FDA's National Priority Voucher programme stalled since Makary's exit, sources say
A Reuters report says the FDA has effectively shelved the Commissioner's National Priority Voucher programme launched in June 2025, with no new vouchers since Marty Makary left in May. HHS says the pilot is ongoing.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2The FDA has shelved the fast-track drug review initiative that former Commissioner Marty Makary launched during the Trump administration, according to a Reuters report carried by The Independent and relayed by STAT. The IndependentLC “According to internal documents and six sources familiar with the matter, the initiative has now been shelved.” Read at The Independent ↗ STATN “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has shelved the fast-track drug review initiative launched during the Trump administration by former Commissioner Marty Makary, Reuters reports.” Read at STAT ↗ Mixed · 2The Commissioner's National Priority Voucher programme began in June 2025 and aimed to cut review times to as little as one to two months for therapies addressing national priorities, such as urgent unmet health needs. The IndependentLC “Its aim was to compress drug review timelines to as little as one to two months for therapies addressing national priorities, such as urgent unmet health needs.” Read at The Independent ↗ STATN “Launched in June 2025, the Commissioner's National Priority Voucher program aimed to slash drug review timelines” Read at STAT ↗ Mixed · 2No new drugs have received a voucher since Makary left the agency in May, and the executive council of political appointees that oversaw drug reviews and had a central role in speeding approvals has gone dormant, internal documents show. The IndependentLC “No new drugs have been given a voucher under the FDA's fast-track review program since Marty Makary left the agency in May.” Read at The Independent ↗ STATN “has gone dormant.” Read at STAT ↗
Left · 1Of the 22 drugs given a voucher, a dozen have been approved, including five since Makary's departure, and for several the programme sped approval by eight months or more. The IndependentLC “Of the 22 drugs given a voucher, a dozen have been approved, including five since Makary's departure.” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 1One source said FDA leadership told companies the agency is not moving forward with the programme but is keeping applications open, and that submitted applications do not advance. Rich Danker, a former HHS assistant secretary, said it is being quietly phased out. The IndependentLC “FDA leadership told companies the agency is not moving forward with the program but is keeping applications open.”“said the initiative is quietly being phased out” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 1HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said the pilot is ongoing and that the FDA is reviewing feedback from a June public hearing to refine the framework; the agency did not answer questions about the departure of the programme's lead or a new coordinator. The IndependentLC “HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said the pilot is ongoing and that the FDA is reviewing feedback from a June public hearing on it to refine the framework.” Read at The Independent ↗
Mixed · 2Critics, including regulatory experts, argued the programme risked preferential treatment for companies meeting President Trump's demands, such as lower drug prices; awards went to companies that struck pricing deals with the White House, such as Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, and Merck KGaA received a voucher for Pergoveris under its deal. Lilly, Novo and Merck KGaA declined to comment. The IndependentLC “Critics noted awards granted to companies that reached drug-pricing deals with the White House, such as Eli Lilly LLY.N and Novo Nordisk NOVob.CO.” Read at The Independent ↗ STATN “critics pointed to possible preferential treatment for companies meeting demands of President Trump, such as offering drugs at lower prices.” Read at STAT ↗ Left · 1At a June public hearing, former FDA executive Peter Lurie criticised the programme for ceding review decisions to political appointees, risking safety with compressed timelines and lacking transparency; University of Pennsylvania professor Holly Fernandez Lynch called it "the worst of both worlds". The IndependentLC “Holly Fernandez Lynch, a health policy professor at the University of Pennsylvania, described the program as “the worst of both worlds,””“criticized the program for ceding review decisions to political appointees” Read at The Independent ↗ Left · 1The council included Tracy Beth Hoeg and Vinay Prasad, who have both left the FDA. Hoeg repeatedly raised safety objections to Sanofi's Tzield at three council meetings between October 2025 and April and withheld approval; staff granted accelerated approval in June after she and Makary left. Hoeg told Reuters she is concerned about children taking the drug, while Sanofi said the FDA concluded its benefits outweighed the risks. The IndependentLC “At three separate executive council meetings between October 2025 and April, she repeatedly raised safety objections.”“Sanofi said the FDA concluded the drug's benefits outweighed the risks and detailed its scientific rationale in a public memo.” Read at The Independent ↗
Left · 1Documents show neither of the two newest voucher drugs cleared since Makary left, Merck's cholesterol pill Lipfendra and Revolution Medicines' pancreatic cancer drug Rasonque, was vetted by the council. Merck KGaA's Pergoveris remains unapproved three months after the FDA accepted its final application. For the nine drugs still in the programme, career scientists have resumed overseeing review timelines, two sources said. The IndependentLC “documents show neither was vetted by the executive council.”“For the nine drugs still in the program, FDA career scientists have resumed overseeing review timelines, two sources said.” Read at The Independent ↗ Mixed · 2The FDA has had no commissioner since May. STAT separately noted that the Senate health committee has scheduled a vote for 18 November on Heidi Overton's nomination as commissioner, with chair Bill Cassidy undecided. The IndependentLC “which has been without a commissioner since May.” Read at The Independent ↗ STATN “The vote is set for Nov. 18” Read at STAT ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Leads with 'quietly shelves' and 'agency chaos', placing the stall within infighting and a leadership vacuum at the FDA.
- Emphasis
- Political influence concerns, critics' quotes, the Tzield dispute and the dormant council; includes the HHS denial that the pilot has ended.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives little on how the programme's supporters viewed its benefits beyond the faster approvals noted.
- Charged language
- “quietly shelves”“agency chaos”“flagship”
- For example
-
“the internal chaos, infighting, and lack of steady leadership that has plagued the FDA” — The Independent
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- A short newsletter item summarising the Reuters finding alongside other pharma news, including the Overton nomination vote.
- Emphasis
- Core finding: no new vouchers since Makary left and the council gone dormant; critics' preferential-treatment concern.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the HHS statement that the pilot is ongoing, the voucher counts and the named critics.
- For example
-
“No new drugs have gotten a voucher since Makary’s departure” — STAT
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The FDA's National Priority Voucher programme was launched in June 2025 under Commissioner Marty Makary.
- No new vouchers have been awarded since Makary's departure.
- The executive council of political appointees overseeing reviews has gone dormant.
- Critics raised concerns about preferential treatment for companies meeting President Trump's demands.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the programme has been shelved
- Left
- The Independent's report says, citing internal documents and six sources, that it has been shelved or is being quietly phased out; HHS says the pilot is ongoing.
- Centre
- STAT relays Reuters that the FDA has shelved it, without the HHS rebuttal in the visible text.
Food and Drug Administration organisation
Through HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard, says the pilot is ongoing and feedback from the June hearing is being reviewed to refine the framework; it did not answer questions on the lead's departure.
“HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said the pilot is ongoing” — The Independent
Marty Makary person
Launched the programme in June 2025 and left the agency in May; the reports present the programme's stall as following his exit.
“since Marty Makary left the agency in May” — The Independent
Left1 article
-
FDA quietly shelves Trump’s flagship drug fast-track program amid reports of agency chaos
Critical Presents the stalled voucher scheme as a symptom of FDA turmoil and political influence, with critics prominent and HHS's denial included.
Centre1 article
-
STATN ·
Neutral Brief digest relaying Reuters' finding in plain terms next to other pharma items.

Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 12 Nov 12:19 First The IndependentLC FDA quietly shelves Trump’s flagship drug fast-track program amid reports of agency chaos
- 12 Nov 14:14 +1h 55m STATN STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about FDA shelving fast-track review, a Canadian importer arrested, and more
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…