French navy chief sees no threat to US catapult supply for future carrier
Admiral Christophe Cluzel told a parliamentary hearing that the US has not yet decided to drop electromagnetic catapults, so he does not see France's contract for its next carrier threatened. He also said a study due in 2028 will assess whether France could design its own.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2France's navy chief, Admiral Christophe Cluzel, said on 14 October that the US has not yet decided whether to abandon the electromagnetic launch system for aircraft carriers. The Straits TimesRC “The US has not yet decided whether to abandon the electromagnetic launch system for aircraft carriers, France's navy chief said on Wednesday” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Arab NewsRC “The US has not yet decided whether to abandon the electromagnetic launch system for aircraft carriers, France’s navy chief said on Wednesday” Read at Arab News ↗ Right · 2President Donald Trump ordered the US Navy in August to revert to older steam-powered catapults, calling the electromagnetic system unreliable, which raised doubts over future supply of the technology France has chosen for its next carrier. The Straits TimesRC “Trump ordered the Navy in August to revert to the older steam-powered catapults, calling the electromagnetic system unreliable.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Arab NewsRC “The move raised doubts over the future supply of the technology, which is used for launching jet fighters from the ships.” Read at Arab News ↗ Right · 1Cluzel, who is chief of France's naval staff, told a parliamentary hearing: "The American decision has not yet been taken. I do not see our contract threatened." The Straits TimesRC “"The American decision has not yet been taken," Admiral Christophe Cluzel, chief of France’s naval staff, told a parliamentary hearing. "I do not see our contract threatened."” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 1He was answering a member of parliament's question about the dependency of the carrier, described as a key part of France's nuclear deterrence, on American technology, and the possibility it could be left without supply if the US turned to steam catapults. The Straits TimesRC “The Admiral was answering a question from a member of parliament about the dependency of the French aircraft carrier, a key part of its nuclear deterrence, on an American technology” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 2Cluzel called the dependency one that "within the framework of the programme was accepted and considered to be under control", and said France would buy a substantial stock of spare parts from the start of the programme. The Straits TimesRC “"It’s a dependency that within the framework of the programme was accepted and considered to be under control", the navy chief said.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Arab NewsRC “He added that France would buy a substantial stock of spare parts from the beginning of the program.” Read at Arab News ↗ Right · 1He said a study is planned to examine France's capacity to design such catapults, with their potential costs and delivery times, with conclusions expected in 2028. The Straits TimesRC “a study was planned to examine France’s capacity to design such catapults, its potential costs and delivery times, with conclusions expected in 2028.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 1Cluzel said France could probably do it, but on timelines far beyond the France Libre's service-entry horizon and at a considerably higher unit cost. Arab NewsRC ““I think we would be able to do it, but on timelines that go far beyond the service-entry horizon of the France Libre, and at a unit cost that would obviously be considerably higher,” he said.” Read at Arab News ↗ Right · 2The France Libre, being built under the lead of Naval Group, is due to replace the ageing Charles de Gaulle around 2038, and the episode highlights European dependence on US defence technology amid a push for strategic autonomy. The Straits TimesRC “the France Libre, due to replace the ageing Charles de Gaulle around 2038. European dependence on US defence technology has come under growing scrutiny as the continent seeks greater strategic autonomy.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Arab NewsRC “Naval Group is leading the construction of the carrier.” Read at Arab News ↗ Right · 2Cluzel has a meeting scheduled with his American counterpart next week and expects the topic to be discussed; the US Embassy in France did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Straits TimesRC “Cluzel added that he had a meeting scheduled with his American counterpart next week, and that he thought the topic would be discussed.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Arab NewsRC “The US Embassy in France did not immediately respond to a request for comment.” Read at Arab News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets run the same straight-news account (Reuters text in The Straits Times) led by the navy chief's reassurance, with the dependency on US technology and European strategic autonomy as context.
- Emphasis
- Cluzel's confidence in the contract, the spare-parts stock, and the caveat that a domestic alternative would be slower and costlier.
- Leaves out or plays down
- No US government or Naval Group response is included; the US Embassy had not replied.
- Charged language
- “vital component”
- For example
-
“European dependence on US defence technology has come under growing scrutiny as the continent seeks greater strategic autonomy.” — The Straits Times
“The situation highlights France’s reliance on US technology for the vital component of its next-generation aircraft carrier” — Arab News
What every side reports
- Admiral Christophe Cluzel said the US decision on electromagnetic catapults has not yet been taken and he does not see the contract threatened.
- Trump ordered the US Navy in August to revert to steam catapults.
- A study on French capacity to design its own catapults is expected to conclude in 2028.
- The US Embassy in France did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
French Navy organisation
Through its chief of staff, the French Navy says the US decision is not yet made, sees its contract as not threatened, calls the dependency accepted and under control, and plans a spare-parts stock and a 2028 study on domestic design.
“"I do not see our contract threatened."” — The Straits Times
“He added that France would buy a substantial stock of spare parts from the beginning of the program.” — Arab News
Donald Trump person
Trump ordered the US Navy in August to return to steam catapults, calling the electromagnetic system unreliable; no new comment from him is reported.
“Trump ordered the Navy in August to revert to the older steam-powered catapults, calling the electromagnetic system unreliable.” — The Straits Times
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Reuters
French navy chief sees no threat to US catapult supply for future carrier
Neutral Reuters copy carried by The Straits Times; straight report of Cluzel's reassurance with context on dependency.
-
French navy chief sees no threat to US catapult supply for future carrier
Neutral Arab News carries the same account, with American spelling, led by the navy chief's confidence about the contract.
- 14 Oct 12:50 First The Straits TimesRC French navy chief sees no threat to US catapult supply for future carrier via Reuters
- 14 Oct 16:12 +3h 21m Arab NewsRC French navy chief sees no threat to US catapult supply for future carrier
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…