Skip to content
Bramble

Economy

Fourteen economies join US in statement to counter industrial overcapacity

Fourteen economies signed a joint ministerial statement with the United States on 7 October, pledging coordinated work on government-backed excess industrial capacity in five sectors. China did not sign, and the statement does not name it.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Breitbart

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Fourteen economies joined the United States in a joint ministerial statement announced on Wednesday 7 October, pledging to work together against government-backed industrial overproduction. Mixed · 2The signatories are Argentina, Australia, Canada, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Poland, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the United States. Centre · 1G20 members China, Brazil, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa did not sign.

Centre · 1The statement calls on all countries to eliminate structural excess capacity, including by ending non-market policies and practices that distort markets. Right · 1Breitbart reports that the signatories will set up dedicated platforms for five initial sectors: automobiles and electric vehicles, batteries, chemicals, foundational semiconductors, and solar panels. Right · 1According to Breitbart, technical officials are to meet before December to draw up terms of reference, exchange non-confidential information on excess capacity and identify data gaps. The signatories also agreed to explore complementary protective actions and invited other countries, including non-OECD members, to take part.

Right · 1The statement does not name China, but Breitbart says Beijing's industrial policies are the principal target. It also says the statement imposes no new tariffs and specifies no enforcement measures. Mixed · 2The initiative follows last week's G20 trade ministerial in Milwaukee, where ministers did not reach consensus on excess industrial capacity and forced labour. Mixed · 2US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that, unchecked, these issues will "cripple domestic industries, displace local production, and hinder our ability to raise the standard of living for workers and their families". He said the Trump administration would keep working with partners to defend US industries and workers from such distortions.

Right · 1The statement recalls a 2016 G20 agreement that subsidies could distort markets and cause overcapacity, which led to the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity. The signatories say the problem has since worsened.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Hindustan Times, running a PTI agency report, presents the statement as a multilateral call for global action, with India in the headline and a plain list of who signed and who did not.
Emphasis
The signatory list, the G20 members that did not sign, and Greer's statement.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the five named sectors, the December technical meetings, or China as the implied target.
For example
“India, 13 other countries call for global action to curb excess industrial production” — Hindustan Times
“G20 members China, Brazil, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa did not sign the joint statement.” — Hindustan Times

Right1 outlet

Framing
Breitbart treats the statement as a win for the Trump administration and USTR Jamieson Greer, and as growing allied backing against Chinese trade practices.
Emphasis
Sectors covered, China as the unnamed principal target, the follow-up work plan, and the lack of new tariffs.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not list the G20 members that stayed out, apart from implying the G20 split.
Charged language
“predatory trade practices”“predatory mercantilist practices”“major policy win”
For example
“The statement represents a major policy win for U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer” — Breitbart
“confronting predatory mercantilist practices by China and other countries” — Breitbart