EU charges TikTok over 'rabbit hole' effect of its For You recommender feed
On 6 November the European Commission issued preliminary findings that TikTok breached the Digital Services Act through the "rabbit hole" effect of its For You feed. TikTok could face a fine of up to 6% of global annual turnover.
1 / 3
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2On 6 November the European Commission charged TikTok with breaching the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) because of the "rabbit hole" effect of its recommender system, which keeps users watching a constant stream of similar videos. CNAN “EU tech regulators charged social media platform TikTok on Friday with breaching the bloc's online content rules due to the so-called "rabbit hole" effect of its recommender system” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “Brussels accused TikTok of violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) over the “harmful ‘rabbit holes’ effect”” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2The charges take the form of preliminary findings. The Commission said TikTok failed to put in place proportionate, reasonable and effective mitigation measures, and did not "adequately assess" how its algorithm put users' wellbeing at risk. CNAN “issued charges known as preliminary findings to TikTok after the company failed to implement proportionate, reasonable and effective mitigation measures” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “TikTok did not “adequately assess” how its recommendation algorithm put users’ wellbeing at risk” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2The Commission said endless, repeated exposure to content about sadness, isolation or body image can harm mental health. It cited possible increased feelings of sadness or anxiety, body dissatisfaction, lower self-esteem, or worsening of existing eating disorders. CNAN “endless and repeated exposure to content about sadness, isolation or body image can have a detrimental impact on users' mental health” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “increased feelings of sadness or anxiety, body dissatisfaction, lower self-esteem, or worsening of existing eating disorders” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Centre · 1EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen said: "Every time a user scrolls or likes a video on TikTok, the algorithm serves more of the same leading users down rabbit holes they cannot easily escape from." CNAN “"Every time a user scrolls or likes a video on TikTok, the algorithm serves more of the same leading users down rabbit holes they cannot easily escape from,"” Read at CNA ↗ Right · 1AFP, carried by The Straits Times, reported that the algorithm keeps suggesting similar videos even when users say they dislike certain content. The Commission found the "not interested" button "may not be enough to change the content feed". It said TikTok's changes so far were not effective and called for more radical design changes. The Straits TimesRC “Even when users tell TikTok they do not like certain content, the platform’s algorithm continues to suggest similar videos.”“TikTok has made some changes to mitigate the risks but they were not effective, the EU said, demanding more radical design changes.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Mixed · 2The Commission said TikTok needs to change the design of its For You feed and rely more on users' explicit preferences. It also wants more accessible and usable user controls and regular testing of the algorithm. AFP also listed disabling viewing time as a signal for recommending content. CNAN “TikTok needs to change the design of its 'For You' feed algorithm and should rely more on users' explicit preferences” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “Disable viewing time as an indicator to recommend content.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Mixed · 2TikTok can now access the EU's files and defend itself. If the findings are confirmed, the Commission can fine it up to 6% of global annual turnover. CNA said TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance risks such a fine next year unless the issue is resolved. The Straits TimesRC “TikTok can now access the EU’s files and defend itself against the accusations” Read at The Straits Times ↗ CNAN “TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance risks a fine next year of up to 6 per cent of its global annual turnover unless it can resolve the issue.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2The case is part of a broader EU investigation into TikTok. In February regulators charged the company over addictive design, inadequate child protection and limited researcher access to public data, and TikTok called those findings "categorically false". AFP also reported that the EU accused TikTok in July of exposing children to risks such as cyberbullying and predatory behaviour. CNAN “TikTok said at the time that those preliminary findings were”“EU regulators charged TikTok in February over what regulators said were the platform's addictive designs” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “after it accused the company in July of exposing children to risks like cyberbullying and predatory behaviour” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1A senior EU official told AFP that the February findings focused on features such as notifications, while the November view concerns the algorithm itself. The official admitted the EU was targeting TikTok's engagement-based business model. The Straits TimesRC “A senior EU official said the February findings on TikTok focused on features like notifications, whereas the view on Nov 6 was about the algorithm itself.”“the official admitted the EU was targeting its engagement-based business model” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Mixed · 2The Commission is also investigating rabbit hole effects in Meta's Facebook and Instagram recommendation systems. It told Meta in July to change their "addictive design". Concern that platforms harm children's mental health has led some governments to impose or consider bans for underage users, and the EU is planning to ban under-13s from social media. In the US, TikTok avoided a September trial by agreeing to pay Alabama at least US$100 million and to apply time limits for teens. CNAN “The Commission is separately investigating so-called rabbit hole effects caused by Meta Platforms' Facebook and Instagram recommendation systems.” Read at CNA ↗ The Straits TimesRC “TikTok in September avoided a trial after agreeing to pay Alabama at least US$100 million”“plans to ban children under 13 from social media, and permit only limited, supervised access until the age of 15” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Centre · 1The coverage includes no TikTok response to the new charges. CNAN “TikTok said at the time that those preliminary findings were” Read at CNA ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre3 outlets
- Framing
- Wire-style regulatory news report that leads with the charge and the fine exposure for ByteDance, placed in the context of pressure on social media over children's mental health.
- Emphasis
- The legal basis, the fine, Virkkunen's quote, the February charges and TikTok's earlier denial, and the parallel Meta probe.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not report the EU's finding that the 'not interested' button is ineffective, nor the official's remark about targeting the engagement-based business model.
- For example
-
“TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance risks a fine next year of up to 6 per cent of its global annual turnover unless it can resolve the issue.” — CNA
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- AFP copy carried by The Straits Times, framed as the EU ordering TikTok to change a 'harmful' feed, within a wider EU child-protection drive.
- Emphasis
- Specific design remedies, the EU's view that TikTok's changes were ineffective, the senior official's remark on the engagement-based business model, the planned under-13 ban, and the Alabama settlement.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the Commission's separate probe into Meta's rabbit hole effects. Gives no TikTok response, including its earlier 'categorically false' denial.
- Charged language
- “harmful”“ramped up its efforts”
- For example
-
“The EU told TikTok on Nov 6 to change the “harmful” design of its personalised For You feed or risk large fines under the bloc’s digital content rules.” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- On 6 November the European Commission issued preliminary findings that TikTok breached the Digital Services Act through the 'rabbit hole' effect of its For You feed.
- Fines can reach 6% of global annual turnover.
- The Commission wants more reliance on users' explicit preferences, more usable controls and regular algorithm testing.
- The charges follow earlier EU action against TikTok in February.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether TikTok's existing changes are adequate
- Centre
- Says TikTok failed to implement proportionate, reasonable and effective mitigation measures.
- Right
- Reports the EU's view that TikTok's changes were not effective, so more radical redesign is needed.
European Union organisation
The Commission says TikTok's feed pushes users down rabbit holes, that TikTok did not adequately assess or mitigate the risks, and that it must redesign the algorithm.
“"Today's preliminary findings show again that TikTok needs to step up its efforts to protect users' well-being, including those of minors,"” — CNA
“TikTok has made some changes to mitigate the risks but they were not effective, the EU said” — The Straits Times
TikTok organisation
No response to these charges is reported. Over the February findings it called them "categorically false" and said it would challenge them.
“TikTok said at the time that those preliminary findings were” — CNA
ByteDance organisation
CNA describes ByteDance, TikTok's Chinese owner, as facing a fine of up to 6% of global annual turnover next year unless it resolves the issue. No statement from ByteDance is reported.
“TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance risks a fine next year of up to 6 per cent of its global annual turnover unless it can resolve the issue.” — CNA
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre3 articles
-
CNAN ·
EU charges TikTok over harmful algorithmic 'rabbit hole' effects
Neutral Straight regulatory report on the charge, the fine exposure and the broader EU investigation into TikTok and Meta.
-
Right1 article
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via AFP
EU tells TikTok to change ‘harmful’ For You feed
Neutral AFP copy presenting the EU as demanding design changes and widening a child-safety push, with detail on remedies and the engagement-based model.
- 6 Nov 11:02 First CNAN EU charges TikTok over harmful algorithmic 'rabbit hole' effects
- 6 Nov 12:13 +1h 10m The Straits TimesRC EU tells TikTok to change ‘harmful’ For You feed via AFP
- 6 Nov 13:00 +1h 58m Hindustan TimesN TikTok faces EU charges over 'rabbit hole' algorithm, risks 6% global revenue fine
- 6 Nov 13:01 +1h 59m Anadolu AgencyN TikTok’s feed can steer users toward harmful content, preliminary EU findings show
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…