if Republican incumbent Dan S. Sullivan does not win the 3 November election. Al JazeeraLC “the Justice Department’s lawsuit, filed on October 22, has been the subject of bipartisan criticism.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ NBC NewsLC “The DOJ’s lawsuit asks the court to block the Alaska Senate results from being certified if Dan S. Sullivan does not win the election” Read at NBC News ↗ Left · 2The department argues that the presence on the ballot of Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., a retired teacher and former Forest Service employee, could mislead voters seeking to back the senator, and that the outcome would be "tainted" by his inclusion. NBC NewsLC “arguing that candidate Dan J. Sullivan Jr.’s appearance on the ballot could mislead those who wish to vote for Sen. Dan S. Sullivan’s re-election.” Read at NBC News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “Any result in the Senate race, it argues, would be “tainted by the inclusion on the ballot of Daniel J Sullivan”.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Mixed · 2The filing asks the court to find that Sullivan would have won had every vote for Dan J. Sullivan gone to him under Alaska's ranked-choice process, and says defendants should "not certify any election result that may be impacted by voter confusion." NBC NewsLC “if “had all votes cast for Dan J. Sullivan been cast instead for Senator Sullivan and Alaska’s rank-choice process played out accordingly, Senator Sullivan would have won the election.”” Read at NBC News ↗ Washington ExaminerR “it is vital that Defendants not certify any election result that may be impacted by voter confusion.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Mixed · 2President Donald Trump told reporters on Friday, "I'm the one that said 'do it'," and has called ranked-choice voting a "Democrat scam" and said Democrats put the second Sullivan on the ballot to confuse voters; Dan J. Sullivan has denied any such intent or contact with the Peltola campaign. NewsweekN “Trump has acknowledged directing the DOJ to pursue the case, telling reporters: "I'm the one that said 'do it,'" as he arrived in Florida Friday afternoon.” Read at Newsweek ↗ Al JazeeraLC “I am not a registered Democrat, and I have had no conversations whatsoever with the Peltola campaign about my candidacy,” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ Mixed · 2On Sunday 25 October, Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer to Trump, defended the suit on CNN's State of the Union and CBS's Face the Nation, saying Trump is not trying to take over a state election "in any way, shape, or form" and that the DOJ is "not laying any groundwork" for that. South China Morning PostN “is not trying to overturn state election results “in any way, shape or form” on the cusp of the November 3 election, Blanche told CNN’s State of the Union.” Read at South China Morning Post ↗ The Straits TimesRC ““We’re not laying any groundwork for the president to do that.”” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2Blanche described the suit as meant to "put guardrails in place" so ballots are preserved to assess voter confusion, saying "It's not saying, 'Don't certify,'" but that if a court finds the result was decided by confusion rather than the will of the voters, states should not certify. South China Morning PostN “The lawsuit, he told CBS’ Face the Nation, is meant to “put guardrails in place” to preserve possible evidence of voter confusion at the polls.” Read at South China Morning Post ↗ Washington ExaminerR ““It’s not saying don’t certify. It’s saying if a court ultimately determines that it was decided because of confusion and not the will of the voters, then we do not think the states should certify” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Right · 1The Washington Examiner noted that the DOJ's filing itself urges officials not to certify if voters may have been confused, which it said sits uneasily with that description. Washington ExaminerR “However, the DOJ’s filing urges state election officials not to certify the results of the election if there is suspicion voters were confused by the two candidates named Dan Sullivan.” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Mixed · 2Blanche declined to say whether Trump ordered the filing, saying he would "never, ever, ever" discuss his communications with the president, and became openly frustrated when CNN's Dana Bash raised January 6, calling the question "crazy." Al JazeeraLC ““I will never, ever, ever talk about communications that I have with the president of the United States. I never have, and I never will,” Blanche said.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗ BreitbartR “Blanche said, “Oh, stop it! You’ve gotta stop it with that! You are not being a real person! Come on man, That is crazy!”” Read at Breitbart ↗ Centre · 2Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola, a former congresswoman, called the suit "flagrant, flagrant corruption"; Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said the DOJ "should never have filed" it, and Trump then attacked Murkowski on Truth Social as the "Republicans' Worst Senator." South China Morning PostN “Peltola called it “just flagrant, flagrant corruption in my opinion”” Read at South China Morning Post ↗ NewsweekN ““The Department of Justice should never have filed this lawsuit.”” Read at Newsweek ↗
Mixed · 2Peltola's campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee have moved to intervene and dismiss the suit, calling it "an unprecedented pre-emptive strike on democratic elections," and asked for a ruling before election day; the court had not set a hearing date. NBC NewsLC “called the lawsuit filed by the Justice Department “an unprecedented pre-emptive strike on democratic elections.”” Read at NBC News ↗ NewsweekN “requested an expedited consideration of their motions to intervene and dismiss the case, seeking a ruling “before election day”” Read at Newsweek ↗ Centre · 1Their filing cites Trump's Truth Social posts and says they fear the suit will be used to "lay the groundwork for unlawful efforts to challenge a potential Peltola victory." NewsweekN ““lay the groundwork for unlawful efforts to challenge a potential Peltola victory.”” Read at Newsweek ↗ Left · 2Legal and election experts told NBC News the case is on shaky ground, since states and localities, not the federal government, run and certify elections; Al Jazeera said experts expect such a move to be deemed illegal. NBC NewsLC “As U.S. elections are run and certified by state and local officials, rather than the federal government, the law limits the Justice Department’s role in elections.” Read at NBC News ↗ Al JazeeraLC “experts say such a move is likely to be deemed illegal.” Read at Al Jazeera ↗
Mixed · 2Alaska has already taken steps on the issue: after Dan J. Sullivan Jr. was removed from the ballot in June, a court reversed that decision, and the November ballot will label Dan S. Sullivan as "registered Republican" and "incumbent" while Dan J. Sullivan Jr. appears with the suffix and no party. NBC NewsLC “a judge in Alaska overturned the decision later that month, validating his campaign.” Read at NBC News ↗ South China Morning PostN “Alaskan voters will see “Dan S. Sullivan” identified as a “registered Republican” and “incumbent” on their ballots, while “Daniel J. Sullivan Jr.” will not have a party affiliation.” Read at South China Morning Post ↗ Mixed · 2Trump said on Sunday that "a lot of people don't know what incumbent means" and that the ballot is "illegal because it's unfair". South China Morning PostN ““At least let him use the name Senator Dan Sullivan as opposed to incumbent, because a lot of people don’t know what incumbent means,” Trump said.” Read at South China Morning Post ↗ The Straits TimesRC ““I think it’s illegal because it’s unfair. You want fairness in voting.”” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2The race is rated a toss-up and polls show Peltola narrowly ahead; the suit is one of several federal election actions, including a suit over California mail ballots, and election officials told Reuters they are preparing for possible federal interference. NBC NewsLC “The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rated the Alaska Senate contest as a “toss-up.”” Read at NBC News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “the Trump administration has taken other vote-related actions against states, including a lawsuit to stop California from counting certain mail-in ballots” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left6 outlets
- Framing
- Frames the suit as a potential attempt to pre-empt a Democratic win, stressing expert doubts, bipartisan criticism and Blanche's combative interviews.
- Emphasis
- Legal weakness, comparisons to 2020/January 6, Trump's attacks on Murkowski and voters.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Less on Trump's and Blanche's stated confusion rationale beyond brief relays.
- Charged language
- “election interference”“midnight meltdown”“loses it”
- For example
-
“Trump’s efforts to block the certification of Alaska’s U.S. Senate race if the Republican candidate doesn’t win are reminiscent of the doubts he sowed before his 2020 election loss” — The Independent
“Many have accused President Donald Trump’s administration of laying the groundwork to block a Democratic win in the race.” — Al Jazeera
“Legal and election experts told NBC News that the DOJ’s case is on shaky ground.” — NBC News
Centre3 outlets
- Framing
- Mostly straight reporting of the suit, Blanche's defence, Trump's remarks and the Peltola filing, with ranked-choice explainers and polling.
- Emphasis
- Trump-Murkowski feud, ranked-choice voting, polls, court filings.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Little on Blanche's CNN clash; Newsweek's Murkowski piece does not say the filing asks for non-certification explicitly.
- Charged language
- “decoy”“TOTAL DEMOCRAT SCAM”
- For example
-
“whether votes cast for the retired teacher — whom the administration characterizes as a “decoy”” — Newsweek
“argued that the legal challenge was a necessary step to avoid confusing voters in the closely watched midterm race.” — South China Morning Post
Right3 outlets
- Framing
- Focuses on Trump's complaints about ranked-choice voting and confusion and on Blanche's pushback against hostile interviewers, while the Examiner notes the gap between his description and the filing.
- Emphasis
- Ranked-choice 'corruption', voter confusion, Blanche's refusal to discuss Trump communications.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Expert criticism and the Peltola motion get little space.
- Charged language
- “corrupt”“absolute fraud”“Not Being a Real Person”
- For example
-
“President Donald Trump railed against Alaska’s “corrupt” ranked choice voting system” — Washington Examiner
“Blanche said, “Because the Department of Justice is concerned that there is an absolute fraud happening in Alaska” — Breitbart
“However, the DOJ’s filing urges state election officials not to certify the results” — Washington Examiner
What every side reports
- The DOJ sued Alaska election officials in the week of 22 October over the two Dan Sullivans on the 3 November ballot.
- Trump said he told the DOJ to file the suit; Blanche declined to discuss his communications with Trump.
- Blanche denied the DOJ is laying groundwork to overturn an election.
- Peltola's campaign and the DSCC have moved to dismiss the suit.
- Experts and critics, including Sen. Murkowski, have questioned the suit.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the suit seeks to block certification or just preserve ballots
- Left
- Outlets relay Blanche's 'guardrails' defence alongside the filing's call for no certification and criticism from experts and Democrats.
- Centre
- AP/SCMP and Newsweek relay Blanche's account that it preserves evidence and is not 'Don't certify.'
- Right
- Washington Examiner notes the filing urges officials not to certify, contradicting Blanche's description; Breitbart presents Blanche's pushback on Bash.
-
Whether Dan J. Sullivan is a deliberate decoy
- Left
- Reports his denial and the 'spoiler' concern as an allegation.
- Centre
- Newsweek says the administration characterizes him as a 'decoy' and Trump alleged Democrats planted him without evidence.
- Right
- Straits Times (Reuters) and Breitbart relay Blanche's claim that he runs 'to confuse voters' and of 'absolute fraud'; Sullivan's denial is noted in Reuters copy.
-
The DOJ lawsuit only seeks to preserve ballots and does not ask that Alaska refrain from certifying results.
Reported- Disputes 1
- Washington Examiner
- Reports 3
- Al Jazeera, Newsweek, South China Morning Post
-
The DOJ's Alaska lawsuit was filed at President Trump's direction.
Reported- Reports 4
- Al Jazeera, Newsweek, The Straits Times, Washington Examiner
-
Legal experts view the DOJ's Alaska case as legally weak because states, not the federal government, run and certify elections.
Reported- Reports 4
- Al Jazeera, NBC News, Newsweek, The Straits Times
-
Blanche denied that the DOJ is laying groundwork for Trump to overturn an election.
Reported- Reports 3
- Al Jazeera, Breitbart, The Straits Times
Todd Blanche person
Defends the suit as a limited step to preserve ballots and address voter confusion, denies groundwork to overturn results, and won't discuss talks with Trump.
“We are not doing anything improper. We’re not doing anything we’re not allowed to do.” — South China Morning Post
““I will never, ever, ever talk about communications that I have with the president of the United States.” — Al Jazeera
Donald Trump person
Says he ordered the suit, calls the ballot unfair and ranked-choice voting a Democratic scam.
“Trump has acknowledged directing the DOJ to pursue the case, telling reporters: "I'm the one that said 'do it,'"” — Newsweek
Mary Peltola person
Calls the suit corruption and a diversion; her campaign seeks dismissal, saying it lays groundwork to challenge a Peltola win.
“Peltola called it “just flagrant, flagrant corruption in my opinion”” — South China Morning Post
““lay the groundwork for unlawful efforts to challenge a potential Peltola victory.”” — Newsweek
Lisa Murkowski person
Says Alaska has already distinguished the candidates and DOJ should not have filed; Trump attacked her in response.
““Alaskans don’t need any help voting for their preferred candidates, and the State of Alaska has already handled this by clearly distinguishing the candidates on this year’s ballot,”” — Newsweek
East and Southeast Asia2 outlets
AP and Reuters copy carried by SCMP and the Straits Times centre on Blanche's denial of designs on state elections, with Reuters adding the wider federal election-interference context.
“Election officials around the country have told Reuters they are preparing for potential federal interference” — The Straits Times
“Trump ‘not trying to meddle’” — South China Morning Post
South China Morning Post, The Straits Times
Middle East1 outlet
Al Jazeera stresses bipartisan criticism, norms of DOJ independence and Trump's election denialism.
“critics have accused the Trump administration of wielding its prosecutorial powers for political gain.” — Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera
Left11 articles
-
Democrats ask judge to dismiss Trump administration’s challenge to Alaska Senate race
Critical Reports the Democrats' motion to dismiss and expert doubts about the DOJ's case.

-

-

-

Show 7 moreShow fewer
-

-

-

-

-

-
US Attorney General Todd Blanche defends Alaska Senate election lawsuit
Critical Emphasises Blanche's frustration, bipartisan criticism and likely illegality.

-

Centre5 articles
-
Trump Attacks Murkowski As Alaska Senate Fight Escalates: ‘Worst Senator’
Neutral Covers Trump's attack on Murkowski with ranked-choice explainer and polls.

-
South China Morning PostN · · via AP
Trump ‘not trying to meddle’ in Alaska election results by suing over Senate race: Blanche
Neutral AP copy on Blanche's defence, Trump's remarks and Peltola's crash.

-

Show 1 moreShow fewer
-
Mary Peltola Campaign Uses Trump’s Truth Social Post in Alaska Legal Filing
Neutral Reports the Peltola/DSCC filing citing Trump's posts.

Right5 articles
-

-
AG Blanche to CNN's Bash: You Are Not Being a Real Person, 'That Is Crazy'
Sympathetic Presents Blanche's retort to Bash with his fraud-and-confusion rationale.

-
Blanche declines to say if Trump ordered him to file Alaska election lawsuit
Mixed Reports Blanche's refusal to discuss Trump and notes the filing urges non-certification.

-

Show 1 moreShow fewer
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Reuters
Trump has no designs on taking over Alaska state election, US attorney-general says
Neutral Reuters copy on Blanche's denial with broader federal election-action context.
- 25 Oct 03:45 First NBC NewsLC Democrats ask judge to dismiss Trump administration’s challenge to Alaska Senate race
- 25 Oct 07:01 +3h 17m Hindustan TimesN Mary Peltola, the former Alaska congresswoman running for the US Senate
- 25 Oct 11:14 +7h 30m Raw StoryL Trump has midnight meltdown over 'Republicans' worst senator': 'You don't get any worse'
- 25 Oct 11:59 +8h 14m NewsweekN Trump Attacks Murkowski As Alaska Senate Fight Escalates: ‘Worst Senator’
- 25 Oct 13:49 +10h 4m Washington ExaminerR Trump rips Alaska’s ‘corrupt’ ranked choice voting in attack on Murkowski
- 25 Oct 14:58 +11h 14m The IndependentLC Trump’s AG Todd Blanche loses it when pressed about overturning elections results: ‘That’s crazy!’
- 25 Oct 15:26 +11h 42m BreitbartR AG Blanche to CNN's Bash: You Are Not Being a Real Person, 'That Is Crazy'
- 25 Oct 16:06 +12h 21m CBS NewsLC Transcript: Attorney General Todd Blanche on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 25, 2026
- 25 Oct 16:36 +12h 51m CBS NewsLC AG Blanche says DOJ is "doing our own research under the law" with Alaska ballot challenge
- 25 Oct 16:48 +13h 4m The GuardianLC Blanche defends DoJ’s pre-emptive suit to block Alaska Senate results certification
- 25 Oct 16:50 +13h 6m Raw StoryL 'Sit and weep': Experts blow up Todd Blanche's defense of DOJ 'election interference' case
- 25 Oct 17:13 +13h 29m Washington ExaminerR Blanche declines to say if Trump ordered him to file Alaska election lawsuit
- 25 Oct 17:38 +13h 54m CBS NewsLC Blanche says DOJ is "doing our own research" with Alaska challenge
- 25 Oct 18:28 +14h 43m Washington ExaminerR Trump worries Alaska voters ‘don’t know what incumbent means’ on ranked choice ballot
- 25 Oct 18:49 +15h 4m South China Morning PostN Trump ‘not trying to meddle’ in Alaska election results by suing over Senate race: Blanche via AP
- 25 Oct 18:55 +15h 11m Raw StoryL Trump accused of calling voters dumb with 'telling' comment: 'Way to insult good people'
- 25 Oct 19:29 +15h 45m The Straits TimesRC Trump has no designs on taking over Alaska state election, US attorney-general says via Reuters
- 25 Oct 21:41 +17h 56m Al JazeeraLC US Attorney General Todd Blanche defends Alaska Senate election lawsuit
- 25 Oct 23:14 +19h 29m NewsweekN Trump on Alaska Election: 'A Lot of People Don’t Know What Incumbent Means'
- 26 Oct 02:12 +22h 27m Raw StoryL 'Serious stuff': Expert alarmed as DOJ takes a swipe at Alaska's elections
- 26 Oct 08:23 +28h 38m NewsweekN Mary Peltola Campaign Uses Trump’s Truth Social Post in Alaska Legal Filing
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…