Skip to content
Bramble

World

Egyptian court shuts Mada Masr and convicts editor Lina Attalah of operating without a licence

A Cairo court ordered the independent news site Mada Masr closed on 27 October after convicting editor-in-chief Lina Attalah of running it without a licence. She was fined 3 million Egyptian pounds and taken into custody pending payment or bail.

4 outlets · 1L · 1C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: The Straits Times
Image: The Media Line
Image: The Independent
Image: IJR

1 / 4

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2A Cairo court on Tuesday 27 October ordered the independent Egyptian news site Mada Masr closed after convicting its editor-in-chief, Lina Attalah, of running the site without a licence. Mixed · 2Attalah was fined 3 million Egyptian pounds (about $53,400 to $54,000), and the court ordered the outlet's equipment confiscated and took her into custody; Reuters reported this was pending bail, while The Media Line said pending payment of the fine. Mixed · 2Mada Masr said the court gave her the maximum penalty; The Media Line reported the fine was the maximum permitted under the 2018 law governing press and media operations.

Centre · 1Attalah's lawyer, Hassan al-Azhari, said the legal team intends to appeal, and lawyers said the judge refused requests for more time to examine evidence and prevented them from calling witnesses. Mixed · 2Mada Masr, founded in 2013, says it has sought a licence from the Supreme Council for Media Regulation repeatedly since 2018 without a reply, learned of a rejection only in 2022 when prosecutors raised the issue in an earlier case, and has had a latest application unanswered since 2023. Mixed · 2Egyptian authorities say the state is committed to freedom of expression but that media must operate within the law, respect national security and counter misinformation; the council has not commented on the case.

Right · 1Prosecutors referred Attalah to trial the previous Thursday; 119 rights groups and media outlets, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Committee to Protect Journalists, called the case an "unprecedented attack on press freedom", and US Senator Chris Van Hollen called the charges baseless. Centre · 1After the verdict, CPJ regional director Sara Qudah called it "a devastating blow to press freedom in Egypt" and urged Attalah's release. Mixed · 2Mada Masr has been blocked inside Egypt since 2017 but kept publishing; it says six cases have been brought against it and its journalists over six years, though rights groups say this is the first referred to trial.

Mixed · 2The case follows the September arrest of journalists at the fact-checking outlet Matsaddash (spelled Matsadaash by The Media Line); Reuters said the entire newsroom was arrested, The Media Line said six journalists were detained. Right · 1Reuters also noted that in September the US waived rights conditions, which include protecting media freedoms, on part of the roughly $1.3 billion in military aid it sends Egypt each year.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Straight news report of the verdict, with emphasis on the legal process and Attalah's lawyers' complaints about the trial.
Emphasis
Defence complaints that the judge refused more time and barred witnesses; the planned appeal; the CPJ reaction; that a false-news accusation was not part of the referral.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the 119-group statement, Senator Van Hollen or US military aid.
Charged language
“a devastating blow to press freedom in Egypt”
For example
“Lawyers said the judge refused requests for more time to examine evidence and prevented them from calling witnesses.” — The Media Line

Right2 outlets

Framing
Reuters wire copy run by The Straits Times presents the verdict as a test case for independent media, with international criticism and the political context of US aid.
Emphasis
Rights groups' and US Senator Van Hollen's condemnation, Mada Masr's international profile and the US waiver on aid conditions.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report the defence's complaints about trial procedure or plans to appeal.
Charged language
“unprecedented attack on press freedom”“journalism is not a crime”
For example
“a group of 119 rights groups and media outlets, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Committee to Protect Journalists, called the case an "unprecedented attack on press freedom".” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…