Skip to content
Bramble

Entertainment

Everest: The Other Side documentary draws critical reviews over ethics of the climb

Reviews of the National Geographic-backed documentary Everest: The Other Side, about Jim Morrison and Hilaree Nelson's bid to ski Everest's north face, praise its imagery but question its handling of risk and ethics.

2 outlets · 2L · 0C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: The A.V. Club

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Left · 2Everest: The Other Side is a National Geographic-backed documentary, with some showings in Imax, about mountaineers Jim Morrison and Hilaree Nelson, who set out to be the first people to ski down Everest's north face. Left · 2It is co-directed by Jimmy Chin and Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi, the Free Solo directors, who appear on screen to discuss their own feelings on risk and reward. Left · 1The A.V. Club's Corey Atad writes that the film is really about Nelson's death: in 2022, after the couple reached the summit of Manaslu in Nepal, Nelson skied off and set off a small avalanche that swept her away, and the footage is in the film.

Left · 1According to the A.V. Club, the project continued, with Chin taking Nelson's place on the Everest climbing team; it notes that Chin and Vasarhelyi, who were married at the time, divorced in 2025, the year of the expedition. Left · 1The Guardian's Leslie Felperin says neither climber adequately explains why they take such risks, and that the film leaves moral questions hanging over Nelson's two teenage sons and Morrison, who is not their biological father. Left · 2Both reviewers praise the visuals: the Guardian calls the cinematography "pin-sharp" thanks to advanced lenses and drones, though it finds the fluorescent gear distracting, and the A.V. Club cites the film's "staggering images".

Left · 1The A.V. Club is more critical of the film's honesty, saying Morrison's self-justifications are never seriously interrogated, that a late reveal that Morrison had earlier lost his wife and two children in a plane crash is "unseemly", and that the film does not seriously address Everest's crowding, treatment of Sherpa or environmental damage. Left · 1The Guardian also notes the film's footage of Nepalese guides, who it says have far fewer career choices than the western tourists they assist. Left · 1The A.V. Club review sets the film beside Tenzing, a biopic of the 1953 Everest expedition arriving the same month, which it views more favourably.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
Both left-leaning outlets run critical reviews that praise the spectacle but focus on the ethics of risking life and family for an Everest ski descent.
Emphasis
Moral questions about risk, family and the lack of explanation; the A.V. Club adds Nelson's death, the film's candour and Everest's commercial and Sherpa issues.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither gives the film's release details or the filmmakers' or Morrison's responses to the criticism.
Charged language
“unseemly”“tricky moral questions”“murkier affair”
For example
“But it’s safe to say the ethics aired here are a far murkier affair.” — The Guardian
“Its deployment is unseemly” — The A.V. Club

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…