Skip to content
Bramble

Entertainment

Judge dismisses most of Baldwin's civil rights claims against Rust prosecutors

U.S. District Judge Kea Riggs ruled that prosecutors in the Rust case are shielded by absolute prosecutorial immunity, while calling the alleged misconduct a "very disturbing picture". Some claims against special prosecutor Kari Morrissey survive.

2 outlets · 2L · 0C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Variety
Image: The Hollywood Reporter

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

On Wednesday 30 September 2026, U.S. District Judge Kea Riggs threw out much of Alec Baldwin's civil rights lawsuit against prosecutors in the Rust case, finding they are entitled to prosecutorial immunity. Riggs said the allegations paint a "very disturbing picture" but wrote that it is sometimes better to leave a dishonest prosecutor's wrongs unredressed than to expose prosecutors to constant fear of retaliation. She added that absolute immunity is worthwhile only if it applies to hard cases, occasionally shielding acts of gross misconduct.

Baldwin sued over the prosecution that followed the 2021 accidental shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. His involuntary manslaughter trial ended in July 2024 when the charge was dismissed after the judge learned special prosecutor Kari Morrissey had withheld evidence from the defense. He also alleged false information was given to the grand jury, two firearms reports were not disclosed, and an unlawful gun enhancement was filed. The defendants were Morrissey, Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies and Andrea Reeb, who withdrew as special prosecutor. Some claims survive: the state did not seek to dismiss allegations about Morrissey's statements to the media or her agreement to log a cache of bullets under a separate case number, which Variety says functionally hid them from the defense.

Baldwin's separate claims against Santa Fe County and sheriff's investigators remain pending, as the judge has yet to rule on the county's motions to dismiss. A representative for Baldwin did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hollywood Reporter.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left2 outlets

Framing
Both trade outlets report the ruling as a legal setback for Baldwin, leading on immunity while quoting the judge's acknowledgement of possible misconduct.
Emphasis
Variety stresses procedural detail, including surviving claims and the pending county motions. The Hollywood Reporter stresses the evidence-withholding history and the judge's findings about Morrissey.
Leaves out or plays down
The Hollywood Reporter does not mention the surviving claims or the pending motions against Santa Fe County. Variety does not mention the upcoming documentary or seeking comment from Baldwin's representative.
Charged language
“very disturbing picture”“gross misconduct”“out-of-control prosecution”
For example
“Baldwin sued last year, alleging he was the victim of an out-of-control prosecution” — Variety
“The court said that Santa Fe officials are shielded by prosecutorial immunity, though it nodded to potentially "gross misconduct" across the criminal case.” — The Hollywood Reporter

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.