Skip to content
Bramble

World

France fast-tracks bill making protesters jointly liable for up to €10,000 of damage

The French government is fast-tracking a "vandals pay" bill that would make people who knowingly belong to a group jointly liable for damage it causes, up to €10,000. Unions, the Human Rights League and some lawyers say it threatens the right to protest; the government says it is needed to compensate victims.

3 outlets · 1L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Guardian
Image: France 24
Image: The Straits Times

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The French government is fast-tracking a bill, dubbed the "vandals pay" law, under which people at demonstrations could be made to pay up to €10,000 for damage and vandalism. Left · 1According to the Guardian, a person could be held liable even if they did not directly cause the damage, if they were continuing to demonstrate nearby or were part of the same group as the perpetrators; the bill also provides for greater use of drones over protests. Right · 1Reuters, carried by the Straits Times, reports that the text says anyone who knowingly formed part of a group would be jointly responsible for damage caused by any member, and that it would allow the state to seize welfare entitlements of those convicted, or of their parents if they are minors.

Left · 1The bill is being debated in parliament this week, with the Senate taking it up; the Guardian says it was originally prepared after violent clashes following Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League win over Arsenal in May. Mixed · 2It comes amid more than a month of protests, begun by high-school students blockading schools over teacher absences, building repairs and the university applications platform, which trade unions and yellow vest protesters have since joined, and after looting, fires and vandalism on 17 October, described as among France's worst unrest in years. Mixed · 2Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu called the bill "absolutely essential" after the looting and burning, and Interior Minister Laurent Nunez, who offered to resign last week after security forces were overwhelmed but was asked by Macron to stay, said it creates "a joint responsibility - not a collective one".

Right · 1The government says the law is needed to compensate victims of vandalism, and French businesses say they have lost millions of euros to looting, vandalism or closures; Reuters adds that backers cite surveys showing broad public support. Mixed · 2Opponents include leftwing trade unions and the Human Rights League (LDH), who in a Le Monde open letter called it an "unfair law" and a "serious attack on the freedom to demonstrate" that should be abandoned, as well as La France Insoumise's Éric Coquerel, Communist senator Fabien Gay and lawyer Hanna Bouchareb, who said legitimate protesters near violence could be held responsible. Mixed · 2Marine Le Pen's National Rally, the far-right frontrunner for next spring's presidential election, claims the idea as its own; Le Pen vowed at an Orléans rally that "Vandals will pay", while RN senator Edwige Diaz said the law should go further than the €10,000 cap.

Left · 1The Guardian also reports that authorities have restricted demonstrations, including bans on non-union protests deemed "illegitimate", on gatherings outside schools and in city centres, curfews in places and longer police custody, without a state of emergency; public law professor Serge Slama called the decrees "unprecedented" and said they would benefit the far right if it won power. Mixed · 2Reuters notes that protesters have accused police of heavy-handed tactics against student protesters, and that lawyers have raised legal concerns over fast-tracked convictions of alleged rioters; Lecornu was due to meet representatives of protesting high-schoolers on Monday.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Guardian leads on the threat to the right to protest, casting the bill as a Macron-government move that unions say curbs a fundamental right and could help the far right.
Emphasis
Union and left-wing opposition, the wider crackdown on demonstrations, Le Pen's campaign launch and the RN's claim to authorship of the idea.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report Interior Minister Nunez's 'joint, not collective' defence, the welfare-seizure provision or public-support surveys.
Charged language
“vandals pay”“puts right to protest at risk”“innocent protesters”
For example
“Making innocent protesters liable for damage would be bad for rule of law and play into far-right hands, say opponents” — The Guardian
“Emmanuel Macron has been accused by trade unions of trying to curb the fundamental French right to protest” — The Guardian

Centre1 outlet

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Straits Times runs Reuters copy that leads on the backlash from rights groups and lawyers, but gives the government's rationale and Nunez's rebuttal and notes the bill's popularity.
Emphasis
Legal wording of joint responsibility, business losses, welfare seizure, poll support and the RN wanting a higher cap.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the drone provision, Lecornu's statement, or the broader protest bans and curfews. This is wire copy, so it is the agency's framing rather than the outlet's own.
Charged language
“anti-democratic”“rioters”
For example
“Critics attack 'anti-democratic' French bill making rioters pay” — The Straits Times
“Backers of the proposed new law point to surveys showing broad public support for it.” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…