Skip to content
Bramble

World

European Parliament votes 381-167 urging EU action on Muslim Brotherhood-linked terror listings

The European Parliament passed a resolution on Thursday 8 October 2026 urging the EU to list people and groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorists and to counter its influence. The Parliament cannot decide this itself; the matter goes to the Council.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The National
Image: JNS

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The European Parliament on Thursday 8 October 2026 passed a resolution backing measures to counter the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood, including listing people and organisations linked to it as terrorists, by 381 votes to 167. Right · 1JNS reported 15 abstentions. Centre · 1The resolution asks member states to provide information enabling an assessment of the Brotherhood's leaders and structures and whether they should be classed as terrorists, and asks the European Commission for a comprehensive overview of any EU funds awarded to associates of the Brotherhood.

Right · 1It also calls for a joint strategy against what it describes as "Islamist infiltration and Muslim Brotherhood networks", including a common approach to spotting "double messaging", support for Muslim intellectuals and activists who publicly back democracy, cutting off public funding to Islamic fundamentalists and greater scrutiny of civil society and youth organisations. Centre · 1The text describes the Brotherhood as "a political project based on the primacy of religious norms over common law, which is incompatible with democratic principles, the rule of law and equality between citizens". Right · 1JNS reported that the centre-right European People's Party, the Parliament's largest group, drafted the resolution, that the European Conservatives and Reformists had also pushed for the vote, and that left-wing groups opposed it from the outset and voted against.

Centre · 1The EPP said the EU "must never fund Islamists"; its MEP Celine Imart said political Islam as an ideology must not be conflated with Islam as a faith, and that where rules allow the Council should list individuals and organisations linked to the Brotherhood as terrorist entities. Mixed · 2The Parliament has no independent decision-making power over such listings and can only pressure other EU institutions; the matter now goes to the European Council, and JNS noted there is no unified stance among member states on the Brotherhood. Right · 1The vote followed a Wednesday debate on "countering Islamist entryism and the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood network".

Centre · 1The Brotherhood is outlawed in several Middle East countries including the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Egypt; the US has designated certain branches, and the French parliament passed a resolution in January urging the EU to list it. Right · 1JNS added that earlier this year the Trump administration designated branches in Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon as terror organisations, while Qatar and Turkey, hubs of Brotherhood activity, have so far been spared.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Straight news report on the resolution's content and limits, with Middle East context on bans of the Brotherhood.
Emphasis
The Parliament's lack of independent power, the funding review and the EPP's statements, including the faith versus political Islam distinction.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report abstentions, who drafted the resolution or which groups opposed it.
For example
“The European Parliament does not have independent decision-making power but can apply pressure to other EU institutions to take action.” — The National

Right1 outlet

Framing
Reports the vote as a step toward an EU terror listing, with the Trump administration's designations as context.
Emphasis
Political-group alignments, the 'double messaging' concern, the organisers' language about infiltration, and Qatar and Turkey being spared.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not state that the Parliament lacks binding power, or mention the funding-overview request to the Commission or the EPP's distinction between faith and ideology.
Charged language
“Islamist infiltration”“double messaging”“protect the European way of life”
For example
“Organizers framed the issue as “a calculated strategy of infiltration in public institutions and civil society, pursuing a fundamentalist agenda that claims adherence to democratic values while working to undermine them.”” — JNS