Ex-OpenAI researchers and AI firms give MPs evidence on AI risk and regulation
At a Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee session on Tuesday, former OpenAI staff warned of high industry risk-taking, while OpenAI and Anthropic backed binding rules and Google DeepMind and Meta did not. UK officials said the current testing regime is voluntary.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 1Daniel Kokotajlo, a former OpenAI researcher, told the Business, Innovation, Science and Trade (BIST) Committee on Tuesday that "the risk tolerance across the industry is catastrophically high". City A.M.RC ““I would say that the risk tolerance across the industry is catastrophically high”, he told MPs.” Read at City A.M. ↗ Right · 1Kokotajlo said he quit OpenAI after concluding it "would not behave responsibly around the creation of this technology". He also said he felt pressure to "mince my words a bit" in public communications and that some internal research and forecasts were stopped from being published, according to City A.M. City A.M.RC ““I came to believe that OpenAI, in fact, would not behave responsibly around the creation of this technology”, he said.”““I did feel pressure to mince my words a bit in my public communications”” Read at City A.M. ↗ Left · 1Wired reported that Kokotajlo also said "I don't think the companies can be trusted to self-regulate". WiredLC ““I don’t think the companies can be trusted to self-regulate,” he told MPs.” Read at Wired ↗
Mixed · 2Steven Adler, who left OpenAI in late 2024, said there had been resistance inside the company to calling its technology "dangerous", though he acknowledged its culture may have changed since. He told MPs he was "not confident in the safety culture across the industry" and urged governments to "set the ceiling" on the risk companies can impose. City A.M.RC “Adler, who left OpenAI in late 2024, acknowledged that its internal culture may have changed since his departure.”““What I hope governments will do is they will help set the ceiling essentially on how much risk these companies can impose”” Read at City A.M. ↗ WiredLC “said he was “not confident in the safety culture across the industry.”” Read at Wired ↗ Right · 1Geoffrey Irving, a former researcher at OpenAI, Anthropic and the UK's AI Security Institute (AISI), said capability advances were far outpacing safety work. Asked about his earlier estimate of a 50 per cent chance of advanced AI destroying humanity, he said a "coin flip is roughly the right model to have"; City A.M. noted this is a personal assessment rather than an established scientific probability. City A.M.RC ““We are still undergoing very, very rapid capability advances without corresponding advances in safety””“The figure reflects his personal assessment of a hypothetical future risk, rather than an established scientific probability.” Read at City A.M. ↗ Left · 1Irving said the labs believe they are locked in a race that governments will not interrupt and that they cannot leave. "Both of those are false," he said. "They could just stop." WiredLC ““Both of those are false,” he said. “They could just stop.”” Read at Wired ↗
Left · 1The session also heard from four frontier AI firms, four former staff and senior civil servants. Anthropic's head of Europe, Liam Booth-Smith, said "the rules should be binding" and that voluntary commitments are not enough. WiredLC “held an evidence session on Tuesday with appearances from four frontier AI firms, four former staff of the firms turned whistleblowers and senior British civil servants.”““The rules should be binding,” Anthropic’s head of Europe Liam Booth-Smith told the committee” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 1OpenAI vice president Tom Duff Gordon backed a statutory framework and an international convention, saying "there should be some elements that should be mandatory", starting with incident reporting. WiredLC “Duff Gordon said “there should be some elements that should be mandatory,” starting with incident reporting.” Read at Wired ↗ Left · 1Google DeepMind's Owen Larter said the focus should be on standards, and Meta's Rob Sherman pointed to existing regulators, telling MPs they were "not writing on a blank page". WiredLC “Google DeepMind’s Owen Larter said: “Focus on the standards is what we would be doing.””“they were “not writing on a blank page.”” Read at Wired ↗
Left · 1Civil servants told the committee the current system is voluntary. AISI director Henry de Zoete said the institute relies on company and foreign-government cooperation for access and cannot stop a release, and Cabinet Office top civil servant Cat Little answered "At the moment, yes, it is" when asked if the regime was voluntary. WiredLC “Cat Little, the top civil servant at the Cabinet Office, which houses AISI, was pressed on whether the whole regime was voluntary. “At the moment, yes, it is,” she said.”“de Zoete acknowledged AISI had no ability to prevent them from doing so.” Read at Wired ↗ Mixed · 2British access to models runs through Washington: OpenAI's Duff Gordon said it provides models pre-deployment to the US counterpart CAISI and will continue with AISI as long as the US government allows, and Booth-Smith said Anthropic could not initially give AISI full unrestricted access to Mythos 5.1, which he called "a question for the US government". He added that AISI now has access, and City A.M. reported Washington restored UK access after a temporary restriction. WiredLC ““We unfortunately were not able to provide full unrestricted access to [Mythos 5.1] to UK AISI at that time ... That’s a question for the US government,”” Read at Wired ↗ City A.M.RC “Washington restored the UK’s access to advanced American AI models for pre-release safety testing, following a temporary restriction” Read at City A.M. ↗ Left · 1Committee chair Liam Byrne told Wired the aim was to show "that you couldn't rely on voluntary self-regulation" and to expose differences between some of the wealthiest firms. He said the committee would examine the UK's path as a middle power and wants ministers to use Britain's coming G20 presidency to seek an international convention not dependent on the current White House. WiredLC “to show “that you couldn’t rely on voluntary self-regulation.””““The G20 presidency will outlive the US presidency of Trump,” he said.” Read at Wired ↗
Left · 1Nearby, MI5 director Ken McCallum used his annual threat update to name AI's potential to change the stakes on bioweapons as the misuse case to which he attaches greatest weight, though "not yet realized". WiredLC ““Not yet realized, but the misuse case to which I’d attach greatest weight, is AI’s potential to change the stakes on existing or even new bioweapons,”” Read at Wired ↗ Right · 1City A.M. added context that AI minister Kanishka Narayan warned on Monday that a major breach of Britain's cyber defences was likely inevitable, and that Anthropic warned its models may soon self-replicate and that its IPO filings reportedly cite "existential risks to humanity". It said OpenAI and Anthropic had been contacted for comment. City A.M.RC “AI minister Kanishka Narayan’s warning on Monday that a major breach of Britain’s cyber defences was likely to be inevitable.”“OpenAI and Anthropic have been contacted for comment.” Read at City A.M. ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Wired leads on OpenAI and Anthropic asking to be regulated, and on the split with Google DeepMind and Meta, setting it against a largely voluntary UK regime.
- Emphasis
- Company positions on statutory rules, officials' admissions about voluntary testing, US dependence, and committee chair Liam Byrne's comments.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives less space to Kokotajlo's allegations of pressure to soften public statements and to Irving's 50 per cent estimate.
- Charged language
- “Regulate Us”“whistleblowers”
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- City A.M. leads on the former OpenAI researcher's warning of 'catastrophically high' risk, framing the hearing as a test of whether tech giants can regulate themselves.
- Emphasis
- Whistleblower testimony, existential-risk figures and wider UK AI security news.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not report the firms' own positions on binding regulation or the officials' admission that the regime is voluntary.
- Charged language
- “catastrophically high”
What every side reports
- The BIST Committee took evidence on Tuesday 13 October from former OpenAI staff including Daniel Kokotajlo and Steven Adler, and from Geoffrey Irving.
- Kokotajlo and Adler, both ex-OpenAI, expressed doubts about industry safety culture and self-regulation.
- Executives from frontier AI firms and senior officials also gave evidence the same day.
Daniel Kokotajlo person
Says industry risk tolerance is catastrophically high, that OpenAI would not act responsibly, and that companies cannot be trusted to self-regulate.
““I would say that the risk tolerance across the industry is catastrophically high”, he told MPs.” — City A.M.
““I don’t think the companies can be trusted to self-regulate,” he told MPs.” — Wired
Anthropic organisation
Its head of Europe told MPs the rules should be binding and voluntary commitments are not enough; City A.M. says it was contacted for comment.
““consistently believed that there should be binding rules on companies and that voluntary commitments are not enough.”” — Wired
OpenAI organisation
Its vice president backed a statutory framework with some mandatory elements starting with incident reporting; former staff criticised its culture, though Adler said it may have changed.
““We don’t think basing everything on voluntary commitments for frontier risk is a good long-term plan,” he said.” — Wired
“Adler, who left OpenAI in late 2024, acknowledged that its internal culture may have changed since his departure.” — City A.M.
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee organisation
Chair Liam Byrne says the session showed voluntary self-regulation cannot be relied on and that risks are multiplying faster than the safety regime can control.
““The risks,” he added, “are multiplying faster than our safety regime can control.”” — Wired
Left1 article
-
WiredLC ·
OpenAI and Anthropic Tell British Lawmakers: Regulate Us
Critical Presents the hearing as exposing a split among AI firms and a toothless, voluntary UK regime.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
AI firms taking ‘catastrophically high’ risks, ex-OpenAI researcher warns MPs
Alarmist Leads on a whistleblower's warning of existential-scale risk and sets it alongside other UK AI security alarms.

- 13 Oct 15:49 First City A.M.RC AI firms taking ‘catastrophically high’ risks, ex-OpenAI researcher warns MPs
- 13 Oct 20:35 +4h 46m WiredLC OpenAI and Anthropic Tell British Lawmakers: Regulate Us
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…