Freedmen group says reparations should cover only descendants of enslaved people, not immigrants
Activists from the U.S. Freedmen Project told Fox News Digital that reparations programs in states such as New Jersey and New York should be limited to lineal descendants of enslaved people. Only two right-leaning outlets, one republishing the other's report, covered it.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Activists from the U.S. Freedmen Project told Fox News Digital that recent immigrants and non-foundational Black Americans should not be included in government reparations programs. Fox NewsR “recent immigrants and non-foundational Black Americans should not be included in government reparations programs” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “recent immigrants and non-foundational Black Americans should not be included in government reparations programs” Read at New York Post ↗ Spokesperson Annette Wilcox said policies cite slavery and Jim Crow but then direct resources to a wider group, which she called using "one group of people's history to then give remedies to a wider group". Fox NewsR “Then, when it comes time to give out resources and remedies, it's going to everybody” Read at Fox News ↗ The group describes itself as made up of self-identified "Foundational Black Americans" and says true reparations must be lineage-based, reserved for direct descendants of enslaved people in the United States. Fox NewsR “composed of self-identified "Foundational Black Americans,"” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “They maintain that true reparations must be lineage-based” Read at New York Post ↗
Wilcox reacted to New Jersey's proposed Truth, Reconciliation, and Repair Act, sponsored by Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and state Sen. Angela McKnight, which would set up a framework for state-level reparative policies. New York PostR “the bill seeks to establish a framework for state-level reparative policies” Read at New York Post ↗ Fox NewsR “spearheaded by Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and state Sen. Angela McKnight” Read at Fox News ↗ Group president Devine Prince said the left is "conflating reparations with racial justice and social justice", and argued that a policy tied to lineage rather than race is more likely to survive legal challenges. New York PostR “Prince argued that for any reparations policy to survive inevitable legal challenges, it must be tied strictly to lineage rather than race.” Read at New York Post ↗ At a New York hearing on Long Island, supporter Aubrey Muhammad said politicians had directed resources away from historic Black communities, and claimed Democrats "imported 25 million immigrants", 70% of whom he said settled in poor Black neighborhoods; the articles do not test those figures. Fox NewsR “The Democrats, in a sick way, imported 25 million immigrants. And 70% of them came into poor Black neighborhoods,” Read at Fox News ↗
The articles cite Census data showing Hempstead is now 43.2% Black and 45.3% Hispanic or Latino, against roughly 14% Hispanic in 1990. New York PostR “In 1990, the Hispanic population made up roughly 14% of the village.” Read at New York Post ↗ Evanston, Illinois, which distributed government-funded reparations, faces a class-action lawsuit alleging its race-based eligibility violates the Equal Protection Clause; Fox names Judicial Watch as the plaintiff, while the Post adds the Trump administration. Fox NewsR “a high-profile class-action lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “a high-profile class-action lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch and the Trump administration” Read at New York Post ↗ The New Jersey lawmakers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Fox NewsR “The New Jersey lawmakers did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.” Read at Fox News ↗ New York PostR “The New Jersey lawmakers did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.” Read at New York Post ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Presents the Freedmen Project's view as an intra-Black critique of Democratic-led states, saying they use slavery's history to fund a broader agenda. The New York Post republishes the Fox News Digital report almost verbatim under a Fox byline.
- Emphasis
- Quotes from Freedmen Project leaders, criticism of Democrats and 'people of color' coalitions, immigration and demographic change in Hempstead, and legal vulnerability of race-based programs.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No voices from New Jersey lawmakers, the New Jersey Reparations Council or advocates for broader eligibility; the claim about 25 million immigrants is not fact-checked; no detail on what the New Jersey bill would actually provide.
- Charged language
- “in a sick way”“flooded with immigrants”“hijack the legal definition of reparations”
- For example
-
“Reparations activists call out blue states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda” — Fox News
“Reparations activists call out Democrat states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda” — New York Post
What every side reports
- The U.S. Freedmen Project says reparations should be limited to lineal descendants of enslaved people.
- New Jersey's Truth, Reconciliation, and Repair Act and New York's reparations commission are the main policy contexts.
- Evanston's reparations program faces a class-action lawsuit over race-based eligibility.
- New Jersey lawmakers had not responded to requests for comment.
Where accounts differ
-
Who filed the class-action lawsuit against Evanston's reparations program
- Right
- Fox News says Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, filed it; the New York Post version of the same text says Judicial Watch and the Trump administration filed it.
U.S. Freedmen Project organisation
Says reparations must be lineage-based and limited to descendants of enslaved people, and that broader social-justice goals need separate remedies; argues that race-based eligibility invites legal challenge.
“Reparations, in the context we’re talking about, are only for those that were enslaved, emancipated, and then subject to the badges and incidents thereof,” — New York Post
“they should not hijack the legal definition of reparations” — New York Post
Slavery reparations topic
Presented as an expanding policy area in New Jersey, New York and Evanston, with disagreement over who is eligible and whether race-based criteria are legal.
“New Jersey and New York are part of a broader wave of state and municipal governments exploring reparative frameworks.” — New York Post
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right3 articles
-
Reparations activists call out blue states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda
Critical Fox News Digital leads with Freedmen Project activists criticising blue states for broadening reparations, and quotes them at length with little opposing view.

-
Reparations activists call out Democrat states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda
Critical New York Post republishes the Fox report with near-identical framing and quotes, and adds the Trump administration as a co-plaintiff in the Evanston suit.

-

- 30 Sep 01:58 First Fox NewsR Reparations activists call out blue states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda
- 30 Sep 08:23 +6h 25m New York PostR Reparations activists call out Democrat states for using slavery history to fund broader agenda
- 1 Oct 02:20 +24h 22m Fox NewsR Reparations advocates slam cash compensation ‘handout’ label, point to past government remedies
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.