Federal judge temporarily blocks border wall construction across Texas' Big Bend sector
Judge Kathleen Cardone granted a preliminary injunction halting border wall and related construction across the roughly 500-mile Big Bend sector, including Big Bend National Park, while a lawsuit over federal waivers proceeds. Customs and Border Protection said it stands by its legal authorities.
Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from Just the News.
1 / 3
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2On Friday 2 October 2026, a federal court in Texas temporarily blocked the Trump administration from building a border wall and other infrastructure across the state's Big Bend region. ABC NewsLC “A federal court in Texas on Friday issued a ruling temporarily blocking the Trump administration from building a border wall and other infrastructure across the state's Big Bend region” Read at ABC News ↗ Inside Climate NewsLC “Federal Judge Kathleen Cardone granted a preliminary injunction Friday to halt construction on the border wall in Texas’ expansive Big Bend sector” Read at Inside Climate News ↗ Left · 2Judge Kathleen Cardone read a brief order from the bench in El Paso after more than four hours of testimony. She said the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of at least one claim, would likely suffer irreparable harm without an injunction, and that the balance of equities and the public interest favoured them. Inside Climate NewsLC “Cardone read a brief order from the bench after hearing more than four hours of testimony” Read at Inside Climate News ↗ ABC NewsLC “likely to succeed on the merits of at least one of the claims in suit, that there is a likelihood that they will suffer serious, irreparable harm without an injunction” Read at ABC News ↗ Right · 1Just the News quoted the two-page written order as saying the administration “shall not build border barrier or related infrastructure, or engage in any construction or ground disturbing activities, in the Big Bend sector,” and reported that it also bars the administration from using waivers of environmental and other laws until the case is finished. Just the NewsRC “shall not build border barrier or related infrastructure, or engage in any construction or ground disturbing activities, in the Big Bend sector”“barred the administration from using waivers of environmental and other laws until the case is finished” Read at Just the News ↗
Left · 2The ruling covers Big Bend National Park, Big Bend Ranch State Park and the border along the Rio Grande across the whole sector, which spans more than 500 miles, about a quarter of the roughly 2,000-mile southern border. Inside Climate News reported that it halts construction until the federal government complies with all applicable laws, and that the injunction stays in place while the court considers the lawsuit, which was filed in April. ABC NewsLC “extends across the entire, roughly 500-mile-long Big Bend sector, which accounts for about a quarter of the roughly 2,000-mile-long southern border with Mexico” Read at ABC News ↗ Inside Climate NewsLC “The ruling applies to all of Big Bend National Park, Big Bend Ranch State Park and the border along the Rio Grande in the rest of the sector.”“until the federal government complies with all applicable laws” Read at Inside Climate News ↗ Left · 1The suit was brought by the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Ruidosa Church and river guide Danny Miller Jr. against the Department of Homeland Security and Secretary Markwayne Mullin. They argue DHS wrongly waived dozens of laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act, to fast-track construction. Under the injunction, the effect of those waivers is stayed. Inside Climate NewsLC “sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Secretary Markwayne Mullin for waiving dozens of laws to fast-track the border wall through the Big Bend region”“Under the injunction, the effect of the waivers is stayed.” Read at Inside Climate News ↗ Left · 1At the hearing, plaintiffs called eight witnesses. They argued there was no evidence Big Bend is an area of “high illegal entry,” as the waivers state. Adam Isaacson of the Washington Office on Latin America presented data placing the sector in “distant last place” for unauthorized crossings among the nine border sectors. Plaintiffs also said the government never supplied granular detention data for the national park. According to Inside Climate News, Justice Department attorneys presented few counterarguments and called no witnesses. Inside Climate NewsLC “Attorneys for the plaintiffs called eight people to testify Friday.”“U.S. Department of Justice attorneys presented few counterarguments and did not present any witnesses.” Read at Inside Climate News ↗
Left · 1The projects are part of a $46 billion administration effort to line the southern border with 30-foot steel walls, vehicle barriers, roads and surveillance technology. Landowners, businesses and environmentalists in Big Bend have opposed them, and the AP described the opposition as bipartisan. Opponents argue the remote, rugged terrain is its own deterrent to illegal immigration. ABC NewsLC “part of a $46 billion effort by the Trump administration to line the southern border with a mix of 30-foot-tall steel walls, vehicle barriers, roads and surveillance technology”“The border wall project through the Big Bend sector has sparked bipartisan opposition.” Read at ABC News ↗ Right · 1Just the News, citing the Associated Press, said federal officials have argued that barrier construction was necessary because the number of people trying to enter the country would increase as barriers were built in other parts of the border. Just the NewsRC “Federal officials have argued that barrier construction was necessary because the number of people trying to enter the country would increase as barriers were constructed in other parts of the border, according to the Associated Press.” Read at Just the News ↗ Left · 2The first border wall panels in the sector went up in mid-September. After excavators and bulldozers were documented clearing land in Big Bend National Park in mid-August, Customs and Border Protection paused activity there on 17 August. The pause expired on 30 September, and the administration has said it is reevaluating its plans for the park without saying what it will do. ABC NewsLC “The court's decision comes just weeks after the administration erected the first border wall panels in the Big Bend sector in mid-September.”“The administration has said it’s reevaluating plans for the National Park but has not yet said what it will do there.” Read at ABC News ↗ Inside Climate NewsLC “Customs and Border Protection then issued a construction pause in the park on Aug. 17.” Read at Inside Climate News ↗
Left · 2Current plans call for vehicle barriers and access roads inside the state and national parks and a 30-foot steel wall on private land outside them. In those areas the government has been seeking landowner permission to survey and build, and a recent court filing said it was prepared to refer some cases to the Justice Department where permission was not secured. Inside Climate NewsLC “A 30-foot steel wall is planned for private land in Big Bend outside the parks.” Read at Inside Climate News ↗ ABC NewsLC “it said it was prepared to refer some cases to the Justice Department where it hadn't been able to secure permission from landowners” Read at ABC News ↗ Left · 1Laiken Jordahl of the Center for Biological Diversity called the ruling a “total victory” and said “the bulldozers are going to be sent packing until she rules on the merits.” Tiernan Sittenfeld, president and CEO of the National Parks Conservation Association, urged the administration to repair the damage already done to the park and work with local communities on alternatives. ABC NewsLC “called Cardone’s ruling a “total victory.””“repair the damage from this ill-conceived project, and find new solutions” Read at ABC News ↗ Left · 1A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson said the agency stands by its assessment, remains confident in its legal authorities to secure the border while preserving the Big Bend landscape, and is working with the Justice Department on next steps. The White House referred questions to DHS, which did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Inside Climate NewsLC “We stand by our assessment and remain confident in our legal authorities to secure the border while preserving the unique landscape of the Big Bend region”“The White House referred questions to the Department of Homeland Security, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.” Read at Inside Climate News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets treat the injunction as a win for landowners, conservationists and residents against a contested administration project. ABC (AP wire) leads with the ruling and its scope; Inside Climate News leads with courtroom detail and plaintiff testimony.
- Emphasis
- Plaintiff testimony, data showing low illegal crossings, bipartisan opposition, environmental and cultural harm, and the damage already done in the park.
- Leaves out or plays down
- The administration's legal arguments get little space; DOJ is described as presenting few counterarguments, and only a short CBP statement appears. Neither outlet has a supporter of the wall.
- For example
-
“in a victory for opponents who have pushed back against what has long been a key campaign promise” — ABC News
“U.S. Department of Justice attorneys presented few counterarguments and did not present any witnesses.” — Inside Climate News
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Just the News gives a short, procedural report centred on the court order's wording and the administration being blocked, describing the plaintiffs as a group of locals and the ruling as following community backlash.
- Emphasis
- The order's text, the likelihood-of-success finding, the bar on waivers, the plaintiffs' August irreparable-harm argument, and the federal officials' rationale for building.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Leaves out the hearing testimony, data showing low crossings in the sector, bipartisan opposition, the advocacy groups' statements and the CBP statement that it stands by its legal authorities.
- Charged language
- “following backlash from the surrounding community”
- For example
-
“following backlash from the surrounding community” — Just the News
“The plaintiffs, who are a group of locals consisting of a river guide and a church preservation group” — Just the News
What every side reports
- Judge Kathleen Cardone issued a temporary block on border wall construction across the Big Bend sector on 2 October 2026.
- The ruling covers Big Bend National Park and the roughly 500-mile sector.
- The plaintiffs include the Center for Biological Diversity, and they challenge DHS waivers of environmental and other laws.
- Customs and Border Protection paused work in the national park in August; the pause has expired.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether wall construction in the Big Bend sector is justified
- Left
- Reports plaintiffs' data placing the sector last among nine for unauthorized crossings and that DOJ presented few counterarguments.
- Right
- Reports federal officials' argument that barriers elsewhere would push more people to attempt entry.
-
Judge Cardone found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of at least one claim.
Reported- Reports 3
- ABC News, Inside Climate News, Just the News
-
The injunction covers the entire Big Bend sector, not only Big Bend National Park.
Reported- Reports 3
- ABC News, Inside Climate News, Just the News
-
The plaintiffs allege DHS unlawfully waived environmental and other laws to speed up border wall construction.
Reported- Reports 3
- ABC News, Inside Climate News, Just the News
Kathleen Cardone person
Judge Cardone found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on at least one claim, likely to suffer irreparable harm, and that equities and public interest favour them.
“the balance of the equities and the public interest weigh in their favor” — ABC News
Donald Trump person
The Trump administration has made the border wall a key campaign promise and a $46 billion effort. Customs and Border Protection says it stands by its assessment and is working with DOJ on next steps.
“We are working with the Department of Justice on next steps.” — Inside Climate News
“a key campaign promise by President Donald Trump” — ABC News
Big Bend place
Big Bend landowners, businesses, river guides and environmental groups oppose the wall, citing the harm to the landscape and the region's low level of illegal crossings.
“Landowners, businesses and environmentalists in the region have united to oppose the planned infrastructure projects” — ABC News
Left2 articles
-
ABC NewsLC · · via AP
Judge temporarily blocks border wall construction in Texas’ Big Bend region
Sympathetic AP wire copy carried by ABC News reports the ruling as a victory for opponents of a key Trump campaign promise, with advocate quotes and little administration response.

-
Federal Judge Slams the Brakes on Big Bend Border Wall Construction
Sympathetic On-the-ground report from the El Paso courtroom centred on plaintiff testimony and emotional reactions, with a short CBP response.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right1 article
-
Federal judge blocks border wall construction in Texas national park
Neutral Brief, court-order-focused report that includes the administration's stated rationale for the wall and little reaction from either side.

- 2 Oct 23:28 First ABC NewsLC Judge temporarily blocks border wall construction in Texas’ Big Bend region via AP
- 2 Oct 23:46 +18m Inside Climate NewsLC Federal Judge Slams the Brakes on Big Bend Border Wall Construction
- 3 Oct 00:36 +1h 8m Just the NewsRC Federal judge blocks border wall construction in Texas national park
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.