Skip to content
Bramble

Technology

EU court adviser recommends dismissing TikTok's challenge to gatekeeper status

Advocate General Andrea Biondi advised the EU's Court of Justice on 15 October to reject ByteDance's (TikTok's) appeal against its Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation. The non-binding opinion backs the European Commission; judges are expected to rule in the coming months.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: CNA
Image: The Straits Times

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2An adviser to the Court of Justice of the European Union recommended on Thursday 15 October that TikTok lose its challenge to its "gatekeeper" status under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), backing the regulators. Centre · 1Advocate General Andrea Biondi said in his opinion: "The Court should dismiss the action brought by ByteDance (TikTok) against the decision of the Commission designating it as a gatekeeper under the Digital Markets Act." Mixed · 2He endorsed the ruling of the lower tribunal, the General Court, which rejected TikTok's challenge in 2024, saying it made no legal errors and that the fact that users also use other social networks does not, in itself, show TikTok is not an important gateway.

Centre · 1The case, C-627/24 P Bytedance v Commission, is the first involving the DMA to reach the Court of Justice, and technology companies are watching it for clues on whether Europe's courts will reinforce or limit regulators' efforts to boost competition and expand consumer choice. Centre · 1The opinion is non-binding, but judges, who are expected to rule in the coming months, follow such opinions in around four out of five cases. Mixed · 2The DMA imposes strict obligations on designated gatekeepers, and breaches can bring fines of up to 10% of a company's annual global turnover. Other designated gatekeepers include Alphabet's Google, Meta Platforms, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Booking.com, and Meta is separately challenging the designation of its Messenger and Marketplace services.

Mixed · 2TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Reports the opinion as a setback for TikTok and a test of EU efforts to curb Big Tech, using the same text as the Reuters report; a shorter earlier version gave the bare news.
Emphasis
Biondi's quoted recommendation, the case number, and the fact that judges usually follow such opinions.
Leaves out or plays down
No TikTok or ByteDance position beyond noting no immediate comment.
Charged language
“Setback for TikTok”
For example
“backing regulators in a closely watched test of the bloc's efforts to curb Big Tech's power.” — CNA
“Judges, who will rule in the coming months, usually follow four out of five such non-binding recommendations.” — CNA

Right1 outlet

Framing
Reuters copy carried by The Straits Times under the same 'setback' headline, with a standfirst on the obligations and fines TikTok would face.
Emphasis
The strict obligations and fines of up to 10% of global turnover.
Leaves out or plays down
No TikTok position beyond noting no immediate comment; the standfirst's conditional wording ("If designated") is looser than the article, which says TikTok is already designated.
Charged language
“Setback for TikTok”
For example
“If designated as a gatekeeper, TikTok will be subjected to strict obligations, failing which may result in fines up to 10% of its annual global turnover.” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…