Flock CEO says no police customers dropped over abuse, defends surveillance at Disrupt
Speaking at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco, Flock CEO Garrett Langley said the company has not ended any police or law enforcement contract over misuse of its license plate cameras, and argued against pausing the technology.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Centre · 1Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley said at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco on Wednesday 14 October that the company has not ended any contract with a police department or other law enforcement agency over abuse of its products. TechCrunchN “Flock CEO Garrett Langley said that his company has not ended any contracts with its customers over abuse of its products.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ TechCrunchN “speaking on stage during a panel at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco on Wednesday” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1Langley told TechCrunch editor-in-chief Connie Loizos that Flock would end a relationship where there was clear widespread abuse, saying: "If a customer knowingly broke the law, we would fire them immediately." He added that it is "not off the table" but that the company has not done so to date. TechCrunchN ““If a customer knowingly broke the law, we would fire them immediately. That’s very easy,” Langley said.”“Today, we haven’t fired any customers, but it’s not off the table in the case of some pretty drastic law-abiding issue,”” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1TechCrunch said the remarks follow reporting on dozens of police officers arrested, fired or told to resign for abusing access to Flock's national database of license plate detections, often to stalk people. Langley said the debate happened internally and that Flock should not take its product from a community that may need it to fight crime. TechCrunchN “identifying dozens of police officers who have been arrested, fired, or told to resign after being caught abusing access to Flock’s nationwide database of license plate detections”“argued that the company should not take away its product from a community that might need it in its efforts to fight crime.” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Mixed · 2More broadly, Langley defended the technology, saying: "If we want to live in a society where, if you commit a crime, you have a higher probability of being held accountable, we shouldn't pause progress." He compared Flock to driverless cars, arguing that one accident should lead to discussion of prevention, not shutdown. TechCrunchN “we shouldn’t pause progress,” Langley said” Read at TechCrunch ↗ BreitbartR “And when there’s one accident, I don’t think the answer is to shut down driverless cars.” Read at Breitbart ↗ Mixed · 2He said Flock does not want to "tell city leaders how to do their job" and will offer recommendations and defaults while minimising mandated features and policies. On curbing abuse, he said there is a way that does not disrupt the legal system or police efficacy, though TechCrunch noted he did not spell out what that would involve. BreitbartR ““We don’t want to tell city leaders how to do their job,” he said.” Read at Breitbart ↗ TechCrunchN “without spelling out what those ideas were.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Mixed · 2Langley also cited declining law enforcement staffing, particularly since the pandemic, as a reason for Flock's value, and said criticism was "the price you pay" for building a consequential company. He acknowledged Flock "is far from perfect" and has made mistakes. TechCrunchN “law enforcement employment is declining rapidly.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ BreitbartR “And Flock is far from perfect; I’m far from perfect, I’ve made plenty of mistakes,”” Read at Breitbart ↗
Centre · 1Langley said some customers cancelled because of misinformation, such as a belief the cameras use facial recognition. TechCrunch noted Flock cameras do not do facial recognition but can detect and track people. TechCrunchN “While Flock cameras do not have facial recognition, they do have the ability to detect and track people.” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1TechCrunch described Flock as a flashpoint: it has more than 100,000 cameras in the US, some towns have cancelled contracts, some communities have switched to rivals such as Axon, and there are reports of camera inaccuracies leading to wrongful stops and arrests. Langley said the company has "no desire to sell" and is not considering a sale to Axon. TechCrunchN “Flock has more than 100,000 cameras around the United States”““No, we’ve no desire to sell the company.”” Read at TechCrunch ↗ Centre · 1Protesters outside the venue opposed Flock's AI-powered surveillance. Organiser Ashley Ortiz of The Wolves said opposition to mass surveillance crosses party lines. TechCrunch also noted Flock has no direct ICE contract, though ICE has reportedly accessed Flock data through local police. TechCrunchN “demonstrators gathered outside the venue to protest against Flock’s AI-powered surveillance”“Flock does not have a direct contract with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)” Read at TechCrunch ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- TechCrunch ran one news report on the no-customers-dropped remark, with protest and context on abuse reports, and a second, critical piece on his defence of the technology.
- Emphasis
- Documented abuse by officers, protests, cancelled contracts, ICE access, accuracy problems and the gap between Langley's answers and the concerns.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Little of Langley's own case beyond selected quotes.
- Charged language
- “controversial founder”“no substantive answers”“deflected hard questions”
- For example
-
“deflected hard questions about the criticism Flock now faces” — TechCrunch
“Flock has become a flashpoint in the surveillance debate” — TechCrunch
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Breitbart summarised TechCrunch's interview as Langley's reply to critics, mostly in his own words.
- Emphasis
- Langley's arguments: progress, driverless-car analogy, police staffing shortages, minimal mandates.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the abuse reports, the no-customers-fired remark, protests, ICE access and TechCrunch's criticism of his answers.
- Charged language
- “Critics of His Cameras”
- For example
-
“Langley pushed back on critics who say Flock’s cameras amount to invasive surveillance.” — Breitbart
What every side reports
- Langley spoke at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco.
- He said 'we shouldn't pause progress' and compared Flock to driverless cars.
- Flock faces cancelled contracts and layoffs.
- Langley said Flock leaves policy decisions to city leaders and admitted it is 'far from perfect'.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether Langley answered critics on abuse
- Centre
- TechCrunch said he deflected hard questions, gave anecdotes and had 'no substantive answers' on abuse.
- Right
- Breitbart relayed his answers as a reasoned defence, saying he 'pushed back on critics' and that oversight is possible without hampering police.
Garrett Langley person
Says Flock has not dropped any police customer, would do so for knowing lawbreaking, and that society should not pause progress; places policy with city leaders.
“Today, we haven’t fired any customers” — TechCrunch
“we shouldn’t pause progress,” Langley said” — TechCrunch
Flock Safety organisation
Presented through Langley as a public good that helps solve crimes, while accepting it is imperfect; reported to face cancellations, layoffs, protests and abuse allegations.
“Flock has more than 100,000 cameras around the United States” — TechCrunch
“even as Flock contends with canceled contracts and layoffs nationwide” — Breitbart
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre2 articles
-
Flock CEO: We haven’t ‘fired’ any police departments as customers
Critical News report leading with the no-firings admission, set against abuse reports, protests and community pushback.

-
Flock CEO defends surveillance technology amid national backlash: ‘We shouldn’t pause progress’
Critical Analysis saying Langley deflected hard questions and offered no concrete answers on abuse.

Right1 article
-
Flock CEO Garrett Langley to Critics of His Cameras: 'We Shouldn't Pause Progress'
Sympathetic Retells Langley's defence largely in his own words, without the abuse context or TechCrunch's critique.

- 14 Oct 21:26 First TechCrunchN Flock CEO: We haven’t ‘fired’ any police departments as customers
- 15 Oct 01:49 +4h 23m TechCrunchN Flock CEO defends surveillance technology amid national backlash: ‘We shouldn’t pause progress’
- 17 Oct 19:41 +70h 15m BreitbartR Flock CEO Garrett Langley to Critics of His Cameras: 'We Shouldn't Pause Progress'
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…