Skip to content
Bramble

Entertainment

Oasis take legal action; auction of sound engineer's tapes withdrawn

Oasis and the Gallagher brothers have sued the band's former sound engineer Huw Richards and his son over a planned auction of unheard 1990s recordings. The auction house has withdrawn the tapes from its 3 October sale.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Mail
Image: BBC News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Oasis have taken legal action to stop the sale of a set of unheard recordings made by their former sound engineer Huw Richards, valued at £1.2m to £1.6m. The Daily Mail reports that Noel and Liam Gallagher filed papers at the High Court on Tuesday naming Richards, his son Owain and the Worcestershire auction house as defendants. It adds that Oasis Partnership, Sony Music and Big Brother Recordings are also claimants.

Richards worked with the band from the release of Definitely, Maybe in 1994 until 2001, and the collection includes soundchecks and conversation between the brothers. The Mail says the collection is 209 DAT tapes, 73 analogue cassettes and three MiniDiscs, while the BBC describes 63 live shows and more than 100 hours of the brothers. Littleton Auctions, of Evesham, said the tapes, known as The Desk Tapes, were withdrawn from its 3 October auction in light of legal proceedings; the rest of the sale goes ahead.

Owain Richards confirmed that Oasis have sued him and his father, and said the auction was postponed so the dispute can be resolved. According to the Mail, Richards argues that he made and holds the recordings and so owns them, while Oasis say they retain the intellectual property and copyright. Unnamed sources told the Mail that Richards is "disappointed and bewildered" and had offered the tapes to the band first, and that private talks to buy them collapsed.

The BBC said it had contacted Oasis' representatives for comment, and the Mail said the claimants' solicitors and the auction house had been contacted.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Straight news report on the outcome: the tapes were pulled from the auction after the band filed an injunction.
Emphasis
Statements from the auction house and Owain Richards, and what remains in the sale.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the named claimants, Richards' ownership argument, or the failed purchase talks.
For example
“We are very disappointed that we cannot offer this significant archive as planned.” — BBC News
“The auction will go ahead with memorabilia” — BBC News

Right1 outlet

Framing
Leads on the Gallaghers suing and includes sympathetic sourcing for Richards, contrasting the brothers' reunion earnings with the action against him.
Emphasis
Court filing, claimants, law firm, the tapes' contents and Richards' side via unnamed sources.
Leaves out or plays down
Written before the withdrawal was announced, so it does not report that the tapes were pulled.
Charged language
“intimate recordings”“It feels a bit rotten to do this to him when they are off making tens of millions with their reunion.”
For example
“'It belongs to him. It feels a bit rotten to do this to him when they are off making tens of millions with their reunion.'” — Daily Mail
“put hundreds of hours of intimate recordings of the brothers up for auction” — Daily Mail