Education Department disputes report that student loans will be cut for low-earning degrees
A New Republic report said the Trump administration is banning loans for lower-paying majors. The Education Department says the rule only holds individual programs accountable for poor earnings outcomes.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
The Department of Education rejected a report that the Trump administration is seeking to bar students in certain degrees from federal loans, calling it "fake news" on X. NewsweekN ““This is fake news at its finest,” the Department of Education wrote on X” Read at Newsweek ↗ The department said it is not banning any program and that the rule holds colleges accountable for leaving students worse off than if they had never enrolled. NewsweekN ““First off, we’re not ‘banning’ any program. The federal government doesn’t set curriculum or programs,”” Read at Newsweek ↗ The New Republic had said students in lower-paying fields could lose access to loans, naming social work, art, religious studies, music, teaching assistance and cosmetology as likely to be most affected. NewsweekN “social work, art, religious studies, music, teaching assistance and cosmetology could be among the degrees most heavily affected” Read at Newsweek ↗
As described by Newsweek citing the Los Angeles Times, the rule, finalized in July, compares undergraduate graduates' median earnings four years after completion with those of working adults who hold only a high school diploma; graduate programs are compared with bachelor's degree holders. NewsweekN “comparing their graduates’ median earnings four years after completion with those of working adults of a similar age who hold only a high school diploma” Read at Newsweek ↗ The Los Angeles Times estimated about 5.2 percent of programs could fail, including roughly one-third of for-profit programs. NewsweekN “an estimated 5.2 percent of programs could fail, affecting programs attended by 4.2 percent of federal loan or grant recipients” Read at Newsweek ↗ Under Secretary Nicholas Kent said programs that cannot show graduates are better off should not be underwritten by taxpayers, citing rising defaults in a $1.7 trillion loan portfolio. NewsweekN “Amid rising rates of default and delinquency in the $1.7 trillion federal student loan portfolio” Read at Newsweek ↗
The Washington Examiner's opinion writer Brad Polumbo called the change minor, in the works since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of July 2025, and said the New Republic post drew more than 20 million views and condemnation from Democratic officials. Washington ExaminerR “A minor change to student loan policies has been in the works ever since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed into law in July 2025.”“receiving more than 20 million views” Read at Washington Examiner ↗ Citing AEI scholar Preston Cooper, he said fewer than 5% of undergraduate programs could lose eligibility and that the test applies program by program, not to whole majors. Washington ExaminerR “fewer than 5% of undergraduate degree programs could lose eligibility under the new rule” Read at Washington Examiner ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Reports the department's rebuttal of the New Republic report, with figures from the Los Angeles Times and a Texas earnings study.
- Emphasis
- Department statements, estimated share of failing programs, earnings data by field.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not include the reaction from Democratic officials or social media.
- Charged language
- “fake news at its finest”
- For example
-
“insisting that a new rule will instead “[hold] colleges accountable for leaving students worse off than if they never enrolled.”” — Newsweek
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Opinion piece presents the backlash as a hysterical overreaction to a minor, sensible rule and attacks the New Republic's reporting.
- Emphasis
- Online reaction, AEI's Preston Cooper, the low bar of the test, program-level application.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the estimated 5.2 percent overall or the graduate-program test, and gives little on critics' concerns about socially valuable low-paid professions.
- Charged language
- “meltdown”“wildly misleading”“hysterical discourse”“deranged journalists”
- For example
-
“So, the whole hysterical discourse over this topic is nothing short of absurd.” — Washington Examiner
What every side reports
- The rule restricts federal loan eligibility for programs whose graduates' earnings fall below a benchmark tied to high school graduates.
- Roughly 5% of programs are estimated to be affected.
- The department says it is not banning any programs.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the policy amounts to a ban on low-paying degrees
- Centre
- Newsweek reports the New Republic's characterisation and the department's rebuttal that no program is banned.
- Right
- The Washington Examiner opinion piece calls the New Republic's account "wildly misleading" and the change minor and commonsense.
Department of Education organisation
Says it is holding colleges accountable, not banning programs, and that loans should not fund programs that never pay off.
““Federal student loans are not a welfare program for failing college programs.” — Newsweek
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
Trump Administration Addresses Plan to Cut Student Loans for Some Degrees
Neutral Explains the dispute between the department and the New Republic with data and quotes from both sides.

Right1 article
-
Washington ExaminerR · · Opinion
Social media melts down over minor Trump policy change on student loans
Dismissive Opinion piece mocking the backlash and defending the rule as commonsense.

- 29 Sep 19:44 First NewsweekN Trump Administration Addresses Plan to Cut Student Loans for Some Degrees
- 1 Oct 00:35 +28h 51m Washington ExaminerR Social media melts down over minor Trump policy change on student loans Opinion
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.